✅
Abstract
This article compares
partial pulpotomy and
conventional (full/coronal) pulpotomy in
primary teeth, focusing on
definitions, technique differences, materials, clinical outcomes, and
benefits.
📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Pulpotomy and pulpectomy procedures. Indications and Differences ... We share the similarities, differences, indications, contraindications and step-by-step procedures of pulpotomy and pulpectomy.
Recommendations and recent evidence from guidelines and systematic reviews are summarized to inform pediatric dental practice.
Advertisement
✅
Introduction
Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth aims to
preserve radicular pulp vitality, maintain space, and avoid extraction/pulpectomy where possible. The choice between a
partial pulpotomy (limited removal of coronal pulp) and a
conventional/full pulpotomy (complete removal of coronal pulp) depends on pulp status, exposure etiology (trauma vs caries), clinical signs, and material availability. Recent guideline updates and meta-analyses have refined indications and shown high overall success rates for pulpotomy procedures under appropriate conditions.
✅
Definitions
• Partial pulpotomy (also called Cvek pulpotomy in many contexts): surgical removal of a limited portion (typically ~1–3 mm) of
inflamed coronal pulp beneath an exposure, leaving most coronal pulp intact to preserve vitality and promote repair. It is commonly used after traumatic exposures and selected carious exposures when the remaining pulp appears healthy.
• Conventional (full or coronal) pulpotomy: removal of the
entire coronal pulp tissue to the level of the canal orifices, followed by placement of a medicament over radicular pulp stumps and definitive coronal restoration. It is widely used for primary molars with carious exposures when radicular pulp is judged capable of healing.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Preserving primary teeth until their natural exfoliation is a key goal in pediatric dentistry. Advances in bioactive materials have made this more predictable.
✅
Similarities
• Both are forms of
vital pulp therapy (VPT) that aim to
preserve radicular pulp vitality and avoid pulpectomy or extraction.
• Both require
hemostasis, an aseptic technique, and a hermetic coronal seal with a definitive restoration to prevent bacterial leakage.
• Success in both procedures depends on
case selection, operator skill, and appropriate
post-op follow-up (clinical + radiographic).
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Pulp Polyps in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options in Pediatric Dentistry ... While it is a protective response to chronic inflammation, it reflects significant pulpal exposure, often requiring endodontic or surgical management.
✅
Differences — techniques and clinical steps
➤ Partial pulpotomy
• Indication: small pulp exposures (trauma is classic indication) or carious exposures when the coronal inflammation is limited and the remaining pulp looks healthy.
• Procedure steps (typical):
1. Remove superficial inflamed pulp tissue ~1–3 mm (or until healthy bleeding tissue encountered).
2. Achieve
controlled hemostasis (gentle pressure with saline/sterile cotton; should stop in a few minutes).
3. Place a
biocompatible pulp dressing (e.g.,
MTA, Biodentine, calcium hydroxide, or newer calcium silicate cements).
4. Restore with durable coronal seal (glass ionomer + stainless steel crown or appropriate restoration).
➤ Conventional (full/coronal) pulpotomy
• Indication: deeper carious exposures where coronal pulp is judged inflamed but radicular pulp may still be healthy (commonly used in primary molars).
• Procedure steps (typical):
1. Remove
entire coronal pulp down to canal orifices.
2. Achieve hemostasis at canal orifices.
3. Place
pulp medicament over radicular stumps (historically formocresol, calcium hydroxide; increasingly
MTA, Biodentine, or iRoot/Bioceramics are used).
4. Definitive coronal restoration (often stainless steel crown in primary molars).
📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure ... Apexogenesis is performed on immature teeth with open apices that are affected by caries, trauma, or fractures with pulp exposure. Follow-up and clinical controls are recommended.
✅
Differences — materials (common choices and evidence)
• Calcium hydroxide (CH): traditional agent; can induce reparative dentin but associated with higher
internal resorption and lower long-term success in some studies.
• Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA): strong evidence for
higher success and better tissue response than CH in primary molar pulpotomies (less internal resorption, thicker dentinal bridge), though it can cause crown discoloration and is more costly. A randomized trial reported
~94% success for MTA vs
~65% for CH in primary molars (small RCT).
• Biodentine & other calcium-silicate cements: growing evidence suggests comparable outcomes to MTA in many settings and advantages such as improved handling and faster setting in some formulations; recent systematic reviews/meta-analyses have examined these comparisons in primary teeth.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Myths About Root Canal Treatment ... This article addresses and debunks these common misconceptions, providing accurate information to promote informed decisions about dental health.
✅
Clinical outcomes & success rates — what the recent evidence shows
• Recent meta-analysis/systematic review data indicate
high overall success rates for pulpotomy in primary teeth when performed for appropriate indications: pooled 6- and 12-month success rates reported in some reviews exceed
90% under selected conditions. However, heterogeneity in study design, materials, and follow-up remains.
•
MTA shows
higher success compared with calcium hydroxide in randomized trials of primary molars (example RCT: MTA ~94% vs CH ~65%).
•
Partial pulpotomy (when properly indicated, e.g., traumatic exposures or selective carious exposures) demonstrates
excellent success in many reports and is increasingly accepted as the conservative option for appropriately selected primary and permanent teeth. Systematic reviews of traumatic exposures report pooled success rates often in the high 80s–90s%.
📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Pulpectomy, everything you need to know: Diagnosis, indications, and filling materials ... Pulpectomy is a dental procedure that is performed on primary teeth that are affected by an infectious process that totally compromises the dental pulp.
✅
Benefits
➤ Benefits when partial pulpotomy may be preferred
•
More conservative: preserves more pulp tissue and potential for continued physiologic function.
•
Simpler and quicker: less pulp removal, often easier hemostasis, and preservation of tooth structure.
•
High success in traumatic exposures: excellent evidence supports partial pulpotomy after trauma, making it the treatment of choice for many exposed traumatized teeth.
•
Lower risk of devitalization-related sequelae: by preserving more vital tissue, risk of certain complications may be reduced if case selection is correct.
➤ Benefits of conventional/full pulpotomy:
•
Established for carious exposures in primary molars with extensive coronal pulp involvement when radicular pulp is likely healthy.
• When
MTA or modern calcium silicate cements are used, conventional pulpotomy outcomes are excellent and may avoid need for pulpectomy/extraction.
📌 Recommended Article :
PDF 🔽 What is the best pulp dressing for pulpotomies in primary teeth? - Review ... Different pulp dressings have been used in pulpotomies, each with different characteristics and properties. The article we share compares all pulp dressings to determine which is the most effective.
✅
Practical considerations & clinical decision points
• Etiology matters: Traumatic exposures often favor
partial pulpotomy; carious exposures often lead clinicians to
full pulpotomy, although selected carious exposures may be amenable to partial pulpotomy with careful assessment.
• Hemostasis test: inability to achieve hemostasis within a few minutes after pulp amputation suggests deeper inflammation and may indicate need to convert to pulpotomy/pulpectomy or extraction.
• Material selection: current guideline and trial evidence favors
bioceramic materials (MTA, Biodentine, iRoot) over CH for better outcomes in many settings. Cost, handling, and esthetic considerations (discoloration with some MTA formulations) should be weighed.
• Seal and restoration: a durable coronal seal (often a stainless steel crown in primary molars) is critical for long-term success.
🦷 Clinical Flowchart: Decision Process — Partial vs. Conventional Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth
| Clinical Step |
Assessment or Finding |
Recommended Treatment |
Key Notes |
| 1. Initial Diagnosis |
No spontaneous pain, normal mobility, no radiolucency |
Candidate for vital pulp therapy |
Confirm tooth restorable and pulp potentially vital |
| 2. Exposure Etiology |
Traumatic pulp exposure with minimal contamination |
Partial pulpotomy |
Remove 1–3 mm of inflamed tissue; ideal for trauma cases |
| 3. Carious Exposure |
Deep caries, small exposure, bleeding easily controlled |
Partial pulpotomy or Full pulpotomy |
Decision depends on depth of inflammation and hemostasis |
| 4. Hemostasis Evaluation |
Bleeding stops within 5 minutes with gentle pressure |
Partial pulpotomy |
Indicates superficial inflammation and healthy radicular pulp |
| 5. Hemostasis Difficult to Achieve |
Bleeding persists beyond 5 minutes or dark blood present |
Full pulpotomy |
Remove entire coronal pulp to canal orifices |
| 6. Pulp Status After Amputation |
Healthy bleeding tissue at orifices |
Full pulpotomy |
Apply MTA or Biodentine; avoid formocresol |
| 7. Pulp Exposure Size |
Small (≤1 mm) |
Partial pulpotomy may suffice |
Especially if recent exposure and asymptomatic |
| 8. Material Selection |
MTA, Biodentine, or bioceramic cement |
For both techniques |
High biocompatibility, promotes dentin bridge formation |
| 9. Coronal Seal |
Immediate restoration with glass ionomer + SSC |
Mandatory for both |
Ensures long-term success and prevents microleakage |
| 10. Follow-up |
Clinical & radiographic check at 6–12 months |
Both procedures |
Look for absence of symptoms, resorption, or radiolucency |
💬 Discussion
Contemporary evidence (systematic reviews and updated AAPD guidance) supports a
broader role of vital pulp therapies in primary teeth than historically believed, with
high short- to medium-term success rates when case selection, technique, and materials are appropriate. The
AAPD Vital Pulp Therapy guideline (systematic review to July 2022) provides an evidence-based framework for selecting pulpotomy vs other treatments and emphasizes the importance of
case selection, asepsis, hemostasis, and a good coronal seal.
While partial pulpotomy is classically favored for
traumatic exposures, evidence from meta-analyses indicates it can be an effective conservative option even in some carious exposures — but the clinician must carefully evaluate the extent of inflammation and ability to control bleeding. Conversely, conventional pulpotomy remains a
reliable standard for many primary molars with carious exposure, especially when modern bioceramic materials (MTA, Biodentine) are used — these appear to perform better than calcium hydroxide in randomized trials.
Limitations in the evidence base include variability in
follow-up duration, outcome definitions, and
heterogeneity of materials used across studies. Long-term comparative trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up would further clarify optimal indications for partial vs full pulpotomy in primary teeth.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons ... Pulpotec® is a radiopaque, non‑resorbable medicament widely used for pulpotomy/pulpitis treatment in vital primary and immature permanent molars, as well as for emergency root canal dressings.
✍️ Conclusion
•
Both partial and conventional pulpotomy are valid vital pulp therapies for primary teeth when performed with correct indication, aseptic technique, hemostasis, appropriate medicament (increasing evidence for MTA/bioceramics), and a durable coronal seal.
•
Partial pulpotomy is
more conservative and shows
excellent success in traumatic exposures and selected carious cases when the remaining pulp is healthy and hemostasis is achievable.
•
Conventional/full pulpotomy, especially when using
MTA or Biodentine, provides
high success rates for primary molars and may be preferable when coronal pulp removal is required.
• Clinicians should follow current
evidence-based guidelines (e.g., AAPD) and apply individualized judgment for each case.
📚 References
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2024). Vital pulp therapy guideline (Clinical Practice Guideline). Pediatric Dentistry, 46(1). Retrieved from the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry website.
✔ Lin, G. S. S., Chin, Y. J., Choong, R. S., Wafa, S. W. W. S., Dziaruddin, N., Baharin, F., & Ismail, A. F. (2024). Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Children, 11, 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11050574
✔ Liu, H., Zhou, Q., & Qin, M. (2011). Mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary molars. Chinese Journal of Dental Research, 14(2), 121–125. (Randomized clinical trial showing higher success with MTA).
✔ Madhumita, S., Chakravarthy, D., Vijayaraja, S., Kumar, A. S., & Kavimalar, D. S. (2022). The outcome of partial pulpotomy in traumatized permanent anterior teeth – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 33(2), 203–208. DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_1150_21. (Systematic review supporting high success of partial pulpotomy in traumatic exposures).
📌 More Recommended Items
►
Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children
►
Webinar: Bioceramics in Pediatric Dentistry - Dr. Patrick Ruck
►
Medications Used in Pulpotomies: Properties, Drawbacks, and Brand Names
