Anterior open bite (AOB) is a challenging orthodontic malocclusion because successful correction depends on controlling the vertical position and inclination of both anterior and posterior teeth, while addressing the underlying skeletal, dental, and functional factors.
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Orthodontic Archwire Selection Guide: Types and Functions ... Different archwires have different properties. Some are flexible and ideal for the beginning of treatment, while others are stronger and provide precise tooth control during the final stages.In patients treated with fixed appliances, archwire selection alone does not determine treatment success. The wire sequence must be integrated with appropriate vertical mechanics, anchorage control, and, when indicated, auxiliary appliances.
Advertisement
Current evidence supports individualized treatment based on the etiology and severity of the open bite. In particular, posterior intrusion with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) can provide meaningful vertical control, whereas MEAW mechanics and vertical elastics can be useful when dentoalveolar compensation is appropriate.
🔹 What Is the Best Archwire Sequence for Open Bite Treatment?
There is no single archwire sequence supported as superior for every open-bite patient. A practical sequence for patients treated with conventional fixed appliances is:
| Treatment Phase | Typical Archwire | Primary Objective |
|---|---|---|
| Initial alignment | 0.012–0.014 NiTi | Gentle alignment and leveling |
| Continued alignment | 0.016–0.018 NiTi | Progression of alignment while maintaining flexibility |
| Early working phase | 0.016 × 0.022 or 0.017 × 0.025 NiTi | Begin three-dimensional control |
| Vertical-control phase | 0.017 × 0.025 or 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel/TMA | Rigidity, torque expression, and auxiliary mechanics |
| Finishing | 0.017 × 0.025 or 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel | Root positioning and occlusal detailing |
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Best Archwire Sequence for Deep Bite Correction ... The appropriate biomechanics depend on the etiology of the deep bite, facial pattern, incisor display, periodontal condition, and desired vertical tooth movement.1. Initial Alignment: Round NiTi
Treatment generally begins with a light round nickel-titanium (NiTi) archwire.
Typical progression may include:
0.012 NiTi → 0.014 NiTi → 0.016 NiTi → 0.018 NiTi
The purpose is primarily alignment and leveling rather than active open-bite closure.
In an open-bite patient, excessive early leveling should be avoided when it produces undesirable posterior extrusion or uncontrolled vertical changes. The clinician should evaluate the vertical position of the molars and incisors before progressing to larger wires.
2. Transition to Rectangular NiTi
Once sufficient alignment has been achieved, a rectangular NiTi archwire can provide improved three-dimensional control.
Examples include:
0.016 × 0.022 NiTi → 0.017 × 0.025 NiTi
or, depending on the bracket system:
0.018 × 0.025 NiTi
This phase allows progressive expression of torque and tip control while maintaining some flexibility.
The rectangular wire should not be considered the principal mechanism for closing the open bite. Its role is to establish adequate tooth control before more rigid vertical mechanics are introduced.
3. Working Archwire: Stainless Steel or TMA
When alignment and leveling are substantially complete, a more rigid rectangular archwire is generally preferable for controlled vertical mechanics.
Common options include:
▪️ 0.017 × 0.025 stainless steel
▪️ 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel
▪️ 0.017 × 0.025 TMA when greater flexibility is desirable
A rigid working archwire is particularly useful when applying vertical elastics, extrusion mechanics, TAD-supported mechanics, or MEAW-type adjustments.
The choice between 0.017 × 0.025 and 0.019 × 0.025 should not be predetermined. A larger wire may improve control but can also increase force levels and reduce flexibility. Periodontal support and tooth mobility must therefore be considered.
4. Vertical Elastics: An Important Auxiliary
Anterior vertical elastics are frequently used after adequate arch coordination has been established.
They can be attached between:
▪️ maxillary and mandibular incisors,
▪️ canine-to-canine regions, or
▪️ selected anterior segments according to the required force system.
Their principal effect is dentoalveolar extrusion of the anterior teeth, so they are most appropriate when anterior extrusion is compatible with the patient's smile esthetics, incisor display, and skeletal pattern.
Clinical studies have demonstrated successful open-bite correction using vertical elastics combined with posterior vertical control and MEAW mechanics.
5. TADs for Posterior Vertical Control
For patients in whom excessive posterior dentoalveolar height contributes significantly to the open bite, temporary anchorage devices (TADs) may provide a more appropriate biomechanical strategy than relying primarily on anterior extrusion.
TAD-supported posterior intrusion can produce:
▪️ molar intrusion
▪️ counterclockwise mandibular autorotation in appropriate patients
▪️ reduction of anterior facial height in selected cases
▪️ improvement of anterior overbite
A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis reported a pooled mean molar intrusion of approximately 1.70 mm with TAD-supported treatment, although substantial heterogeneity existed among studies.
Another systematic review reported approximately 2.89 mm of maxillary molar intrusion with skeletal anchorage, with greater effects reported for miniplates than miniscrews.
Therefore, TADs should be considered particularly when the treatment objective is posterior intrusion rather than simply anterior extrusion.
🔹 Additional Appliances Used With Fixed Brackets
Open-bite treatment frequently requires auxiliary appliances in addition to the archwire.
| Auxiliary | Main Indication | Principal Biomechanical Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical elastics | Mild–moderate dentoalveolar AOB | Anterior extrusion and settling |
| TADs / miniscrews | Skeletal or posterior vertical excess | Posterior intrusion and anchorage |
| Palatal crib | Persistent tongue-thrusting or habit-related AOB | Habit modification and tongue control |
| Bonded lingual spurs | Selected patients with abnormal tongue posture or habits | Restriction of anterior tongue pressure |
| MEAW | More complex dentoalveolar or skeletal open bite | Posterior uprighting, occlusal-plane control, and anterior extrusion |
| Posterior bite blocks | Selected growing patients | Vertical control and posterior eruption modification |
| High-pull headgear / chin cup | Selected growing patients | Additional orthopedic and vertical control |
📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Orthodontic Archwire Sequence: Complete Clinical Guide ... This guide explains the most commonly used orthodontic archwire sequence, the purpose of each treatment phase, and practical recommendations to help patients and dental professionals better understand the treatment process.🔹 MEAW Mechanics: When Should They Be Considered?
The Multiloop Edgewise Archwire (MEAW) technique remains an option for selected open-bite patients, particularly when detailed control of posterior tooth inclination and the occlusal plane is required.
A typical MEAW approach uses a rectangular stainless-steel wire with multiple loops and is frequently combined with vertical elastics.
Clinical studies have reported approximately 4 mm of overbite improvement following MEAW therapy, with favorable stability reported in selected patients. However, much of the literature consists of observational studies and treatment reports rather than high-level comparative trials.
Consequently, MEAW should be regarded as a specific biomechanical technique, not as a universally superior archwire sequence.
🔹 Archwire Sequence According to Treatment Objective
The most appropriate sequence depends more on the vertical problem being treated than on wire size alone.
| Clinical Situation | Preferred Strategy |
|---|---|
| Mild dental open bite | Alignment → rectangular working wire → vertical elastics |
| Open bite associated with tongue habit | Fixed appliances + habit control/crib or spurs + vertical mechanics |
| Increased posterior dentoalveolar height | Rigid rectangular wire + TAD-supported molar intrusion |
| Significant skeletal open bite in a nonsurgical patient | Rigid rectangular mechanics ± MEAW + TADs/elastics |
| Severe skeletal discrepancy | Orthodontic camouflage or orthognathic surgery, depending on diagnosis |
| Finishing after bite closure | Rigid rectangular stainless steel + controlled settling |
The principal limitation of describing a single “best archwire sequence” is that open bite is not a uniform biomechanical problem. A patient with predominantly anterior dentoalveolar deficiency requires a different force system from a patient with excessive posterior dentoalveolar height or a pronounced skeletal vertical pattern.
The current evidence increasingly favors vertical control rather than indiscriminate anterior extrusion when posterior vertical excess is present. TAD-supported molar intrusion has demonstrated clinically relevant improvements in overbite, although treatment outcomes vary substantially between studies.
MEAW mechanics can also produce substantial open-bite correction, but the evidence base is less robust and should not be interpreted as proof that MEAW is superior to conventional rectangular archwires combined with appropriate auxiliaries.
Long-term stability remains an important consideration. A systematic review of TAD-supported molar intrusion found approximately 1.23 mm of standardized overbite relapse, with reported molar relapse of approximately 12% for maxillary molars and 27.2% for mandibular molars. The certainty of evidence was low to very low.
Therefore, etiologic diagnosis, vertical anchorage, controlled tooth movement, and retention are more important than selecting a particular wire sequence in isolation.
🎯 Clinical Recommendations
1. Do not use a fixed archwire sequence for every open-bite patient. Adapt wire progression to the vertical diagnosis and periodontal condition.
2. Use round NiTi primarily for alignment, progressing to rectangular NiTi once adequate alignment permits three-dimensional control.
3. Introduce rigid rectangular mechanics before demanding vertical movements with elastics, TADs, or MEAW.
4. When posterior vertical excess is a major component, prioritize posterior intrusion rather than relying exclusively on anterior extrusion.
5. Use TADs when reliable posterior anchorage and intrusion are required, particularly in nongrowing patients with skeletal or dentoalveolar vertical excess.
6. Reserve MEAW mechanics for cases in which its specific control of posterior inclination and the occlusal plane provides a biomechanical advantage.
7. Plan retention from the beginning. Open-bite correction has a recognized relapse tendency, particularly when the original functional or skeletal factors remain unresolved.
✍️ Conclusion
The best archwire sequence for open bite treatment is not a single standardized progression of wire sizes. A practical approach is to begin with light round NiTi for alignment, transition to rectangular NiTi for three-dimensional control, and use a rigid rectangular stainless-steel or TMA working wire for vertical mechanics and finishing.
However, the decisive factor is the force system applied to the malocclusion. Vertical elastics may be sufficient in mild dentoalveolar cases, whereas TAD-supported posterior intrusion or MEAW mechanics may be more appropriate when greater vertical control is required. The final treatment strategy should therefore be based on the patient's skeletal pattern, posterior vertical dimension, incisor display, functional factors, growth status, and periodontal support rather than on archwire size alone.
📚 References
✔ Alsafadi, A. S., Alabdullah, M. M., Saltaji, H., Abdo, A., & Youssef, M. (2016). Effect of molar intrusion with temporary anchorage devices in patients with anterior open bite: A systematic review. Progress in Orthodontics, 17, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0122-4
✔ Burgos-Lancero, P., Ibor-Miguel, M., Marqués-Martínez, L., Boo-Gordillo, P., García-Miralles, E., & Guinot-Barona, C. (2025). Correction of anterior open bite using temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(14), 4958. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144958
✔ Kim, Y. H., Han, U. K., Lim, D. D., & Serraon, M. L. (2000). Stability of anterior openbite correction with multiloop edgewise archwire therapy: A cephalometric follow-up study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 118(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.104830
✔ Omidkhoda, M., Bardideh, E., Jahanbin, A., & Zarei, M. (2023). Effects of posterior intrusion using skeletal anchorage on treating anterior open bite: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects, 17, 196–210. https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.40754
✔ Papageorgiou, S. N., Konstantinidis, I., Papadopoulou, K., Jäger, A., & Bourauel, C. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental clinical evidence on initial aligning archwires and archwire sequences. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, 17(4), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12048
✔ Peterkin, C., Abu Arqub, S., Murphy, N., Karanth, D., & Dolce, C. (2024). A retrospective comparative cephalometric evaluation of non-extraction multiloop edgewise archwire and bicuspid extraction therapies in anterior open bite treatment. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28, 569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05966-y
📌 More Recommended Items
► Roth vs MBT Brackets: Key Differences Explained
► 4x2 Technique vs 2x4 Technique: Are They the Same?
► Orthodontic Retainers: How Long Should They Be Worn?