Pulpectomy in primary teeth requires obturation materials that ensure antimicrobial efficacy, biocompatibility, and physiological resorption. The comparison between zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes remains clinically relevant.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.This review analyzes clinical performance, resorption behavior, success rates, and limitations, based on current evidence.
Advertisement
✅ Introduction
Pulpectomy is a key procedure in pediatric dentistry aimed at preserving infected primary teeth. The ideal obturation material should exhibit resorbability synchronized with root resorption, antimicrobial properties, and minimal toxicity to periapical tissues. Historically, ZOE has been widely used, whereas calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes have gained popularity due to improved biological properties.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.✅ Material Characteristics
Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE)
▪️ Composition: Zinc oxide powder and eugenol liquid
▪️ Properties: Antimicrobial, radiopaque, good sealing ability
▪️ Limitations: Slow resorption, potential irritation to periapical tissues
Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform Pastes (e.g., Vitapex, Metapex)
▪️ Composition: Calcium hydroxide, iodoform, silicone oil vehicle
▪️ Properties: Strong antimicrobial activity, high biocompatibility, resorbable
▪️ Clinical advantage: Resorption closely follows physiological root resorption
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.✅ Clinical Performance
Success Rates
▪️ Both materials demonstrate high clinical success rates (>80%)
▪️ Recent studies suggest slightly higher radiographic success with calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes
Evidence:
▪️ Coll et al. (2020) reported comparable success rates, with better resorption patterns in calcium hydroxide–iodoform materials.
▪️ Ramar & Mungara (2010) found higher success in Vitapex compared to ZOE in primary teeth pulpectomies.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... This article presents an updated, evidence-based analysis of its indications, clinical technique, advantages, limitations, and safety considerations.✅ Resorption Behavior
ZOE:
▪️ Slow resorption
▪️ May remain in periapical tissues after root resorption
Calcium hydroxide–iodoform:
▪️ Rapid and controlled resorption
▪️ Resorbs in harmony with primary tooth exfoliation
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.✅ Antimicrobial Activity
▪️ Both materials exhibit broad antimicrobial effects
▪️ Calcium hydroxide–iodoform shows enhanced activity due to:
° High pH (Ca(OH)₂)
° Iodoform bactericidal effect
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols ... Management of pulpal infections in primary teeth must follow AAPD evidence-based protocols, prioritizing pulp vitality and infection control.✅ Advantages and Limitations
1. ZOE
Advantages
▪️ Long history of clinical use
▪️ Good sealing properties
▪️ Cost-effective
Limitations
▪️ Delayed resorption
▪️ Potential foreign body reaction
▪️ May interfere with eruption of permanent teeth
2. Calcium Hydroxide–Iodoform
Advantages
▪️ Biocompatibility and resorbability
▪️ Superior antimicrobial action
▪️ Favorable effect on periapical healing
Limitations
▪️ Risk of over-resorption within canals
▪️ Possible void formation over time
▪️ Higher cost compared to ZOE
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards ... For decades, calcium hydroxide–based materials played a central role in endodontics due to their antimicrobial properties and biological compatibility.💬 Discussion
Current literature favors calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes due to their biological compatibility and resorption profile, which aligns with the natural exfoliation process. While ZOE remains a viable option, its slow resorption and potential interference with permanent tooth eruption are notable concerns.
Clinical decision-making should consider:
▪️ Patient age
▪️ Extent of root resorption
▪️ Presence of periapical pathology
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Zinc Oxide–Eugenol Paste in Modern Dentistry: Current Uses, Benefits, and Limitations ... Understanding where ZOE still fits in modern dental practice—and where it no longer does—is essential for evidence-based decision-making and patient safety.✍️ Conclusion
Both ZOE and calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes are effective for pulpectomy in primary teeth. However, calcium hydroxide–iodoform materials demonstrate superior biological behavior, particularly in terms of resorption and tissue compatibility, making them the preferred option in modern pediatric dentistry.
🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Prefer calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes in cases requiring predictable resorption
▪️ Use ZOE cautiously, especially in teeth close to exfoliation
▪️ Avoid overfilling regardless of material
▪️ Base material selection on clinical and radiographic findings
📚 References
✔ Coll, J. A., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Chen, C. Y., Al Shamsi, S., & Dhar, V. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of nonvital pulp therapy for primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 42(4), 256–461.
✔ Ramar, K., & Mungara, J. (2010). Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpectomies using three root canal filling materials. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, 28(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.60470
✔ Mortazavi, M., & Mesbahi, M. (2004). Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 14(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00562.x
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 384–392.
✔ Trairatvorakul, C., & Chunlasikaiwan, S. (2008). Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide–eugenol vs calcium hydroxide–iodoform paste in primary molars. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 18(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00886.x
📌 More Recommended Items
► Pulpotomy Materials Comparison: Calcium Hydroxide vs. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Primary Molars
► Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: Best Filling Materials (ZOE, Vitapex, and Metapex)
► Limitations of CTZ and Antibiotic Pastes in Pediatric Endodontics: Resistance, Tooth Discoloration, and Safety Concerns









