One-Visit Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: Is It Safe and Effective?

Pulpectomy is a common endodontic procedure in pediatric dentistry aimed at preserving primary teeth affected by irreversible pulp pathology. Traditionally performed over multiple visits, the procedure has evolved with improved materials and techniques.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

One-visit pulpectomy in primary teeth has gained attention for its efficiency, child-friendly approach, and comparable success rates. However, questions remain regarding its safety and long-term effectiveness.

Advertisement

✅ What Is One-Visit Pulpectomy?
One-visit pulpectomy involves complete removal of necrotic or inflamed pulp tissue, canal disinfection, obturation, and coronal sealing in a single appointment. Advances in instrumentation, irrigation protocols, and obturating materials have made this approach increasingly feasible.
The primary objective is to eliminate infection while minimizing patient discomfort and treatment time.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

✅ Indications and Case Selection
Appropriate case selection is critical. One-visit pulpectomy is generally indicated when:

▪️ The child is cooperative or behavior management is limited
▪️ There is no acute swelling or systemic involvement
▪️ Canal anatomy is manageable
▪️ Adequate isolation can be achieved
Teeth with extensive periapical pathology or uncontrolled infection may still benefit from multi-visit treatment.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

✅ Safety Considerations
Current evidence suggests that one-visit pulpectomy is safe when proper disinfection and obturation protocols are followed. The use of resorbable filling materials compatible with physiological root resorption is essential.

Potential concerns include:
▪️ Incomplete microbial elimination
▪️ Risk of postoperative flare-ups
However, studies show no significant increase in postoperative complications compared to multi-visit approaches.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

✅ Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
Clinical success is evaluated based on:

▪️ Absence of pain or swelling
▪️ Radiographic resolution or stability of periapical lesions
▪️ Normal exfoliation timing
Success rates of one-visit pulpectomy are comparable to multi-visit protocols, particularly when modern materials such as calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes are used.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Clinical Pulpectomy Protocol: Updated Step-by-Step Guide ... Pulpectomy is a predictable and effective procedure when performed following a rigorous clinical protocol. The selection of obturation material plays a crucial role in the long-term success of the treatment.

💬 Discussion
The debate between one-visit and multi-visit pulpectomy mirrors broader discussions in endodontics. While multi-visit procedures allow for intracanal medicaments, evidence increasingly supports that effective mechanical and chemical disinfection in a single visit can achieve similar outcomes. In pediatric dentistry, reduced chair time and improved patient cooperation are significant advantages.

✍️ Conclusion
One-visit pulpectomy in primary teeth is a safe and effective treatment option when appropriate case selection and strict clinical protocols are followed. Its advantages in pediatric behavior management and treatment efficiency make it an attractive alternative to traditional multi-visit approaches.

📌 Recommended Article :

PDF 🔽 What is the best pulp dressing for pulpotomies in primary teeth? - Review ... Different pulp dressings have been used in pulpotomies, each with different characteristics and properties. The article we share compares all pulp dressings to determine which is the most effective.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Select cases carefully based on infection status and child cooperation
▪️ Use resorbable obturating materials compatible with primary teeth
▪️ Ensure adequate irrigation and canal disinfection
▪️ Reserve multi-visit pulpectomy for acute or complex cases

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 325–334.
✔ Mortazavi, M., & Mesbahi, M. (2004). Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 14(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00544.x
✔ Raslan, N., & Wetzel, W. E. (2006). Ex vivo evaluation of root canal obturation quality in primary incisors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 16(5), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00750.x
✔ Coll, J. A., et al. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–27.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Manual of diagnosis and pulp treatment in non-vital primary teeth
► Pulp Therapy Procedures Manual for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth
► Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure

Modern Alternatives to Calcium Hydroxide Apexification

Management of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp has historically relied on calcium hydroxide apexification. However, advances in biomaterials and regenerative biology have significantly changed clinical decision-making.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Calcium hydroxide continues to be a valuable material in pediatric dentistry, particularly in regions where access to advanced biomaterials is limited. Its strong antimicrobial activity and ability to induce reparative dentinogenesis are undeniable strengths.

Today, regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apical barriers are increasingly preferred due to their predictable outcomes, reduced treatment time, and superior biological response.

Advertisement

✅ Traditional Calcium Hydroxide Apexification: Limitations
Calcium hydroxide apexification aims to induce the formation of a calcified apical barrier over several months. Despite its historical importance, multiple disadvantages have been documented:

▪️ Prolonged treatment time, often exceeding 6–18 months
▪️ Increased risk of root fracture due to long-term dentin exposure
▪️ Multiple patient visits, compromising compliance
▪️ Unpredictable apical closure morphology
Long-term calcium hydroxide use weakens radicular dentin, increasing susceptibility to cervical fractures.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Open Apex Management in Traumatized Teeth: Latest Evidence-Based Recommendations ... Open apex management in traumatized teeth aims to control infection, preserve tooth structure, and promote continued root development or apical closure using evidence-based techniques.

✅ MTA Apical Barriers: A More Predictable Alternative
The introduction of MTA revolutionized apexification by allowing immediate apical barrier formation in one or two visits.

Key advantages include:
▪️ Excellent biocompatibility and bioactivity
▪️ Superior sealing ability
▪️ Reduced treatment duration
▪️ High clinical success rates
MTA apical barriers provide a reliable artificial stop, enabling effective obturation without prolonged intracanal medication.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards ... Despite these advantages, their use as permanent sealers has increasingly been questioned as treatment goals shifted toward predictable, long-term apical sealing and structural integrity.

✅ Regenerative Endodontics: A Paradigm Shift
Regenerative endodontic procedures aim to restore pulp vitality and promote continued root development, rather than simply closing the apex.

Clinical benefits include:
▪️ Increase in root length and dentin thickness
▪️ Improved fracture resistance
▪️ Potential revascularization of the pulp space
Regenerative endodontics aligns with modern minimally invasive and biologically driven dentistry, especially in young patients.

📊 Comparative Table: Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Biocompatibility	Excellent tissue tolerance and minimal inflammatory response	May cause mild initial inflammation during setting
Sealing ability	Superior marginal seal even in moist environments	Technique-sensitive placement
Bioactivity	Stimulates hard tissue formation and cementogenesis	Long setting time compared to newer bioceramics
Clinical longevity	High long-term success rates in apexification and perforation repair	Higher cost than traditional materials

💬 Discussion
While calcium hydroxide apexification remains a viable option in selected cases, current evidence strongly favors MTA apical barriers and regenerative techniques. MTA provides predictable outcomes when root development cannot be restored, whereas regenerative endodontics offers true tissue healing and maturation when biological conditions allow.
Case selection, clinician expertise, and patient age play critical roles in choosing the appropriate modality.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry ... The evolution of pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry has shifted from traditional medicaments to bioactive biomaterials that promote regeneration and tissue healing.

✍️ Conclusion
Traditional calcium hydroxide apexification is being replaced due to its biological limitations and mechanical risks. MTA apical barriers and regenerative endodontics represent evidence-based, modern alternatives that improve clinical outcomes, reduce treatment time, and preserve tooth structure.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Prefer regenerative endodontics in immature teeth with favorable apical anatomy
▪️ Use MTA apical barriers when regeneration is not feasible
▪️ Limit long-term calcium hydroxide use due to fracture risk
▪️ Base treatment decisions on radiographic findings, patient age, and compliance

📚 References

✔ American Association of Endodontists. (2016). Clinical considerations for a regenerative procedure. Journal of Endodontics, 42(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.017
✔ Banchs, F., & Trope, M. (2004). Revascularization of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. Journal of Endodontics, 30(4), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00003
✔ Torabinejad, M., & Parirokh, M. (2010). Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review—Part II. Journal of Endodontics, 36(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.010
✔ Andreasen, J. O., Farik, B., & Munksgaard, E. C. (2002). Long-term calcium hydroxide as a root canal dressing may increase risk of root fracture. Dental Traumatology, 18(3), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00097.x

📌 More Recommended Items

► Complete Guide to Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth: Materials, Techniques, and Success Rates
► Triple Antibiotic Paste in Dentistry: Benefits, Clinical Applications, and Evidence-Based Advantages
► Updated Antibiotic Therapy in Pediatric Dentistry: Evidence-Based Protocols for Acute Infections

Triple Antibiotic Paste in Dentistry: Benefits, Clinical Applications, and Evidence-Based Advantages

Triple antibiotic paste (TAP) has become an important intracanal medicament in modern dentistry, particularly in regenerative endodontic procedures and infection control.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

Originally introduced to eliminate resistant polymicrobial infections, TAP combines multiple antibiotics to achieve broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity while preserving host tissues. Its use has expanded in both permanent and immature teeth, especially in cases where conventional disinfection methods are insufficient.

Advertisement

✅ What Is Triple Antibiotic Paste?
Triple antibiotic paste is a combination of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, and minocycline, formulated to target a wide range of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria commonly found in infected root canals.

Key characteristics include:
▪️ Broad-spectrum antimicrobial coverage
▪️ Ability to penetrate dentinal tubules
▪️ Effectiveness against biofilm-associated bacteria
▪️ Use as an intracanal medicament rather than a definitive filling material

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity has made it a key intracanal medicament in regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) and complex pulpal infections.

✅ Benefits of Triple Antibiotic Paste
The popularity of TAP is largely due to its strong antimicrobial properties and versatility. Major benefits include:

▪️ Effective elimination of polymicrobial endodontic infections
▪️ Reduction of bacterial load in necrotic and immature teeth
▪️ Improved outcomes in regenerative endodontic therapy
▪️ Enhanced disinfection without aggressive mechanical instrumentation

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

✅ Clinical Applications of Triple Antibiotic Paste
Triple antibiotic paste is mainly used in advanced endodontic scenarios where conventional calcium hydroxide may be insufficient.

Common clinical applications include:
▪️ Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs)
▪️ Management of necrotic immature permanent teeth
▪️ Persistent apical periodontitis with resistant bacteria
▪️ Disinfection prior to revascularization or apexification
▪️ Selected cases in traumatized teeth with pulp necrosis

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

✅ Advantages Compared to Other Intracanal Medicaments
Compared with traditional materials, TAP offers unique antimicrobial synergy.

Advantages include:
▪️ Superior antibacterial efficacy against Enterococcus faecalis
▪️ Synergistic action of combined antibiotics
▪️ Effective biofilm disruption
▪️ Lower reliance on aggressive canal instrumentation
However, these benefits must be balanced against known drawbacks.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Clinical Pulpectomy Protocol: Updated Step-by-Step Guide ... Pulpectomy is a predictable and effective procedure when performed following a rigorous clinical protocol. The selection of obturation material plays a crucial role in the long-term success of the treatment.

✅ Limitations and Concerns
Despite its effectiveness, TAP is not without limitations.

Important concerns include:
▪️ Risk of tooth discoloration (primarily due to minocycline)
▪️ Potential development of antibiotic resistance
▪️ Cytotoxicity at high concentrations
▪️ Not intended for long-term or routine use
▪️ Possible allergic reactions in susceptible patients

📊 Comparative Table: Triple Antibiotic Paste in Modern Dentistry

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Antimicrobial Spectrum	Broad coverage against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria	Overuse may contribute to antibiotic resistance
Use in Regenerative Endodontics	Effective canal disinfection without extensive instrumentation	Requires careful concentration control to avoid cytotoxicity
Tooth Discoloration Risk	Can be reduced with modified formulations	Minocycline may cause intrinsic staining
Clinical Handling	Easy intracanal placement	Not suitable as a long-term medicament

💬 Discussion
Current evidence supports the use of triple antibiotic paste as a short-term intracanal medicament in selected cases, particularly in regenerative endodontics. However, concerns regarding antibiotic stewardship and cytotoxicity have prompted the development of modified formulations, such as double antibiotic paste (DAP) or TAP without minocycline. Clinicians must weigh antimicrobial benefits against biological risks when selecting this medicament.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Medications Used in Pulpotomies: Properties, Drawbacks, and Brand Names ... Pulpotomy is a conservative dental procedure aimed at preserving the vitality of the radicular pulp after removing the affected coronal pulp. This treatment is common in primary teeth and young permanent teeth.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use TAP only in well-indicated cases, such as regenerative endodontic therapy.
▪️ Apply at low concentrations to minimize cytotoxic effects.
▪️ Limit duration of use to reduce the risk of resistance.
▪️ Consider alternative medicaments when esthetics are critical.
▪️ Always obtain a thorough medical and allergy history before use.

✍️ Conclusion
Triple antibiotic paste remains a valuable tool in modern endodontics, particularly for complex infections and regenerative procedures. While its antimicrobial efficacy is well documented, responsible use is essential to avoid adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. When applied judiciously and based on current evidence, TAP can significantly improve clinical outcomes in challenging endodontic cases.

📚 References

✔ Hoshino, E., Kurihara-Ando, N., Sato, I., Uematsu, H., Sato, M., Kota, K., & Iwaku, M. (1996). In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. International Endodontic Journal, 29(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01173.x
✔ American Association of Endodontists. (2021). Clinical considerations for regenerative procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 47(3), 354–365.
✔ Ruparel, N. B., Teixeira, F. B., Ferraz, C. C. R., & Diogenes, A. (2012). Direct effect of intracanal medicaments on survival of stem cells of the apical papilla. Journal of Endodontics, 38(10), 1372–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.018

📌 More Recommended Items

► Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards
► Why Pulp Therapy Fails: Risk Factors, Clinical Errors, and Evidence-Based Solutions
► Pulp Necrosis in Primary Teeth: Diagnosis and Evidence-Based Management

Pulpotomy Failure in Primary Teeth: Causes, Early Warning Signs, and Evidence-Based Prevention

Pulpotomy is one of the most common vital pulp therapies in pediatric dentistry, aiming to preserve primary teeth affected by deep caries while maintaining function until natural exfoliation.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

Despite its high success rates when properly indicated, pulpotomy failure remains a clinically relevant concern, often leading to pain, infection, or premature tooth loss.

Advertisement

Understanding why pulpotomies fail, how to identify early warning signs, and how to prevent unfavorable outcomes is essential for long-term success and optimal pediatric oral health.

✅ What Is Pulpotomy Failure?
Pulpotomy failure occurs when inflammation or infection progresses beyond the coronal pulp, affecting the radicular pulp or surrounding tissues. This failure may be clinical, radiographic, or both, and can appear weeks or months after treatment.
Failure does not necessarily indicate poor technique alone—it is often the result of multifactorial biological and restorative factors.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Pulp Therapy Fails: Risk Factors, Clinical Errors, and Evidence-Based Solutions ... Pulp therapy is a cornerstone of both pediatric and adult restorative dentistry. However, despite advances in materials and techniques, treatment failure remains a relevant clinical challenge.

✅ Main Causes of Pulpotomy Failure

1. Incorrect Case Selection
Performing pulpotomy on teeth with irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp significantly increases failure risk.
➤ Common red flags include:
▪️ Spontaneous pain
▪️ Swelling or sinus tract
▪️ Pathologic mobility
▪️ Furcation radiolucency at baseline

2. Inadequate Hemostasis
Failure to achieve proper hemostasis after coronal pulp removal suggests radicular pulp inflammation, which compromises prognosis.

3. Bacterial Microleakage
Poor coronal seal allows salivary and bacterial contamination, leading to reinfection of the pulp tissue.

4. Suboptimal Restorative Coverage
Lack of full coronal coverage, especially in multi-surface lesions, increases the risk of restoration breakdown and microleakage.

5. Material-Related Factors
Although modern materials show improved outcomes, incorrect manipulation or improper placement can reduce their effectiveness.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth is a cornerstone of pediatric dental treatment. Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

✅ Early Clinical and Radiographic Signs of Failure
Early detection is critical to avoid more invasive treatment.

➤ Clinical Signs
▪️ Persistent or recurrent pain
▪️ Gingival swelling or abscess formation
▪️ Increased tooth mobility
▪️ Sensitivity to percussion

➤ Radiographic Signs
▪️ Furcation radiolucency
▪️ Internal or external root resorption
▪️ Widening of the periodontal ligament
▪️ Periapical pathology
Radiographic follow-up is essential, as some failures remain asymptomatic in early stages.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Calcium hydroxide has been one of the most widely used biomaterials in pediatric dentistry for several decades. Its biological properties, high alkalinity, and ability to stimulate hard tissue formation have made it a cornerstone in pulp therapy procedures.

💬 Discussion
Recent evidence confirms that pulpotomy success is highly dependent on accurate diagnosis, strict asepsis, and durable coronal restoration. Systematic reviews demonstrate that failures are more commonly linked to diagnostic errors and restorative leakage than to the pulpotomy medicament itself.
Modern bioactive materials have improved outcomes; however, they do not compensate for poor case selection or inadequate isolation. Therefore, pulpotomy should be considered a biologically sensitive procedure, not merely a mechanical intervention.

✅ How to Prevent Pulpotomy Failure

Evidence-Based Preventive Strategies
▪️ Strict adherence to case selection criteria
▪️ Achieve complete hemostasis within a few minutes
▪️ Use rubber dam isolation whenever possible
▪️ Ensure hermetic coronal sealing
▪️ Prefer full-coverage restorations in posterior primary teeth
▪️ Schedule regular clinical and radiographic follow-up
Prevention begins before the bur touches the tooth.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulp Polyps in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options in Pediatric Dentistry ... Chronic hyperplastic pulpitis, commonly referred to as a pulp polyp, is a non-neoplastic, benign proliferation of pulpal tissue. It is often observed in children and adolescents, attributed to their rich pulpal vascularity and strong immune response.

✍️ Conclusion
Pulpotomy failure in primary teeth is largely preventable when evidence-based protocols are followed. Proper diagnosis, meticulous technique, and durable restoration are far more influential than the choice of medicament alone. Early recognition of failure signs allows timely intervention, preserving function and preventing infection-related complications in pediatric patients.

📊 Comparative Table: Key Factors Influencing Pulpotomy Outcomes

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Proper case selection	Improves long-term success and pulp healing	Requires accurate clinical judgment
Effective coronal seal	Prevents bacterial microleakage	Dependent on restoration quality
Full-coverage restoration	Enhances durability and tooth survival	Higher cost and chair time
Regular follow-up	Allows early detection of failure	Relies on patient compliance

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 380–392.
✔ Coll, J. A., Seale, N. S., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Al Shamali, S., & Graham, L. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–23.
✔ Holan, G., & Fuks, A. B. (2013). A comparison of pulpotomy using ferric sulfate and mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry, 35(1), 13–18.
✔ Peng, L., Ye, L., Tan, H., & Zhou, X. (2007). Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: A meta-analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 103(6), e40–e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.008

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons
► Clinical Pulpectomy Protocol: Updated Step-by-Step Guide
► Irrigants in Pediatric Pulpectomies: Key Benefits, Properties, and U.S. Commercial Brands

Dental Abscesses: Types, Characteristics, Treatments, and Etiological Classification

Dental abscesses are localized collections of pus caused by bacterial infections affecting the teeth and surrounding structures. They represent a frequent dental emergency and, if left untreated, may lead to serious local or systemic complications.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Periapical Abscess vs Periodontal Abscess: Key Differences, Similarities, and Treatments ... Dental abscesses represent one of the most common acute infections in dentistry. Among them, the periapical abscess and the periodontal abscess are distinct entities with overlapping clinical features, which often complicates diagnosis.

Understanding the types of dental abscesses, their etiological classification, and appropriate treatment strategies is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective clinical management.

Advertisement

✅ Etiological Classification of Dental Abscesses
The etiological classification categorizes dental abscesses based on the origin of infection, which directly influences treatment decisions.

1. Periapical Abscess
A periapical abscess originates from pulpal necrosis, commonly caused by deep caries, trauma, or failed endodontic therapy. Bacteria spread through the root canal system, resulting in inflammation and suppuration at the periapical tissues.

Key features:
▪️ Non-vital tooth
▪️ Pain on percussion or biting
▪️ Periapical radiolucency

2. Periodontal Abscess
A periodontal abscess develops from an infection within a periodontal pocket, often associated with advanced periodontitis or foreign body impaction.

Key features:
▪️ Tooth usually remains vital
▪️ Localized gingival swelling and purulent discharge
▪️ Deep periodontal probing depths

3. Gingival Abscess
A gingival abscess is limited to the marginal gingiva and does not involve deeper periodontal structures or bone.

Key features:
▪️ Localized gingival swelling
▪️ Often caused by foreign body penetration
▪️ No attachment loss

4. Pericoronal Abscess
A pericoronal abscess occurs around the soft tissues covering a partially erupted tooth, most commonly mandibular third molars.

Key features:
▪️ Associated with pericoronitis
▪️ Pain, swelling, and sometimes trismus
▪️ Local inflammatory signs

5. Combined Endodontic–Periodontal Abscess
This type involves both pulpal and periodontal infection pathways, making diagnosis and treatment more complex.

Key features:
▪️ Mixed clinical and radiographic signs
▪️ Poor prognosis if not correctly identified
▪️ Requires multidisciplinary management

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Dental Abscesses in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Management in 2025 ... Dental abscesses in primary dentition represent one of the most common pediatric dental emergencies. They can lead to severe pain, swelling, and systemic involvement if not treated promptly.

✅ Clinical Characteristics of Dental Abscesses
Common clinical manifestations include:

▪️ Severe localized pain
▪️ Facial or intraoral swelling
▪️ Purulent discharge
▪️ Fever or systemic symptoms in advanced cases
Radiographic evaluation, pulp vitality tests, and periodontal probing are essential diagnostic tools.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Dental Abscess, Fistula, Cellulitis, and Ludwig's Angina: Differences, Symptoms & Treatment ... Odontogenic infections such as dental abscess, fistula, cellulitis, and Ludwig's angina are frequent but vary in severity and required intervention. Understanding their differences is essential for timely treatment and complication prevention.

✅ Treatment of Dental Abscesses
Treatment aims to eliminate the source of infection, provide drainage, and prevent complications.

▪️ Periapical abscess: Root canal therapy or extraction, drainage, antibiotics if systemic involvement exists
▪️ Periodontal abscess: Drainage, scaling and root planing, periodontal surgery when indicated
▪️ Gingival abscess: Removal of foreign body and drainage
▪️ Pericoronal abscess: Irrigation, drainage, operculectomy or extraction
▪️ Combined abscess: Coordinated endodontic and periodontal therapy

Antibiotics are adjunctive, not definitive, and should be prescribed only when systemic signs are present.

⬇️ Download the image

💬 Discussion
Dental abscesses share common infectious mechanisms but differ significantly in etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment. Misclassification can lead to inappropriate management and treatment failure. Evidence emphasizes the importance of etiology-based diagnosis using vitality testing and imaging. Early intervention reduces the risk of spread to fascial spaces and life-threatening conditions such as deep neck infections.

✍️ Conclusion
Dental abscesses are serious odontogenic infections requiring prompt diagnosis and etiology-based treatment. Accurate classification—particularly distinguishing between periapical and periodontal origins—is critical for successful outcomes. Evidence-based management combining local treatment and systemic therapy when indicated ensures effective infection control and patient safety.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Appropriate Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Odontogenic Infections: Guidelines for Dentists and Dental Students ... This article provides evidence-based, clinically practical guidance for dentists and dental students on the appropriate use of antibiotics in pediatric odontogenic infections.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations

▪️ Always determine pulp vitality and periodontal status
▪️ Use antibiotics only when systemic involvement is present
▪️ Address the primary etiological factor, not only symptoms
▪️ Refer promptly in cases of facial space involvement

📚 References

✔ Herrera, D., Roldán, S., & Sanz, M. (2000). The periodontal abscess: A review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 27(6), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027006377.x
✔ Nair, P. N. R. (2006). On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: A review. International Endodontic Journal, 39(4), 249–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01099.x
✔ Newman, M. G., Takei, H., Klokkevold, P. R., & Carranza, F. A. (2018). Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology (13th ed.). Elsevier.
✔ Siqueira, J. F., & Rôças, I. N. (2013). Microbiology and treatment of acute apical abscesses. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00082-12

📌 More Recommended Items

► Dental Abscess in Children: Early Recognition, Systemic Risks, and Evidence-Based Management
► Key Differences Between Pediatric and Adult Odontogenic Infections: Updated Clinical Guidelines
► Clindamycin in Pediatric Dentistry: Indications, Dosage, and Clinical Considerations

Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards

For decades, calcium hydroxide–based materials played a central role in endodontics due to their antimicrobial properties and biological compatibility. However, advances in biomechanical preparation, three-dimensional obturation, and material science have redefined the requirements of an ideal endodontic sealer.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

Today, substantial evidence demonstrates that calcium hydroxide as a long-term endodontic sealer no longer satisfies modern biomechanical and clinical expectations, particularly regarding sealing ability, stability, and long-term outcomes.

Advertisement

✅ Calcium Hydroxide Sealers: Historical Perspective
Calcium hydroxide sealers were originally adopted because of their:

▪️ High alkalinity, promoting antibacterial effects
▪️ Ability to stimulate hard tissue formation
▪️ Relative ease of handling

Despite these advantages, their use as permanent sealers has increasingly been questioned as treatment goals shifted toward predictable, long-term apical sealing and structural integrity.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Calcium hydroxide has been one of the most widely used biomaterials in pediatric dentistry for several decades. Its biological properties, high alkalinity, and ability to stimulate hard tissue formation have made it a cornerstone in pulp therapy procedures.

✅ Why Calcium Hydroxide Fails Modern Biomechanical Standards
Modern endodontics demands materials that maintain dimensional stability, resist dissolution, and provide a fluid-tight seal under functional stresses. Evidence shows that calcium hydroxide sealers exhibit:

▪️ High solubility over time, leading to leakage
▪️ Poor adhesion to dentin and gutta-percha
▪️ Inability to support monoblock concepts
▪️ Reduced performance in warm vertical compaction techniques

These deficiencies directly compromise the biomechanical integrity of the root canal system.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

✅ Sealing Ability and Microleakage
Multiple in vitro and clinical studies confirm that calcium hydroxide sealers demonstrate inferior sealing ability compared with epoxy resin–based and bioceramic sealers. Progressive dissolution allows bacterial penetration, undermining long-term endodontic success.
Importantly, antibacterial activity does not compensate for inadequate sealing, as persistent microleakage remains the primary cause of post-treatment disease.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

✅ Comparison with Modern Endodontic Sealers
Contemporary sealers—such as epoxy resin, calcium silicate–based (bioceramic), and MTA-derived materials—offer:

▪️ Low solubility
▪️ Superior dentinal adaptation
▪️ Chemical bonding or bioactivity
▪️ Compatibility with modern obturation techniques

These properties align with current biomechanical and biological principles of root canal therapy.

📊 Comparative Table: Calcium Hydroxide Sealers vs Modern Endodontic Sealers

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Antibacterial activity	High initial pH with antimicrobial effect	Effect decreases over time and does not prevent leakage
Sealing ability	Easy placement in the canal	Inferior apical and coronal seal compared to resin and bioceramic sealers
Solubility	Gradual release of calcium ions	High long-term solubility leading to voids and microleakage
Biomechanical compatibility	Biocompatible with periapical tissues	Fails to reinforce root structure or support monoblock obturation

💬 Discussion
While calcium hydroxide remains valuable as an intracanal medicament, its role as a definitive endodontic sealer is scientifically outdated. Current evidence underscores that long-term success depends more on durable sealing and biomechanical stability than on transient antimicrobial effects. The persistence of calcium hydroxide sealers in some clinical settings reflects habit rather than evidence-based practice.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence ... The combination of calcium hydroxide and iodoform paste has become a cornerstone in pediatric endodontics, especially in the pulpectomy of primary teeth.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Avoid the use of calcium hydroxide–based sealers as permanent obturation materials
▪️ Prefer epoxy resin or bioceramic sealers for long-term sealing
▪️ Reserve calcium hydroxide for short-term intracanal medication
▪️ Align material selection with modern obturation techniques and biomechanical principles
▪️ Update clinical protocols according to current endodontic evidence

✍️ Conclusion
Calcium hydroxide as a long-term endodontic sealer no longer meets modern biomechanical standards due to its high solubility, inadequate sealing ability, and incompatibility with contemporary obturation concepts. Advances in material science have produced superior alternatives that ensure predictable, durable, and biologically sound outcomes, making the routine use of calcium hydroxide sealers as definitive materials unjustifiable in modern endodontic practice.

📚 References

✔ Ørstavik, D., Kerekes, K., & Eriksen, H. M. (2001). The quality of root canal fillings and the incidence of apical periodontitis. International Endodontic Journal, 34(7), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00415.x
✔ Siqueira, J. F., & Rôças, I. N. (2008). Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 34(11), 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028
✔ Viapiana, R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru, J. M., Tanomaru-Filho, M., Camilleri, J. (2014). Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. International Endodontic Journal, 47(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12154
✔ Zhang, W., Li, Z., & Peng, B. (2009). Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 107(6), e79–e82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.024

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pulp Polyps in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options in Pediatric Dentistry
► Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence
► Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical Applications and Therapeutic Benefits

Why Pulp Therapy Fails: Risk Factors, Clinical Errors, and Evidence-Based Solutions

Pulp therapy is a cornerstone of both pediatric and adult restorative dentistry. However, despite advances in materials and techniques, treatment failure remains a relevant clinical challenge.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... The use of bioactive materials, accurate diagnosis, and periodic follow-up are essential to maintain oral health and prevent premature tooth loss in pediatric patients.

Understanding why pulp therapy fails is essential to improve prognosis, reduce retreatment, and preserve tooth structure. This article reviews the main biological, technical, and restorative factors associated with failure and presents evidence-based solutions supported by current literature.

Advertisement

✅ Biological Risk Factors for Pulp Therapy Failure
Biological factors often determine the baseline prognosis before treatment begins.Key contributors include:

▪️ Incorrect pulp diagnosis (reversible vs. irreversible pulpitis)
▪️ Advanced bacterial contamination
▪️ Undetected pulpal necrosis
▪️ Compromised immune response

Accurate case selection is one of the most critical determinants of pulp therapy success.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

✅ Clinical and Technical Errors
Many failures are directly related to operator-dependent factors.
Common errors include:

▪️ Inadequate isolation, leading to salivary and bacterial contamination
▪️ Incomplete caries removal, leaving infected dentin
▪️ Over-instrumentation or pulp tissue trauma
▪️ Improper placement of pulp capping or pulpotomy materials

Studies consistently show that lack of rubber dam isolation significantly increases failure rates.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Antibiotics Contraindicated During Pregnancy: Risks and Safer Alternatives in Dental Practice ... In dental practice, infections may require systemic antibiotic therapy; however, not all antibiotics are safe during pregnancy.

✅ Material-Related Factors
The choice and handling of materials play a decisive role.
Frequent issues include:

▪️ Incorrect manipulation of calcium-based materials
▪️ Use of outdated or low-biocompatibility agents
▪️ Poor sealing ability of restorative materials

Modern bioactive materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium silicate cements demonstrate superior outcomes due to their biocompatibility, sealing ability, and bioinductive properties.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... Understanding their clinical presentation, etiology, and management in both adults and children is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

✅ Restorative and Post-Treatment Factors
Even a technically correct pulp therapy can fail if the final restoration is inadequate.
Critical aspects:

▪️ Coronal microleakage
▪️ Delayed placement of definitive restoration
▪️ Poor marginal adaptation
▪️ Occlusal overload

A hermetic coronal seal is as important as the pulpal procedure itself.

📊 Comparative Table: Factors Influencing Pulp Therapy Outcomes

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Accurate Pulp Diagnosis	Improves case selection and prognosis	Requires clinical experience and diagnostic tools
Use of Bioactive Materials	Promotes dentin bridge formation and healing	Higher cost and technique sensitivity
Rubber Dam Isolation	Reduces bacterial contamination	May be challenging in uncooperative patients
Definitive Coronal Seal	Prevents microleakage and reinfection	Failure if restoration is delayed or poorly adapted

💬 Discussion
Current evidence confirms that pulp therapy failure is rarely due to a single factor. Instead, it is the result of an interaction between biological status, clinical technique, material selection, and restorative quality. Advances in bioactive materials have improved success rates, but they cannot compensate for poor diagnosis or inadequate isolation. Long-term success depends on strict adherence to evidence-based protocols.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure ... Apexogenesis is performed on immature teeth with open apices that are affected by caries, trauma, or fractures with pulp exposure. Follow-up and clinical controls are recommended.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Perform thorough pulp vitality and radiographic assessment
▪️ Always use rubber dam isolation
▪️ Select bioactive materials with proven clinical evidence
▪️ Ensure immediate and well-sealed definitive restorations
▪️ Schedule follow-up evaluations to detect early signs of failure

✍️ Conclusion
Pulp therapy fails primarily due to diagnostic errors, inadequate isolation, material misuse, and poor coronal sealing. When evidence-based principles are respected, pulp therapy remains a highly predictable and conservative treatment option. Continuous education and protocol standardization are key to improving clinical outcomes.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry, 384–392.
✔ Aguilar, P., & Linsuwanont, P. (2011). Vital pulp therapy in vital permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp: A systematic review. Journal of Endodontics, 37(5), 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.004
✔ Bogen, G., Kim, J. S., & Bakland, L. K. (2008). Direct pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: An observational study. Journal of the American Dental Association, 139(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0150
✔ Hilton, T. J. (2009). Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: A review of the literature. Operative Dentistry, 34(5), 615–625.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Complete Guide to Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth: Materials, Techniques, and Success Rates
► Pulp Capping in Dentistry: How the Dental Pulp Is Protected (Updated Clinical Guide)
► CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol

Open Apex Management in Traumatized Teeth: Latest Evidence-Based Recommendations

Dental trauma frequently affects immature permanent teeth, particularly in children and adolescents. When trauma occurs before complete root development, it often results in teeth with open apices, posing significant clinical challenges.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

Open apex management in traumatized teeth aims to control infection, preserve tooth structure, and promote continued root development or apical closure using evidence-based techniques.

Advertisement

✅ Understanding Open Apex in Traumatized Teeth
An open apex is characterized by:

▪️ Incomplete root formation
▪️ Thin dentinal walls
▪️ Wide apical foramen

Traumatic injuries such as luxation, avulsion, or complicated crown fractures may compromise pulpal vitality, interrupting root development and increasing the risk of infection and fracture.
Early and accurate diagnosis is critical to determine prognosis and select the most appropriate therapeutic approach.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

✅ Diagnostic Considerations
Key diagnostic factors include:

▪️ Type and severity of trauma
▪️ Pulp vitality status
▪️ Stage of root development
▪️ Presence of infection or apical pathology

Radiographic evaluation (periapical radiographs or CBCT when indicated) is essential to assess root length, apical diameter, and periapical status.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives ... Newer agents such as bioceramic putties continue to expand treatment possibilities. Understanding the clinical performance and limitations of each material is essential for evidence-based decision-making in pulpotomies.

✅ Evidence-Based Treatment Options

➤ Apexification
Apexification is indicated for non-vital immature teeth and aims to create an apical barrier to allow obturation.
Calcium hydroxide (traditional method)
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or bioceramic materials (modern approach)
Bioceramic apexification has largely replaced long-term calcium hydroxide due to improved outcomes and reduced treatment time.

➤ Regenerative Endodontic Procedures (REPs)
Regenerative endodontics is currently the preferred approach for many immature teeth with necrotic pulps. Benefits include:
▪️ Continued root maturation
▪️ Increased dentinal wall thickness
▪️ Improved fracture resistance
This approach is supported by AAPD and IADT guidelines, particularly in young patients.

➤ Vital Pulp Therapy in Traumatized Teeth
In cases of reversible pulp damage, procedures such as:
▪️ Partial pulpotomy (Cvek pulpotomy)
▪️ Direct pulp capping
may allow continued root development (apexogenesis) when performed promptly.

📊 Comparative Table: Evidence-Based Management Options for Open Apex Teeth

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Calcium Hydroxide Apexification	Long history of use, induces apical hard tissue barrier	Long treatment time, increased fracture risk, multiple visits
MTA / Bioceramic Apexification	Shorter treatment time, predictable apical seal, biocompatible	No continued root development, higher material cost
Regenerative Endodontic Procedures	Promotes root maturation and dentinal thickening	Technique-sensitive, variable outcomes
Vital Pulp Therapy	Preserves pulp vitality and allows apexogenesis	Limited to cases with minimal pulpal inflammation

💬 Discussion
Recent evidence supports a paradigm shift toward biologically based therapies, particularly regenerative endodontics, for immature teeth with necrotic pulps. While apexification remains a valid option, it does not promote continued root development, which is critical for long-term tooth survival.
Case selection, patient compliance, and clinician expertise remain decisive factors in treatment success.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence ... This article discusses the biological properties, clinical advantages, and mechanisms of action of this paste, comparing it with other obturation materials currently used in pediatric dentistry.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Prioritize pulp vitality preservation whenever possible
▪️ Consider regenerative endodontic procedures as first-line therapy for necrotic immature teeth
▪️ Use bioceramic materials for apexification when regeneration is not feasible
▪️ Ensure long-term follow-up to monitor root development and periapical healing
▪️ Follow IADT and AAPD trauma guidelines strictly

✍️ Conclusion
Management of traumatized teeth with open apices requires an evidence-based, individualized approach. Advances in regenerative endodontics and bioceramic materials have significantly improved clinical outcomes. Early intervention, accurate diagnosis, and adherence to current guidelines are essential to ensure functional and long-lasting results.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry.
✔ Diogenes, A., Henry, M. A., Teixeira, F. B., & Hargreaves, K. M. (2013). An update on clinical regenerative endodontics. Endodontic Topics, 28(1), 2–23.
✔ Fouad, A. F., Abbott, P. V., Tsilingaridis, G., et al. (2020). International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. Dental Traumatology, 36(4), 314–330.
✔ Torabinejad, M., & Parirokh, M. (2010). Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Endodontics, 36(1), 16–27.
✔ American Association of Endodontists. (2021). Clinical considerations for regenerative procedures.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children
► Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence
► Partial Pulpotomy in Pediatric Dentistry: Technique, Benefits, and Key Differences

Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives

For decades, formocresol was considered the gold standard for pulpotomy in primary teeth. Its fixative and antimicrobial properties led to widespread use in pediatric dentistry. However, advances in biomedical research and biocompatible materials have significantly changed clinical practice.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

Advertisement

✅ What Is Formocresol and Why Was It Used?
Formocresol is a compound containing formaldehyde, cresol, glycerin, and water. It was historically used to devitalize radicular pulp tissue in primary teeth.
Its popularity was based on:

▪️ Ease of use
▪️ Low cost
▪️ Short chair time
▪️ Acceptable short-term clinical success

However, success rates alone are no longer sufficient to justify clinical use when patient safety is compromised.

📌 Recommended Article :

Webinar 🔽 Webinar: Pulpectomy: Clinical Tips and Tricks in Paediatric Dentistry ... Pulpectomy is performed when there is an infectious process (fistula or abscess), chronic inflammation, or pulp necrosis.

✅ Evidence-Based Risks of Formocresol
Multiple studies have demonstrated that formaldehyde can diffuse systemically after pulpotomy procedures. Scientific evidence associates formocresol with:

▪️ Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects
▪️ Immune sensitization
▪️ Potential carcinogenicity
▪️ Adverse effects on developing tissues

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies formaldehyde as a Group 1 carcinogen, raising major concerns for pediatric patients.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

✅ Current Guidelines and Professional Consensus
Leading organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) now recommend biocompatible alternatives over formocresol.
Modern pulp therapy focuses on:

▪️ Preservation of radicular pulp vitality
▪️ Promotion of healing and regeneration
▪️ Use of bioactive and calcium silicate–based materials

📌 Recommended Article :

Video 🔽 Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure ... Apexogenesis is performed on immature teeth with open apices that are affected by caries, trauma, or fractures with pulp exposure. Follow-up and clinical controls are recommended.

✅ Modern Alternatives to Formocresol
Several materials have demonstrated equal or superior success rates with improved safety profiles:

▪️ Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)
▪️ Biodentine
▪️ Calcium hydroxide
▪️ Ferric sulfate

Among these, MTA and Biodentine show the highest long-term clinical and radiographic success.

📊 Comparative Table: Pulpotomy Materials in Pediatric Dentistry

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Formocresol	Simple technique; historical clinical familiarity	Toxicity; carcinogenic potential; not biocompatible
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)	High success rates; promotes hard tissue formation	Higher cost; longer setting time
Biodentine	Excellent biocompatibility; fast setting	Cost; technique sensitivity
Ferric Sulfate	Hemostatic effect; acceptable clinical outcomes	Does not promote dentin bridge formation
Calcium Hydroxide	Biological compatibility; low cost	Lower long-term success in primary teeth

💬 Discussion
While formocresol played an important historical role, its continued use is inconsistent with modern principles of pediatric dental care. Dentistry has shifted from devitalization toward biological pulp preservation.
The availability of bioactive materials that promote dentin bridge formation and pulp healing eliminates the need for potentially harmful medicaments.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... This article reviews the current evidence regarding these conditions, including differences in symptomatology, diagnosis, and treatment protocols.

✍️ Conclusion
Formocresol is no longer recommended in pediatric pulp therapy due to well-documented systemic and biological risks. Evidence-based dentistry now prioritizes biocompatibility, safety, and long-term outcomes, making modern alternatives the standard of care.

🔎 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Avoid the use of formocresol in primary teeth
▪️ Prefer MTA or Biodentine for pulpotomy procedures
▪️ Follow AAPD evidence-based guidelines
▪️ Emphasize pulp vitality preservation
▪️ Educate caregivers about safer treatment options

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry, 384–392. https://www.aapd.org/research/oral-health-policies--recommendations/pulp-therapy/
✔ International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2012). Formaldehyde. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 100F.
✔ Ranly, D. M. (2000). Pulpotomy therapy in primary teeth: New modalities for old rationales. Pediatric Dentistry, 22(5), 403–409.
✔ Fuks, A. B. (2008). Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth: New directions and treatment perspectives. Pediatric Dentistry, 30(3), 211–219.
✔ Agamy, H. A., Bakry, N. S., Mounir, M. M., & Avery, D. R. (2004). Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 26(4), 302–309.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence
► Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025
► Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations

Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence

Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

Its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity has made it a key intracanal medicament in regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) and complex pulpal infections.

Advertisement

Despite its effectiveness, concerns regarding tooth discoloration, cytotoxicity, and antibiotic resistance have prompted ongoing research and clinical debate.

✅ What Is Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP)?
TAP is a combination of three antibiotics:

▪️ Metronidazole
▪️ Ciprofloxacin
▪️ Minocycline
This formulation targets both aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, making it particularly effective against polymicrobial endodontic infections.
TAP is primarily used as an intracanal medicament rather than a permanent filling material.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

✅ Clinical Applications in Pediatric Endodontics
TAP is commonly indicated in:

▪️ Necrotic primary teeth with periapical pathology
▪️ Immature permanent teeth with open apices
▪️ Regenerative endodontic procedures
▪️ Persistent endodontic infections resistant to conventional irrigation

Clinical studies show a significant reduction in bacterial load when TAP is used short-term.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth is a cornerstone of pediatric dental treatment. Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

✅ Advantages of TAP

▪️ Broad-spectrum antimicrobial efficacy
▪️ Effective against Enterococcus faecalis and anaerobic species
▪️ Enhances canal disinfection prior to regenerative procedures
▪️ Improves clinical and radiographic healing outcomes

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence ... This article discusses the biological properties, clinical advantages, and mechanisms of action of this paste, comparing it with other obturation materials currently used in pediatric dentistry.

✅ Limitations and Safety Concerns
Despite its benefits, TAP presents important limitations:

▪️ Minocycline-induced tooth discoloration
▪️ Potential cytotoxic effects on stem cells
▪️ Risk of antibiotic resistance
▪️ Not recommended for long-term intracanal use

These concerns have led to the development of modified formulations such as Double Antibiotic Paste (DAP) and antibiotic-free alternatives.

📊 Comparative Table: Benefits of Pastes Used in Pulp Therapy

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP)	Broad-spectrum antimicrobial action; effective in regenerative procedures	Tooth discoloration; cytotoxicity; antibiotic resistance risk
Double Antibiotic Paste (DAP)	Reduced discoloration risk; effective bacterial control	Still involves antibiotic exposure; limited long-term data
Calcium Hydroxide	High biocompatibility; promotes hard tissue formation	Less effective against resistant bacteria
Ledermix Paste	Anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties	Contains corticosteroids; limited pediatric indication
Iodoform-Based Pastes	Resorbable; suitable for primary teeth	Limited antimicrobial spectrum

💬 Discussion
Current evidence supports the short-term use of TAP as an effective intracanal medicament, particularly in regenerative endodontics. However, lower concentrations and limited exposure times are strongly recommended to reduce adverse effects.
Recent guidelines emphasize balancing antimicrobial efficacy with biocompatibility, especially in pediatric patients where tissue healing and tooth development are critical.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... In pediatric dentistry, calcium hydroxide is used primarily for vital pulp therapy procedures such as direct pulp capping, pulpotomy, and apexogenesis.

✍️ Conclusion
Triple Antibiotic Paste remains a valuable tool in pediatric endodontics when used judiciously. While highly effective in infection control, clinicians must consider its limitations and adhere to evidence-based protocols to ensure safety and long-term success.

🔎 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use TAP at low concentrations (≤1 mg/mL)
▪️ Limit intracanal placement to 1–4 weeks
▪️ Avoid use in esthetic zones when possible
▪️ Consider DAP or calcium hydroxide as alternatives
▪️ Follow updated regenerative endodontic guidelines

📚 References

✔ Hoshino, E., Kurihara-Ando, N., Sato, I., Uematsu, H., Sato, M., Kota, K., & Iwaku, M. (1996). In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. International Endodontic Journal, 29(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01173.x
✔ American Association of Endodontists. (2023). Clinical considerations for regenerative endodontic procedures. https://www.aae.org/specialty/clinical-resources/regenerative-endodontics/
✔ Diogenes, A., Ruparel, N. B., Shiloah, Y., & Hargreaves, K. M. (2016). Regenerative endodontics: A way forward. Journal of the American Dental Association, 147(5), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.01.018
✔ Ruparel, N. B., Teixeira, F. B., Ferraz, C. C., & Diogenes, A. (2012). Direct effect of intracanal medicaments on survival of stem cells of the apical papilla. Journal of Endodontics, 38(10), 1372–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.018

📌 More Recommended Items

► Best Materials for Pulpotomy in Primary Teeth: MTA vs. Biodentine vs. Ferric Sulfate
► Pulp Capping in Dentistry: How the Dental Pulp Is Protected (Updated Clinical Guide)
► Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives