TheraCal: Clinical Guide, Uses & Benefits

TheraCal is a resin-modified calcium silicate material designed for vital pulp therapy and dentin protection. Its bioactive behavior, including calcium ion release and dentin bridge stimulation, has positioned it as a contemporary alternative to traditional materials.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Zinc Oxide Eugenol vs Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform in Pulpectomy ... Pulpectomy in primary teeth requires obturation materials that ensure antimicrobial efficacy, biocompatibility, and physiological resorption.

This article provides a comprehensive review of its uses, advantages, disadvantages, types, clinical application protocol, and specific considerations in pediatric dentistry.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Preserving pulp vitality remains a fundamental goal in restorative and pediatric dentistry. Materials used in deep caries management must exhibit biocompatibility, sealing ability, and bioactivity. TheraCal has emerged as a clinically efficient solution, combining biological performance with simplified handling through light-curing technology.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 TheraCal in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits & Limits ... This article reviews the versions, properties, clinical applications, advantages, and limitations of TheraCal in pediatric patients.

1. Types of TheraCal
Currently, two main formulations are available:

TheraCal LC (Light-Cured):
▪️ Most widely used version
▪️ Resin-modified calcium silicate
▪️ Immediate polymerization

TheraCal PT (Putty):
▪️ Designed for pulpotomy procedures
▪️ Higher viscosity and improved handling
▪️ Enhanced indication in pediatric dentistry

2. Clinical Uses of TheraCal
TheraCal is indicated for:

▪️ Direct pulp capping
▪️ Indirect pulp treatment (IPT)
▪️ Liner/base under restorations
▪️ Pulpotomy procedures (TheraCal PT)
▪️ Management of deep carious lesions with reversible pulpitis

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Apexogenesis with MTA: Indications, Clinical Protocol, and Evidence-Based Technique ... This article reviews indications, clinical technique, advantages, and limitations of apexogenesis with MTA, supported by current scientific evidence.

3. Mechanism of Action
The effectiveness of TheraCal is based on:

▪️ Release of calcium ions, promoting mineralization and reparative dentin formation
▪️ Alkaline pH, providing antibacterial effects
▪️ Formation of a hydroxyapatite-like layer, improving the seal
▪️ Stimulation of odontoblastic activity and pulp healing

4. Advantages of TheraCal

▪️ Immediate light curing, reducing chair time
▪️ Enhanced handling properties compared to MTA
▪️ Reduced solubility and washout risk
▪️ Bioactive stimulation of dentin bridge formation
▪️ Effective marginal seal, limiting microleakage

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy Materials Comparison: Calcium Hydroxide vs. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Primary Molars ... Pulpotomy is a widely accepted vital pulp therapy for primary molars affected by carious exposure or traumatic injury, aiming to preserve the radicular pulp and maintain tooth function until natural exfoliation.

5. Disadvantages and Limitations

▪️ Presence of resin components, which may influence biocompatibility
▪️ Lower long-term evidence compared to MTA
▪️ Potential cytotoxic effects if improperly polymerized
▪️ Technique sensitivity related to moisture control and curing depth

6. Step-by-Step Clinical Application
Standard protocol for TheraCal LC:

1. Diagnosis and case selection (reversible pulpitis only)
2. Isolation (preferably rubber dam)
3. Caries removal while preserving affected dentin
4. Hemostasis (if pulp exposure occurs)
5. Apply a thin layer of TheraCal LC (≤1 mm)
6. Light cure for 20 seconds
7. Place definitive restorative material (e.g., composite)
8. Perform occlusal adjustment and follow-up evaluation

7. Differences in Pediatric Dentistry
In pediatric patients, TheraCal demonstrates specific clinical advantages:

▪️ Reduced chair time, critical for behavior management
▪️ Simplified application, improving treatment efficiency
▪️ Indicated for pulpotomy (TheraCal PT) in primary teeth
▪️ Suitable for indirect pulp treatment in high caries-risk children

However:
▪️ Careful selection is required due to immature pulp tissue sensitivity
▪️ Long-term outcomes in primary dentition remain under investigation

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards ... For decades, calcium hydroxide–based materials played a central role in endodontics due to their antimicrobial properties and biological compatibility.

💬 Discussion
Current literature supports that TheraCal provides reliable outcomes in vital pulp therapy, particularly due to its bioactive calcium release and sealing capacity. Compared to calcium hydroxide, it exhibits superior mechanical properties and reduced dissolution, improving restoration longevity.
Nevertheless, controversy persists regarding its resin matrix, which may affect cell viability and pulp response under suboptimal conditions. While MTA remains the gold standard for bioactivity, TheraCal offers significant advantages in handling and clinical efficiency, especially in pediatric settings.
Thus, clinical decision-making should balance biological performance with procedural efficiency.

✍️ Conclusion
TheraCal is a versatile and bioactive material that enhances clinical efficiency and pulp preservation outcomes. Its ease of use and immediate setting make it particularly valuable in modern dentistry. However, case selection and correct technique remain essential to ensure optimal results.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use TheraCal in vital pulp therapy cases with reversible pulpitis
▪️ Ensure adequate isolation and proper light curing
▪️ Limit thickness to ≤1 mm for optimal polymerization
▪️ Consider TheraCal PT for pediatric pulpotomy procedures
▪️ Maintain long-term clinical and radiographic follow-up
▪️ Prefer MTA in cases requiring maximum biocompatibility

📚 References

✔ Gandolfi, M. G., Siboni, F., & Prati, C. (2012). Chemical–physical properties of TheraCal, a novel light-cured MTA-like material for pulp capping. International Endodontic Journal, 45(6), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02013.x
✔ Hebling, J., Lessa, F. C. R., Nogueira, I., Carvalho, R. M., & Costa, C. A. S. (2019). Cytotoxicity of resin-based light-cured pulp capping materials. Operative Dentistry, 44(5), E193–E203. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-089-L
✔ Camilleri, J. (2015). Hydraulic calcium silicate cements: chemistry and clinical applications. Endodontic Topics, 32(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12067
✔ Poggio, C., Arciola, C. R., Beltrami, R., Monaco, A., Dagna, A., & Lombardini, M. (2014). Cytocompatibility and antibacterial properties of capping materials. Scientific World Journal, 2014, 181945. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/181945

📌 More Recommended Items

► Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence
► Best Materials for Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: MTA vs. Biodentine vs. Ferric Sulfate
► Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence

Apexogenesis with MTA: Indications, Clinical Protocol, and Evidence-Based Technique

Apexogenesis is a vital pulp therapy aimed at maintaining pulp vitality to allow continued root development in immature permanent teeth. Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) has emerged as a gold-standard biomaterial due to its superior biocompatibility and sealing ability.

📌 Recommended Article :

Video 🔽 Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure ... Apexogenesis is performed on immature teeth with open apices that are affected by caries, trauma, or fractures with pulp exposure.

This article reviews indications, clinical technique, advantages, and limitations of apexogenesis with MTA, supported by current scientific evidence.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Apexogenesis refers to the physiological continuation of root development and apical closure in immature permanent teeth with vital pulp tissue. The preservation of pulp vitality is essential for achieving adequate root length and dentinal wall thickness.
Historically, calcium hydroxide was widely used; however, MTA has gained preference due to improved outcomes, including enhanced dentin bridge formation and superior sealing properties.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Among them, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has emerged as a gold standard for pulp therapy, especially for its regenerative properties and sealing capability.

✅ Indications for Apexogenesis with MTA
Apexogenesis using MTA is indicated under the following clinical conditions:

▪️ Immature permanent teeth with open apices
▪️ Vital pulp tissue without signs of necrosis
▪️ Reversible pulpitis or minimal inflammation
▪️ Pulp exposure due to trauma or caries (recent exposure)
▪️ Absence of periapical pathology
These criteria are essential to ensure the success of vital pulp therapy and continued root maturation.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy Materials Comparison: Calcium Hydroxide vs. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Primary Molars ... Pulpotomy is a widely accepted vital pulp therapy for primary molars affected by carious exposure or traumatic injury, aiming to preserve the radicular pulp and maintain tooth function until natural exfoliation.

✅ Biological Properties of MTA
MTA is widely used due to its favorable biological characteristics:

▪️ High biocompatibility
▪️ Ability to stimulate hard tissue (dentin bridge) formation
▪️ Excellent sealing capacity
▪️ Alkaline pH promoting antimicrobial activity
Additionally, MTA has been associated with reduced pulpal inflammation and improved healing outcomes compared to traditional materials.

✅ Clinical Technique (Step-by-Step Protocol)

1. Diagnosis and Case Selection
▪️ Clinical and radiographic evaluation
▪️ Confirmation of pulp vitality
▪️ Assessment of root development stage

2. Anesthesia and Isolation
▪️ Local anesthesia
▪️ Rubber dam isolation to ensure asepsis

3. Caries Removal and Access
▪️ Conservative removal of infected dentin
▪️ Exposure of pulp tissue under sterile conditions

4. Pulpotomy Procedure
▪️ Partial (Cvek) or full pulpotomy depending on inflammation
▪️ Hemostasis achieved using sterile saline or NaOCl

5. Placement of MTA
▪️ MTA is placed directly over the pulp tissue
▪️ A thickness of approximately 2–4 mm is recommended
▪️ Moist cotton pellet placed to allow proper setting

6. Temporary Restoration
▪️ Placement of a temporary restoration
▪️ Final restoration performed after MTA setting

7. Follow-Up
▪️ Clinical and radiographic monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months
▪️ Evaluation of:
° Continued root development
° Apical closure
° Absence of pathology

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

✅ Clinical Outcomes and Success Rates
Studies report high success rates (up to 96%) in posterior teeth treated with MTA apexogenesis.

Favorable outcomes include:
▪️ Continued root elongation
▪️ Thickening of dentinal walls
▪️ Apical closure
▪️ Absence of symptoms or pathology

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Zinc Oxide Eugenol vs Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform in Pulpectomy ... This review analyzes clinical performance, resorption behavior, success rates, and limitations, based on current evidence.

💬 Discussion
MTA has significantly improved the prognosis of apexogenesis compared to calcium hydroxide. Its ability to induce predictable dentin bridge formation and maintain pulp vitality makes it a preferred material in pediatric and adolescent patients.
However, limitations persist:
▪️ Long setting time
▪️ Potential tooth discoloration
▪️ Higher cost
▪️ Handling difficulties
Despite these drawbacks, current evidence suggests that MTA provides comparable or superior outcomes to other pulpotomy agents, although further high-quality randomized trials are needed.

✍️ Conclusion
Apexogenesis with MTA represents a reliable and evidence-based approach for managing immature permanent teeth with vital pulp. The procedure allows for continued root development, improved structural integrity, and long-term tooth preservation, making it a cornerstone in modern pediatric endodontics.

🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Perform early diagnosis and intervention to preserve pulp vitality
▪️ Use rubber dam isolation to ensure aseptic conditions
▪️ Prefer partial pulpotomy when feasible to preserve more pulp tissue
▪️ Ensure long-term follow-up to monitor root development
▪️ Consider alternative materials (e.g., biodentine) when esthetics are critical

📚 References

✔ Ageel, B. M., El Meligy, O. A., & Quqandi, S. M. (2023). Mineral trioxide aggregate apexogenesis: A systematic review. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, 15(Suppl 1), S11–S17. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_530_22
✔ Mousivand, S., Sheikhnezami, M., Moradi, S., Koohestanian, N., & Jafarzadeh, H. (2022). Evaluation of the outcome of apexogenesis in traumatised anterior and carious posterior teeth using mineral trioxide aggregate: A 5-year retrospective study. Australian Endodontic Journal, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12583
✔ Corbella, S., Ferrara, G., El Kabbaney, A., & Taschieri, S. (2014). Apexification, apexogenesis and regenerative endodontic procedures: A review of the literature. Minerva Stomatologica, 63(11–12), 375–389.
✔ Yahya, A. A., & Alkhatib, A. R. (2024). Treatment modalities of apexogenesis: An overview. Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, 24(2), 453–466.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry
► Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification
► Pulpotomy Failure in Primary Teeth: Causes, Early Warning Signs, and Evidence-Based Prevention

Zinc Oxide Eugenol vs Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform in Pulpectomy

Pulpectomy in primary teeth requires obturation materials that ensure antimicrobial efficacy, biocompatibility, and physiological resorption. The comparison between zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes remains clinically relevant.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

This review analyzes clinical performance, resorption behavior, success rates, and limitations, based on current evidence.
Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Pulpectomy is a key procedure in pediatric dentistry aimed at preserving infected primary teeth. The ideal obturation material should exhibit resorbability synchronized with root resorption, antimicrobial properties, and minimal toxicity to periapical tissues. Historically, ZOE has been widely used, whereas calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes have gained popularity due to improved biological properties.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

✅ Material Characteristics

Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE)
▪️ Composition: Zinc oxide powder and eugenol liquid
▪️ Properties: Antimicrobial, radiopaque, good sealing ability
▪️ Limitations: Slow resorption, potential irritation to periapical tissues

Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform Pastes (e.g., Vitapex, Metapex)
▪️ Composition: Calcium hydroxide, iodoform, silicone oil vehicle
▪️ Properties: Strong antimicrobial activity, high biocompatibility, resorbable
▪️ Clinical advantage: Resorption closely follows physiological root resorption

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

✅ Clinical Performance

Success Rates
▪️ Both materials demonstrate high clinical success rates (>80%)
▪️ Recent studies suggest slightly higher radiographic success with calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes

Evidence:
▪️ Coll et al. (2020) reported comparable success rates, with better resorption patterns in calcium hydroxide–iodoform materials.
▪️ Ramar & Mungara (2010) found higher success in Vitapex compared to ZOE in primary teeth pulpectomies.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... This article presents an updated, evidence-based analysis of its indications, clinical technique, advantages, limitations, and safety considerations.

✅ Resorption Behavior

ZOE:
▪️ Slow resorption
▪️ May remain in periapical tissues after root resorption

Calcium hydroxide–iodoform:
▪️ Rapid and controlled resorption
▪️ Resorbs in harmony with primary tooth exfoliation

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

✅ Antimicrobial Activity

▪️ Both materials exhibit broad antimicrobial effects
▪️ Calcium hydroxide–iodoform shows enhanced activity due to:
° High pH (Ca(OH)₂)
° Iodoform bactericidal effect

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols ... Management of pulpal infections in primary teeth must follow AAPD evidence-based protocols, prioritizing pulp vitality and infection control.

✅ Advantages and Limitations

1. ZOE
Advantages
▪️ Long history of clinical use
▪️ Good sealing properties
▪️ Cost-effective

Limitations
▪️ Delayed resorption
▪️ Potential foreign body reaction
▪️ May interfere with eruption of permanent teeth

2. Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform
Advantages
▪️ Biocompatibility and resorbability
▪️ Superior antimicrobial action
▪️ Favorable effect on periapical healing

Limitations
▪️ Risk of over-resorption within canals
▪️ Possible void formation over time
▪️ Higher cost compared to ZOE

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards ... For decades, calcium hydroxide–based materials played a central role in endodontics due to their antimicrobial properties and biological compatibility.

💬 Discussion
Current literature favors calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes due to their biological compatibility and resorption profile, which aligns with the natural exfoliation process. While ZOE remains a viable option, its slow resorption and potential interference with permanent tooth eruption are notable concerns.

Clinical decision-making should consider:
▪️ Patient age
▪️ Extent of root resorption
▪️ Presence of periapical pathology

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Zinc Oxide–Eugenol Paste in Modern Dentistry: Current Uses, Benefits, and Limitations ... Understanding where ZOE still fits in modern dental practice—and where it no longer does—is essential for evidence-based decision-making and patient safety.

✍️ Conclusion
Both ZOE and calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes are effective for pulpectomy in primary teeth. However, calcium hydroxide–iodoform materials demonstrate superior biological behavior, particularly in terms of resorption and tissue compatibility, making them the preferred option in modern pediatric dentistry.

🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Prefer calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes in cases requiring predictable resorption
▪️ Use ZOE cautiously, especially in teeth close to exfoliation
▪️ Avoid overfilling regardless of material
▪️ Base material selection on clinical and radiographic findings

📚 References

✔ Coll, J. A., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Chen, C. Y., Al Shamsi, S., & Dhar, V. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of nonvital pulp therapy for primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 42(4), 256–461.
✔ Ramar, K., & Mungara, J. (2010). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 28(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.60470
✔ Mortazavi, M., & Mesbahi, M. (2004). Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 14(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00562.x
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 384–392.
✔ Trairatvorakul, C., & Chunlasikaiwan, S. (2008). Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide–eugenol vs calcium hydroxide–iodoform paste in primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 18(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00886.x

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pulpotomy Materials Comparison: Calcium Hydroxide vs. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Primary Molars
► Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: Best Filling Materials (ZOE, Vitapex, and Metapex)
► Limitations of CTZ and Antibiotic Pastes in Pediatric Endodontics: Resistance, Tooth Discoloration, and Safety Concerns

TheraCal in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits & Limits

TheraCal is a light-cured, resin-modified calcium silicate material widely used in pediatric dentistry for vital pulp therapy. Its bioactive properties and ease of handling have positioned it as an alternative to traditional materials such as calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA).

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

This article reviews the versions, properties, clinical applications, advantages, and limitations of TheraCal in pediatric patients.
Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Vital pulp therapy in primary dentition requires materials that promote pulp healing, dentin bridge formation, and bacterial control. TheraCal has emerged as a modern biomaterial combining calcium release and resin-based handling properties, addressing some limitations of conventional pulp-capping agents.
Its application in pediatric dentistry is increasing due to its clinical efficiency and reduced chair time, which are critical factors in managing young patients.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Medications for Pulp Capping in Primary Teeth: Indications, Composition, and Clinical Management ... Its success largely depends on the material or medication used, which must be biocompatible, promote tissue repair, and provide an adequate marginal seal.

✅ What Is TheraCal?
TheraCal is a light-cured, resin-modified calcium silicate liner/base designed for direct and indirect pulp capping. It releases calcium ions, promoting mineralization and pulp healing.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Partial pulpotomy vs. Conventional (full) pulpotomy in primary teeth — a comparative, evidence-based review ... This article compares partial pulpotomy and conventional (full/coronal) pulpotomy in primary teeth, focusing on definitions, technique differences, materials, clinical outcomes, and benefits.

✅ Versions of TheraCal

TheraCal LC (Light-Cured):
▪️ Most commonly used version
▪️ Indicated for pulp capping and as a liner

TheraCal PT (Pulpotomy Treatment):
▪️ Designed for pulpotomy procedures
▪️ Enhanced handling and consistency for coronal pulp therapy

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Complete Guide to Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth: Materials, Techniques, and Success Rates ... Understanding the differences between pulpotomy, pulpectomy, indirect pulp treatment (IPT), and apexification is essential for evidence-based care.

✅ Properties of TheraCal

▪️ Calcium ion release → stimulates reparative dentin formation
▪️ Alkaline pH → antibacterial effect
▪️ Light-curing capability → immediate setting
▪️ Low solubility compared to calcium hydroxide
▪️ Resin-modified matrix → improved handling

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons ... Pulpotec® is a radiopaque, non‑resorbable medicament widely used for pulpotomy/pulpitis treatment in vital primary and immature permanent molars, as well as for emergency root canal dressings.

✅ Clinical Uses in Pediatric Dentistry

▪️ Direct pulp capping
▪️ Indirect pulp capping
▪️ Pulpotomy (TheraCal PT)
▪️ Base/liner under restorations

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulp Capping in Dentistry: How the Dental Pulp Is Protected (Updated Clinical Guide) ... Modern bioactive materials—including calcium hydroxide, MTA, and Biodentine—have significantly improved success rates by promoting dentin bridge formation and reducing pulpal inflammation.

✅ Benefits and Advantages

▪️ Reduced chair time due to light curing
▪️ Immediate placement of restorative material
▪️ Improved seal and marginal adaptation
▪️ Enhanced patient cooperation in pediatric settings
▪️ Bioactivity supporting dentin bridge formation

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards ... However, advances in biomechanical preparation, three-dimensional obturation, and material science have redefined the requirements of an ideal endodontic sealer.

✅ Limitations

▪️ Presence of resin components may affect biocompatibility
▪️ Lower long-term evidence compared to MTA
▪️ Technique sensitivity (requires proper isolation)
▪️ Potential polymerization shrinkage

📊 Step-by-step Instructions: TheraCal Application in Pediatric Dentistry

Clinical Step	Key Action	Clinical Consideration
Diagnosis and Case Selection	Confirm vital pulp and absence of irreversible pathology	Essential for treatment success
Cavity Preparation	Remove caries and clean the cavity	Avoid pulp overexposure when possible
Isolation	Apply rubber dam	Prevents contamination and moisture interference
Material Placement	Apply TheraCal in a thin layer (≤1 mm)	Do not overfill; ensure adaptation
Light Curing	Cure according to manufacturer instructions	Ensure adequate light intensity
Final Restoration	Place definitive restorative material	Immediate restoration is possible

💬 Discussion
TheraCal represents a significant advancement in pulp therapy materials, particularly in pediatric dentistry where efficiency and ease of use are essential. Compared to traditional calcium hydroxide, it demonstrates superior physical properties and reduced solubility.
However, concerns remain regarding its resin content and long-term biological performance, especially when compared to materials such as MTA, which have extensive clinical validation. Current evidence supports its use in selective cases, but emphasizes the importance of proper case selection and technique.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

✍️ Conclusion
TheraCal is a promising biomaterial in pediatric dentistry, offering bioactivity, convenience, and improved clinical handling. While it is not a complete replacement for traditional materials, it serves as a valuable option in vital pulp therapy, particularly when efficiency is required. Further long-term studies are necessary to fully establish its clinical reliability.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use TheraCal in well-selected vital pulp cases
▪️ Ensure proper isolation to optimize outcomes
▪️ Prefer TheraCal PT for pulpotomy procedures
▪️ Consider alternative materials (e.g., MTA) in cases requiring proven long-term success
▪️ Follow manufacturer instructions for curing time and thickness

📚 References

✔ Bortoluzzi, E. A., Niu, L. N., Palani, C. D., El-Awady, A. R., Hammond, B. D., Pei, D. D., ... & Tay, F. R. (2014). Cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential of silicate calcium cements as potential protective materials for pulpal revascularization. Dental Materials, 30(5), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.002
✔ Gandolfi, M. G., Siboni, F., Prati, C. (2012). Properties of a novel light-cured calcium-silicate direct pulp capping material. International Endodontic Journal, 45(6), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02014.x
✔ Hebling, J., Lessa, F. C. R., Nogueira, I., & de Souza Costa, C. A. (2019). Cytotoxicity of resin-based light-cured liners applied in deep cavities. Operative Dentistry, 44(3), E97–E105. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-282-L
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Best Materials for Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: MTA vs. Biodentine vs. Ferric Sulfate
► CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol
► Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry

MI Paste Plus: Uses, Benefits, and How It Works

MI Paste Plus is a topical remineralizing agent widely used in preventive and restorative dentistry. Its formulation combines casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) with fluoride, enhancing enamel remineralization and reducing demineralization.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 How to Remove White Spots on Teeth: Evidence-Based Dental Techniques ... White spots on teeth are a frequent esthetic concern in dental practice. These lesions may affect both primary and permanent dentition and often represent alterations in enamel mineralization or structure.

This article provides an updated, evidence-based review of its composition, mechanisms of action, clinical indications, dosage protocols, and benefits.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Dental caries remains a prevalent global condition characterized by cycles of demineralization and remineralization. Advances in preventive dentistry have introduced biomimetic agents such as CPP-ACP-based products, which promote mineral deposition in early enamel lesions. MI Paste Plus represents an evolution of these technologies by incorporating fluoride, thereby improving remineralization efficacy.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review ... This review explores its mechanism of action, clinical indications, advantages, and limitations compared to other fluoride therapies used in pediatric dentistry.

✅ Composition and Mechanism of Action

Key Components
▪️ CPP-ACP (Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate)
▪️ Fluoride (900 ppm)
▪️ Water-based topical cream with bioavailable calcium and phosphate ions

Mechanism of Action
CPP stabilizes calcium and phosphate ions in an amorphous state, maintaining a reservoir of bioavailable minerals at the tooth surface. When combined with fluoride, this system:
▪️ Enhances fluorapatite formation
▪️ Promotes subsurface enamel remineralization
▪️ Reduces enamel solubility under acidic conditions

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: Dosage, Frequency, and Current Controversies ... This article provides an updated academic review of fluoride use in pediatric dentistry, focusing on dosage, frequency, and current controversies.

✅ Clinical Uses

Primary Indications
▪️ Early enamel caries (white spot lesions)
▪️ Post-orthodontic demineralization
▪️ Dental hypersensitivity
▪️ Xerostomia-related demineralization
▪️ High caries risk patients

Adjunctive Uses
▪️ After bleaching procedures
▪️ Following professional prophylaxis
▪️ In pediatric preventive protocols

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Fluorosis vs. Enamel Demineralization: How to Identify Clinical Differences and Choose the Right Treatment ... Dental fluorosis and enamel demineralization are common enamel alterations that may present with similar clinical appearances but differ significantly in etiology, progression, and management.

✅ Dosage and Methods of Application

Recommended Dosage
▪️ Apply a pea-sized amount per quadrant or as directed by the clinician.

Application Protocol
1. Perform oral hygiene prior to application.
2. Apply with a clean finger, cotton swab, or tray.
3. Spread evenly over tooth surfaces.
4. Allow to remain undisturbed for 3–5 minutes.
5. Avoid rinsing immediately; expectorate excess only.
6. Refrain from eating or drinking for 30 minutes.

Frequency
▪️ Once or twice daily, depending on caries risk and clinical indication.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Dental Sealants in Children: Types, Benefits, and Evidence-Based Application Technique ... Dental sealants in children are a cornerstone of preventive pediatric dentistry and play a critical role in reducing occlusal caries in permanent molars.

✅ Benefits of MI Paste Plus

▪️ Enhanced remineralization compared to fluoride alone
▪️ Reduction of white spot lesions
▪️ Decreased dentin hypersensitivity
▪️ Non-invasive caries management
▪️ Safe for pediatric and orthodontic patients (with supervision)

📊 Summary Table: MI Paste Plus Clinical Overview

Component / Feature	Clinical Application	Key Considerations
CPP-ACP + Fluoride	Enhances enamel remineralization	Contraindicated in milk protein allergy
White spot lesions	Non-invasive lesion reversal	Requires patient compliance
Dentin hypersensitivity	Reduces sensitivity symptoms	Effect varies among patients
Post-orthodontic care	Prevents enamel demineralization	Adjunct, not replacement for fluoride
Application protocol	Topical daily use (1–2 times)	Technique-sensitive

💬 Discussion
The synergistic effect of CPP-ACP and fluoride has been extensively investigated. Studies suggest that the addition of fluoride to CPP-ACP enhances remineralization more effectively than either agent alone. This is particularly relevant in managing early enamel lesions and preventing lesion progression.
However, limitations exist. The efficacy of MI Paste Plus is dependent on patient compliance and salivary conditions. Additionally, it is contraindicated in individuals with milk protein allergies, as CPP is derived from casein. Variability in clinical outcomes may also arise from differences in application frequency and lesion severity.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Fluoride Safety in Children: What Parents Need to Know (Updated Guide) ... Updated guidelines from the American Dental Association (ADA) and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) emphasize that fluoride is safe when used correctly, making parental education essential.

✍️ Conclusion
MI Paste Plus represents a scientifically supported approach to non-invasive caries management. Its dual-action formulation provides significant benefits in enamel remineralization and sensitivity reduction. When incorporated into preventive protocols, it can improve long-term oral health outcomes.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use in patients with early enamel lesions and high caries risk
▪️ Incorporate into post-orthodontic care protocols
▪️ Educate patients on correct application techniques
▪️ Avoid use in individuals with casein allergies
▪️ Combine with routine fluoride therapy for optimal results

📚 References

✔ Reynolds, E. C. (1997). Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. Journal of Dental Research, 76(9), 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345970760091101
✔ Reynolds, E. C. (2008). Calcium phosphate-based remineralization systems: Scientific evidence? Australian Dental Journal, 53(3), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00061.x
✔ Cochrane, N. J., Cai, F., Huq, N. L., Burrow, M. F., & Reynolds, E. C. (2010). New approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. Journal of Dental Research, 89(11), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376046
✔ Walsh, L. J. (2009). Contemporary technologies for remineralization therapies: A review. International Dentistry SA, 11(6), 6–16.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Dental Remineralization Therapies: Updated Techniques, Products, and Clinical Protocols
► What are the causes of white spots on teeth?
► Chewing Gum with Xylitol vs. Other Delivery Forms: Which Works Best to Prevent Dental Caries?

Flowable Composite Resins in Dentistry: Advantages, Limitations, and Clinical Applications

Flowable composite resins are low-viscosity resin-based restorative materials widely used in modern restorative dentistry. Their improved handling characteristics and ability to adapt to complex cavity geometries have made them valuable in minimally invasive treatments.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Chemical Caries Removal: Drill-Free Technique, Materials, and Clinical Application ... This article reviews the causes, diagnosis, and treatment of black stains in children, integrating current scientific evidence and updated clinical recommendations.

Originally introduced in the mid-1990s as modified composite resins with reduced filler content, flowable composites were designed to enhance adaptability, marginal sealing, and ease of placement. However, their mechanical limitations initially restricted their use to small restorations or as liner materials.

Advertisement

Recent developments in next-generation flowable composites have improved filler technology and mechanical strength, expanding their clinical applications.

✅ Characteristics of Flowable Composite Resins
Flowable composites differ from conventional hybrid or nanohybrid composites in several physical and chemical properties.

Reduced Viscosity
The primary characteristic of flowable composites is their low viscosity, which allows the material to flow easily into small or irregular cavity areas.

Lower Filler Content
Traditional flowable composites contain 37–53% filler by volume, compared with approximately 60–70% in conventional composites. This reduction improves flow but affects mechanical properties.

High Wettability and Adaptation
The low viscosity improves adaptation to cavity walls, potentially reducing void formation and microleakage.

Polymerization Characteristics
Flowable composites generally exhibit higher polymerization shrinkage due to increased resin matrix content.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Early Childhood Caries: Current Concepts and Innovative Treatment Approaches ... This review explores the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and modern evidence-based treatments, emphasizing emerging approaches such as silver diamine fluoride, bioactive restorative materials, and minimally invasive dentistry.

✅ Clinical Indications
Flowable composites are indicated in several clinical situations due to their handling properties and adaptability.

Small Class I Restorations
They can be used in minimally invasive occlusal restorations where occlusal forces are limited.

Class V Cervical Lesions
Flowable composites are frequently used in non-carious cervical lesions because of their flexibility and stress absorption.

Pit and Fissure Sealants
Some clinicians use flowable composites as sealant materials due to their penetration ability.

Liner or Base Material
Flowable composites are commonly used as a liner beneath conventional composite restorations to improve adaptation.

Preventive Resin Restorations (PRR)
Their flow properties allow conservative treatment of early occlusal lesions.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Webinar: The SMART pediatric dentistry: Minimally Invasive Restorative Techniques - Dra. Jeanette MacLean ... This article reviews the causes, diagnosis, and treatment of black stains in children, integrating current scientific evidence and updated clinical recommendations.

✅ Advantages of Flowable Composite Resins
Several clinical advantages explain the popularity of flowable composites.

Excellent Adaptation
Their fluid consistency allows better penetration into micro-irregularities, improving marginal adaptation.

Ease of Placement
Flowable composites can be applied directly from a syringe, facilitating precise and controlled placement.

Reduced Risk of Air Entrapment
The material’s flow reduces the likelihood of void formation during placement.

Stress Absorption
The slightly lower modulus of elasticity may help absorb polymerization stress, particularly in cervical lesions.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Glass Ionomer Cement in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits, Uses, and Step-by-Step Application Guide ... This article explores its characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, clinical applications, and a step-by-step guide for proper use.

✅ Limitations and Disadvantages
Despite their advantages, flowable composites present several limitations.

Lower Mechanical Strength
Because of their lower filler content, traditional flowable composites have reduced wear resistance and flexural strength compared with conventional composites.

Higher Polymerization Shrinkage
Increased resin matrix content leads to greater polymerization contraction, which may contribute to marginal gaps.

Limited Use in High-Stress Areas
Flowable composites should generally not be used alone in large posterior restorations subjected to heavy occlusal forces.

Increased Water Sorption
Higher resin content can lead to greater water absorption and potential discoloration over time.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Zinc Oxide Eugenol in Dentistry: Is It Still Used in Modern Clinical Practice? ... However, advances in dental materials science and adhesive dentistry have raised an important question: Is zinc oxide eugenol still relevant in contemporary dental practice?

✅ Next-Generation Flowable Composites
Recent technological developments have led to high-strength flowable composites, sometimes referred to as bulk-fill flowable or highly filled flowables.

Key improvements include:
▪️ Increased filler loading
▪️ Enhanced mechanical properties
▪️ Reduced polymerization shrinkage stress
▪️ Improved depth of cure

These materials may now be used as bulk-fill base layers in posterior restorations, followed by a conventional composite occlusal layer.
Examples of modern advancements include nanofilled and nanohybrid flowable composites that combine improved mechanical strength with superior handling.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Black Stains on Primary Teeth in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Management ... This article reviews the causes, diagnosis, and treatment of black stains in children, integrating current scientific evidence and updated clinical recommendations.

💬 Discussion
The role of flowable composite resins continues to evolve in restorative dentistry. While early formulations were limited to liner applications or small restorations, modern materials have significantly improved mechanical properties.
However, clinicians must still recognize that material selection should be based on biomechanical considerations. Flowable composites offer superior adaptation and handling but should not replace conventional restorative composites in high-load-bearing areas.
Current research supports their use as liners, sealants, and minimally invasive restorative materials, particularly when combined with layered restorative techniques.

✍️ Conclusion
Flowable composite resins represent versatile restorative materials with excellent handling and adaptation properties. While their mechanical limitations restrict their use in large stress-bearing restorations, advances in material science have expanded their indications in modern minimally invasive dentistry.
Appropriate case selection and correct layering techniques remain essential for long-term clinical success.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use flowable composites as liners under conventional composite restorations.
▪️ Indicate them for small occlusal restorations and cervical lesions.
▪️ Avoid their exclusive use in large posterior load-bearing cavities.
▪️ Consider next-generation high-strength flowable composites when improved mechanical performance is required.
▪️ Apply proper adhesive protocols to ensure optimal marginal sealing.

📚 References

✔ Ilie, N., & Hickel, R. (2011). Resin composite restorative materials. Australian Dental Journal, 56(Suppl 1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x
✔ Bayne, S. C., Thompson, J. Y., Swift, E. J., Stamatiades, P., & Wilkerson, M. (1998). A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. Journal of the American Dental Association, 129(5), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
✔ Ilie, N., & Stark, K. (2014). Curing behavior of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Journal of Dentistry, 42(8), 977–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.012
✔ Garoushi, S., Vallittu, P., & Lassila, L. (2013). Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dental Materials Journal, 32(4), 542–549. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-259

📌 More Recommended Items

► Controversial Materials in Pediatric Dentistry: What Remains Safe Today?
► Pulpotomy Materials Comparison: Calcium Hydroxide vs. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Primary Molars
► Fluoride Varnish for Preventing and Treating White Spot Lesions: Clinical Evidence and Best Practices

Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: Best Filling Materials (ZOE, Vitapex, and Metapex)

Pulpectomy is a widely accepted endodontic procedure for infected or necrotic primary teeth, aiming to preserve the tooth until its natural exfoliation. The success of this procedure depends not only on adequate canal debridement but also on the selection of an appropriate root canal filling material.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Clinical Pulpectomy Protocol: Updated Step-by-Step Guide ... Its main goal is to eliminate infection, maintain tooth functionality until natural exfoliation, and preserve dental space.

An ideal obturation material for primary teeth should be resorbable, biocompatible, antibacterial, and harmless to the developing permanent successor. This article reviews the most commonly used pulpectomy filling materials—Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE), Vitapex®, and Metapex®—focusing on their mechanisms of action, commercial formulations, advantages, and limitations.

Advertisement

✅ Pulpectomy Filling Materials in Primary Teeth

1. Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE)
ZOE has been historically considered the standard filling material for primary teeth pulpectomy.

Mechanism of action:
ZOE exerts antibacterial and sedative effects through the release of eugenol, which inhibits microbial growth and reduces inflammation.
Commercial formulations:
▪️ Dental Zinc Oxide Powder + Eugenol Liquid (multiple manufacturers)

2. Vitapex® (Calcium Hydroxide + Iodoform Paste)
Vitapex® is a premixed paste containing calcium hydroxide and iodoform, specifically designed for pediatric endodontics.

Mechanism of action:
▪️ Calcium hydroxide provides antibacterial activity through high pH
▪️ Iodoform enhances antimicrobial effects and promotes resorption
Commercial product:
▪️ Vitapex® (Neo Dental Chemical Products, Japan)

📌 Recommended Article :

Webinar 🔽 Webinar: Pulpectomy: Clinical Tips and Tricks in Paediatric Dentistry ... Pulpectomy is performed when there is an infectious process (fistula or abscess), chronic inflammation, or pulp necrosis.

3. Metapex® (Calcium Hydroxide + Iodoform Paste)
Metapex® has a composition similar to Vitapex® but differs in viscosity and delivery system.

Mechanism of action:
▪️ Sustained antimicrobial activity
▪️ Favorable resorption rate synchronized with physiological root resorption
Commercial product:
▪️ Metapex® (Meta Biomed, Korea)

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

✅ Advantages and Disadvantages of Common Pulpectomy Materials

1. Advantages
▪️ ZOE: Long-term stability and ease of handling
▪️ Vitapex® and Metapex®: Faster resorption, superior biocompatibility, and minimal interference with permanent tooth eruption

2. Disadvantages
▪️ ZOE may resorb slower than primary roots, potentially affecting succedaneous teeth
▪️ Calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes may resorb prematurely, increasing reinfection risk in some cases

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pharmacological Protocols for Pediatric Dental Emergencies: A 2026 Clinical Guide ... Pharmacological intervention plays a critical role in controlling pain, infection, inflammation, and anxiety, while minimizing adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance.

💬 Discussion
Recent systematic reviews suggest that calcium hydroxide–iodoform-based materials demonstrate higher clinical and radiographic success rates compared to ZOE in primary teeth pulpectomies. Their ability to resorb in harmony with root resorption makes them particularly suitable for pediatric patients.
However, ZOE remains clinically acceptable, especially in settings where cost, availability, or operator familiarity are determining factors. Material selection should be individualized based on root morphology, degree of infection, and expected exfoliation timeline.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Prefer Vitapex® or Metapex® in teeth with advanced physiological root resorption
▪️ Use ZOE cautiously in teeth close to exfoliation
▪️ Avoid overfilling, particularly with non-resorbable materials
▪️ Perform regular radiographic follow-up to monitor resorption patterns

✍️ Conclusion
Pulpectomy in primary teeth requires filling materials that are resorbable, antibacterial, and biocompatible. While ZOE continues to be used, Vitapex® and Metapex® represent modern alternatives with improved biological behavior and clinical outcomes. Evidence-based material selection enhances long-term success and protects the developing permanent dentition.

📊 Comparative Table: Pulpectomy Filling Materials in Primary Teeth

Material and Composition	Clinical Advantages	Clinical Limitations
Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE)	Good sealing ability, antibacterial effect, long clinical history	Slow resorption, potential irritation to permanent tooth germ
Vitapex® (Calcium Hydroxide + Iodoform)	Excellent resorption, high biocompatibility, easy syringe delivery	Possible premature resorption, higher cost
Metapex® (Calcium Hydroxide + Iodoform)	Resorption synchronized with roots, strong antimicrobial action	Risk of overfilling, technique-sensitive

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 405–423.
✔ Coll, J. A., Seale, N. S., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Al Shamali, S., & Graham, L. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–26.
✔ Mortazavi, M., & Mesbahi, M. (2004). Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 14(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00591.x
✔ Reddy, S., Ramakrishna, Y., & Kumar, V. (2014). Evaluation of clinical and radiographic success of Metapex and zinc oxide eugenol as root canal filling materials in primary teeth. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 32(3), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.135831

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pulpotomy Materials Comparison: Calcium Hydroxide vs. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Primary Molars
► Why Pulp Therapy Fails: Risk Factors, Clinical Errors, and Evidence-Based Solutions
► Pulp Necrosis in Primary Teeth: Diagnosis and Evidence-Based Management

Zinc Oxide Eugenol in Dentistry: Is It Still Used in Modern Clinical Practice?

Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) has been a cornerstone material in dentistry for over a century due to its sedative properties, ease of manipulation, and low cost.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

However, advances in dental materials science and adhesive dentistry have raised an important question: Is zinc oxide eugenol still relevant in contemporary dental practice?

Advertisement

This article critically reviews the composition, clinical applications, disadvantages, and current alternatives to ZOE, providing an evidence-based perspective on its role in modern dentistry.

✅ Composition of Zinc Oxide Eugenol
ZOE is formed through an acid–base reaction between zinc oxide powder and eugenol liquid.

▪️ Powder: Zinc oxide (ZnO), often with additives such as zinc acetate to accelerate setting
▪️ Liquid: Eugenol (a phenolic compound derived from clove oil)
The setting reaction produces zinc eugenolate, which is responsible for the material’s physical properties and biological effects.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

✅ Clinical Uses of Zinc Oxide Eugenol
Despite reduced popularity, ZOE continues to be used in selected clinical situations:

▪️ Temporary restorative material
▪️ Temporary luting cement
▪️ Base or liner under non-resin restorations
▪️ Root canal sealer (traditional formulations)
▪️ Periodontal surgical dressings
▪️ Intermediate restorative material (IRM derivatives)
Its sedative effect on the dental pulp has historically made it attractive in deep cavities and emergency treatments.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Zinc Oxide–Eugenol Paste in Modern Dentistry: Current Uses, Benefits, and Limitations ... Understanding where ZOE still fits in modern dental practice—and where it no longer does—is essential for evidence-based decision-making and patient safety.

✅ Disadvantages and Limitations of ZOE
Although biologically soothing, ZOE presents significant drawbacks that limit its use in modern dentistry:

▪️ Interference with resin polymerization, making it incompatible with adhesive restorations
▪️ Low mechanical strength, unsuitable for long-term restorations
▪️ High solubility in oral fluids, leading to marginal leakage
▪️ Potential cytotoxicity of eugenol at high concentrations
▪️ Limited adhesion to tooth structure
These limitations have driven the development and adoption of alternative materials.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

✅ Materials That Have Replaced Zinc Oxide Eugenol
Modern dentistry increasingly favors materials with improved biocompatibility, adhesion, and mechanical performance, including:

▪️ Calcium hydroxide–based liners
▪️ Glass ionomer cements (GIC)
▪️ Resin-modified glass ionomers (RMGIC)
▪️ Calcium silicate–based materials (e.g., MTA, Biodentine)
▪️ Resin-based temporary and permanent materials
These materials offer superior sealing ability, compatibility with adhesive systems, and enhanced longevity.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons ... Pulpotec® is a radiopaque, non‑resorbable medicament widely used for pulpotomy/pulpitis treatment in vital primary and immature permanent molars, as well as for emergency root canal dressings.

💬 Discussion
ZOE remains a material of historical and limited clinical relevance rather than a first-line option. While it still has niche applications—particularly in temporary procedures or specific endodontic uses—its incompatibility with resin-based materials significantly restricts its role in modern restorative dentistry.
Current trends emphasize bioactive, adhesive, and mechanically stable materials, which better align with minimally invasive and long-term treatment philosophies.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Avoid ZOE under resin-based restorations
▪️ Consider modern bioactive materials for pulp protection
▪️ Use ZOE only for short-term or specific indications
▪️ Evaluate patient needs, restoration type, and material compatibility
▪️ Stay updated with evidence-based material selection guidelines

✍️ Conclusion
Zinc oxide eugenol is still used in dentistry, but its role is increasingly limited. While it offers sedative and antimicrobial benefits, its mechanical weakness and incompatibility with adhesive systems have led to its replacement by more advanced materials. Contemporary dental practice favors alternatives that provide superior durability, biocompatibility, and clinical performance.

📊 Comparative Table: Zinc Oxide Eugenol and Its Modern Alternatives

Material Type	Clinical Indications	Main Limitations
Zinc Oxide Eugenol	Temporary restorations, sedative base	Inhibits resin polymerization, low strength
Glass Ionomer Cement	Base, liner, temporary and permanent restorations	Lower fracture resistance than composites
Resin-Modified GIC	Adhesive base and liner	Moisture sensitivity during placement
Calcium Silicate Materials	Pulp capping and dentin regeneration	Higher cost and longer setting time

📚 References

✔ Anusavice, K. J., Shen, C., & Rawls, H. R. (2013). Phillips’ science of dental materials (12th ed.). Elsevier.
✔ American Dental Association. (2022). Dental materials guidance and compatibility considerations. Journal of the American Dental Association, 153(4), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2021.11.012
✔ Hargreaves, K. M., & Berman, L. H. (2020). Cohen’s pathways of the pulp (12th ed.). Elsevier.
✔ Sidhu, S. K., & Nicholson, J. W. (2016). A review of glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 7(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb7030016

📌 More Recommended Items

► Best Materials for Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: MTA vs. Biodentine vs. Ferric Sulfate
► Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence
► Webinar: Bioceramics in Pediatric Dentistry - Dr. Patrick Ruck

Controversial Materials in Pediatric Dentistry: What Remains Safe Today?

In pediatric dentistry, the selection of restorative and pulpal materials must balance biocompatibility, effectiveness, and safety. Historical materials such as formocresol and dental amalgam have been debated for potential toxicity, while modern alternatives like bioactive cements (e.g., MTA, Biodentine) and adhesive restorative materials are widely accepted.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

This review synthesizes evidence on controversial dental materials and their current clinical safety status in pediatric care, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Dentistry for children and adolescents involves unique biological and behavioral considerations, requiring materials that are safe, effective, and minimally invasive. Materials that were historically part of pediatric practice now face scrutiny due to evolving evidence around toxicity, biocompatibility, and environmental impact. Clinicians must understand both contested and recommended materials to optimize pediatric patient outcomes.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

✅ Controversial Dental Materials in Pediatric Practice

Formocresol
Formocresol has been used as a pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth due to its bactericidal and devitalizing properties. However, concerns about formaldehyde, a hazardous compound classified as potentially carcinogenic, have led to reevaluation of its routine use in children. Evidence suggests that under low exposure conditions, formaldehyde metabolism may not pose significant carcinogenic risk, yet modern practice favors biocompatible alternatives.

Dental Amalgam
Dental amalgam, an alloy containing mercury, remains controversial due to its mercury content and perceptions of toxicity. Although organizations such as the ADA and FDA acknowledge amalgam’s longstanding safety record, its use in pediatric patients has declined, with emphasis shifting toward resin-based and glass ionomer materials in many programs due to aesthetic and minimally invasive preferences.

Bisphenol A (BPA) Derivatives
Resin-based composites and sealants may contain BPA derivatives, raising concerns about endocrine-disrupting potential. Available evidence highlights transient BPA release after placement, but the clinical benefits of resin-based materials generally outweigh potential exposure when proper techniques are followed.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives ... Newer agents such as bioceramic putties continue to expand treatment possibilities. Understanding the clinical performance and limitations of each material is essential for evidence-based decision-making in pulpotomies.

✅ Current Safe and Recommended Materials

Bioactive Cements and Vital Pulp Therapy Agents
Materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine have demonstrated favorable outcomes in vital pulp therapy, promoting dentinogenesis and exhibiting high biocompatibility. These materials represent contemporary choices for maintaining pulp vitality in primary dentition.

Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Restoratives
Glass ionomer cements offer chemical adhesion and fluoride release, aligning with minimally invasive principles, though moisture sensitivity can limit performance. Resin composites provide improved aesthetics and adaptability, yet require optimal isolation for long-term success.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons ... Pulpotec® is a radiopaque, non‑resorbable medicament widely used for pulpotomy/pulpitis treatment in vital primary and immature permanent molars, as well as for emergency root canal dressings.

💬 Discussion
The transition away from controversial materials like formocresol and amalgam reflects a broader trend toward biocompatible and patient-centered care. While historical evidence attests to the effectiveness of certain legacy materials, modern pediatric dentistry prioritizes bioactivity, regenerative potential, and minimization of systemic exposure. Adoption of contemporary materials should be contextualized within evidence-based protocols and comprehensive risk assessment.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use bioactive cements (MTA/Biodentine) for vital pulp therapy when indicated.
▪️ Prefer glass ionomer or resin-based restoratives in primary dentition, considering isolation quality and caries risk.
▪️ Avoid routine use of formocresol in pulpotomy unless alternatives are unavailable and benefits outweigh theoretical risks.
▪️ Reserve amalgam for limited situations where other materials are contraindicated, recognizing regulatory and educational trends.

✍️ Conclusion
Controversies surrounding materials in pediatric dentistry have prompted shifts toward safer, more biologically favorable options. Clinicians must remain informed by current evidence when selecting materials for restorative and pulpal procedures. While some traditional materials may still be used judiciously, modern bioactive and adhesive materials represent the safest and most effective choices for pediatric patients today.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2025–2026). Pediatric restorative dentistry: Pediatric restorative dentistry reference manual. AAPD.
✔ Fuks, A. B. (2015). The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry: New insights and reappraising the tradition. Pediatric Dentistry, 37(2), 125–132.
✔ Milnes, A. R. (2006). Persuasive evidence that formocresol use in pediatric dentistry is safe. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 72(3), 247–248.
✔ Peker, O. (2024). Contemporary dental materials used in pediatric dentistry. Dental and Medical Journal, 6(2), 70–85.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Chemical Caries Removal: Drill-Free Technique, Materials, and Clinical Application
► Is Dental Amalgam Being Phased Out Worldwide?
► Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Updated Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence