Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta OdontoVida. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta OdontoVida. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 1 de diciembre de 2025

CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol

CTZ Paste

The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.
This article presents an updated, evidence-based analysis of its indications, clinical technique, advantages, limitations, and safety considerations.

Advertisement

Introduction
The CTZ technique, also known as Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR), aims to disinfect infected primary teeth by using a topical antibiotic mixture sealed within the pulp chamber. Unlike full pulpectomy, this approach promotes infection control without extensive instrumentation, making it useful in pediatric patients with limited cooperation.
However, concerns regarding antibiotic resistance, systemic absorption, and use of chloramphenicol and tetracycline in children have prompted ongoing debate. Updated guidelines emphasize strict case selection and avoidance of CTZ when safer alternatives (e.g., Vitapex, Ca(OH)₂–iodoform pastes) are available.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.
Composition of CTZ Paste
CTZ paste typically contains:

▪️ Chloramphenicol (250 mg)
▪️ Tetracycline (250 mg)
▪️ Zinc oxide
▪️ Eugenol or propylene glycol as vehicle

Some variations replace tetracycline with metronidazole or eliminate eugenol.

Mechanism of Action

▪️ Broad-spectrum antibacterial effect against anaerobic and facultative bacteria involved in primary tooth infections.
▪️ Promotes partial tissue repair through reduction of bacterial load.
▪️ Works without canal instrumentation, relying on diffusion through dentinal tubules.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry ... This article explores their mechanisms, techniques, clinical protocols, and compares them to traditional materials such as formocresol and zinc oxide-eugenol.
Clinical Indications
CTZ paste is indicated when:

▪️ The child cannot tolerate conventional pulpectomy.
▪️ Canals are severely obstructed, resorbed, or inaccessible.
▪️ There is chronic infection, fistula, or abscess associated with a restorable tooth.
▪️ Treatment aims to maintain the primary tooth short-term until natural exfoliation or eruption of the successor.

Contraindications

▪️ Children with allergy to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, or eugenol.
▪️ When the tooth is non-restorable.
▪️ Presence of advanced pathological resorption or mobile tooth near exfoliation.
▪️ Patients with systemic conditions requiring antibiotic stewardship.
▪️ When the tooth can receive conventional pulpectomy.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... Pulpal diseases represent a continuum of inflammatory conditions that range from reversible pulpitis to irreversible pulpitis and finally to pulp necrosis.
Clinical Procedure

1. Local anesthesia and isolation.
2. Removal of coronal pulp and carious tissue.
3. Irrigation with saline or chlorhexidine (no instrumentation of canals).
4. Placement of a thin layer of CTZ paste on chamber floor.
5. Seal with reinforced glass ionomer cement.
6. Final restoration with stainless steel crown, whenever possible.

Benefits

▪️ Requires minimal cooperation, ideal for uncooperative children.
▪️ Effective in reducing clinical signs of infection.
▪️ Faster than pulpectomy.
▪️ Useful in public health settings or emergency care.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Among them, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has emerged as a gold standard for pulp therapy, especially for its regenerative properties and sealing capability.
Limitations and Safety Concerns

▪️ Potential risk of antibiotic resistance.
▪️ Chloramphenicol carries risk of systemic absorption (rare but serious).
▪️ Tetracycline may cause tooth discoloration when absorbed systemically.
▪️ Lower long-term success compared with proper pulpectomy techniques.

📊 Comparative Table: CTZ Paste vs Conventional Pulpectomy

Aspect Advantages Limitations
CTZ Paste Minimal instrumentation; fast; good for uncooperative children Antibiotic exposure; lower long-term success; limited indications
Conventional Pulpectomy Biocompatible materials; higher long-term success; well-documented evidence Longer procedure; requires cooperation; technically demanding

💬 Discussion
Although CTZ paste can be effective in selected cases, its use must be ethical and evidence-based. Current pediatric dentistry guidelines favor biocompatible materials (e.g., MTA, Biodentine, Vitapex, Ca(OH)₂) due to better long-term outcomes and absence of systemic antibiotic risks.
Nevertheless, CTZ paste remains a valuable alternative in:

▪️ Remote or resource-limited environments
▪️ Patients with behavioral management challenges
▪️ Complex anatomy preventing conventional therapy

The decision should always consider risk–benefit, parental counseling, and tooth prognosis.

📌 Recommended Article :
PDF 🔽 Manual of diagnosis and pulp treatment in non-vital primary teeth ... Non-vital teeth are those whose nerves lack vitality and there is no blood flow inside. This may be due to deep caries or dental trauma that irreversibly affects the dental pulp.
✍️ Conclusion
CTZ paste is an alternative pulp therapy for infected primary teeth when conventional treatment is not feasible. Its effectiveness relies on infection control, but concerns about antibiotic exposure and resistance require strict clinical judgment. When used appropriately, CTZ can help maintain primary teeth temporarily, supporting occlusal development until natural exfoliation.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Prefer standard pulpectomy when feasible.
▪️ Reserve CTZ for special circumstances and always inform parents about risks.
▪️ Follow-up radiographs every 3–6 months.
▪️ Always restore with full-coverage restoration.
▪️ Consider newer biocompatible pastes as first choice.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. AAPD Clinical Guidelines.
✔ Bimstein, E., & Rotstein, I. (2019). Root canal treatment for children and adolescents. Springer Nature.
✔ Nakornchai, S., Banditsing, P., & Visetratana, N. (2020). Clinical evaluation of LSTR/CTZ therapy in primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 30(4), 500–507.
✔ Primosch, R., & Glomb, T. (2018). Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth: Current concepts. Pediatric Dentistry, 40(5), 315–322.

📌 More Recommended Items

Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives
Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence
Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons

domingo, 30 de noviembre de 2025

Mouth Breathing in Children and Adults: Why It Is Harmful and How to Manage It

Tooth Extraction

Mouth breathing is a chronic dysfunctional breathing pattern linked to anatomical obstruction, habits, and sleep-related disorders.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Oral breathing: new early treatment protocol ... Mouth breathing is multifactorial, and its consequences are short and long term, and it is evident in the oral cavity and in general health. Early evaluation and treatment by the pediatric dentistry and pediatrician is necessary.
Its long-term consequences affect craniofacial development, oral health, systemic physiology, and quality of life. Early diagnosis and intervention are essential to prevent irreversible changes, particularly in children.

Advertisement

Introduction
Mouth breathing refers to the predominant use of the oral cavity instead of the nose for airflow at rest. While occasional mouth breathing during a cold or intense exercise is normal, persistent oral respiration is clinically significant. Research shows that chronic mouth breathing disrupts nasal filtration, alters muscle activity, modifies dental arch development, and contributes to both malocclusions and sleep-disordered breathing (Zaghi et al., 2022). Early identification is crucial because craniofacial structures in children are still developing and more susceptible to functional changes.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 How to Correct Harmful Oral Habits in Children That Affect Facial and Dental Development ... Early childhood is a critical period for craniofacial and dental development. Certain harmful oral habits, such as thumb sucking, mouth breathing, or nail biting, can interfere with proper facial growth and tooth alignment.
Causes of Mouth Breathing

➤ Anatomical Causes
▪️ Adenoid or tonsillar hypertrophy
▪️ Deviated nasal septum
▪️ Chronic allergic rhinitis
▪️ Nasal polyps
▪️ Inferior turbinate hypertrophy

➤ Functional and Behavioral Causes
▪️ Habitual open-mouth posture
▪️ Thumb sucking or prolonged pacifier use
▪️ Incorrect resting tongue position
▪️ Orofacial muscle hypotonia

➤ Sleep-Related Causes
▪️ Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)
▪️ Primary snoring
▪️ Sleep-disordered breathing secondary to obesity

📌 Recommended Article :
PDF 🔽 Clinical Case: Pseudo class III treatment in 2-year-old children ... Untreated pseudo class III may lead to serious problems. The case report describes pseudo class III in primary dentition successfully treated by using Protrusive Arch Wire.
Clinical Consequences in Children

➤ Craniofacial Growth Alterations
Chronic mouth breathing can redirect mandibular and maxillary growth patterns, producing the classic long-face syndrome (adenoid facies). Associated findings include:
▪️ Narrow maxilla
▪️ High palatal vault
▪️ Increased lower facial height
▪️ Posterior crossbite
▪️ Class II malocclusion tendencies

➤ Oral Health Impacts
▪️ Increased risk of dental caries due to reduced salivary flow
▪️ Gingival inflammation
▪️ Halitosis
▪️ Lip incompetence and dry mucosa

➤ Systemic and Behavioral Consequences
▪️ Daytime fatigue
▪️ Learning difficulties
▪️ Reduced concentration
▪️ Behavioral issues resembling ADHD
▪️ Poor sleep quality

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Is Your Child A Mouth Breather? ... Mouth breathing, defined as habitual or chronic inhalation through the mouth rather than the nose, predominantly arises from nasal obstruction but may also become a learned habit.
Clinical Consequences in Adults

➤ Oral and Periodontal Effects
Persistent oral breathing in adults often leads to:
▪️ Chronic xerostomia
▪️ Gingivitis and periodontitis progression
▪️ Higher susceptibility to root caries

➤ Respiratory and Sleep Effects
▪️ Snoring
▪️ Sleep-disordered breathing
▪️ Reduced oxygen saturation during sleep
▪️ Morning headaches

➤ Musculoskeletal and Postural Changes
▪️ Forward head posture
▪️ Neck and shoulder tension
▪️ Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) discomfort

📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Early Orthodontic Treatment: The Essential Knowledge for a General Dental Practitioner ... The general dentist must know what are the characteristics of occlusion in infants, to identify the habits or factors that can generate a pathology.
Diagnosis

➤ Clinical Evaluation
A comprehensive assessment includes:
▪️ Nasal patency examination
▪️ Lip competence observation
▪️ Tongue posture evaluation
▪️ Adenoid/tonsillar inspection
▪️ Cervicofacial posture assessment

➤ Complementary Exams
▪️ Lateral cephalometric radiograph
▪️ Nasal endoscopy (ENT evaluation)
▪️ Sleep study if OSA is suspected

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Nolla Stages: Clinical Guide and Comparative Table ... The Nolla method (1960) established 11 stages of dental maturation, from the absence of calcification to the complete eruption of the tooth in the arch.
Evidence-Based Treatment

➤ Treatment in Children
Management depends on etiology and severity:
▪️ Adenotonsillectomy for obstructive hypertrophy
▪️ Allergy control (intranasal corticosteroids or antihistamines under medical guidance)
▪️ Maxillary expansion (RPE, SME) to widen nasal cavity and improve airflow
▪️ Myofunctional therapy to correct oral posture
▪️ Discontinuation of harmful habits

➤ Treatment in Adults
▪️ Nasal obstruction management (surgical or medical depending on case)
▪️ CPAP if associated with OSA
▪️ Orthodontic or orthognathic treatment when skeletal discrepancies persist
▪️ Orofacial myofunctional training

📊 Comparative Table: Nasal Breathing vs. Mouth Breathing

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Nasal Breathing Filters, warms and humidifies air; supports optimal craniofacial growth Limited during obstruction or anatomical deviations
Mouth Breathing Allows airflow when nasal passages are blocked Leads to malocclusions, dry mouth, poor sleep and systemic effects

💬 Discussion
Chronic mouth breathing is not a simple habit; it is a multifactorial condition with structural, functional, and behavioral consequences. Evidence shows that early intervention produces better outcomes, especially in the pediatric population where craniofacial growth can still be redirected. Adults, on the other hand, often require combined therapies rather than single-modality treatment. A multidisciplinary approach—pediatric dentistry, ENT, orthodontics, speech therapy, sleep medicine—is essential for long-term success.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Maxillary Orthopedics vs. Interceptive Orthodontics: Understanding Their Clinical Differences ... This article explores their definitions, characteristics, objectives, and the most common appliances used in each approach.
✍️ Conclusion
Mouth breathing substantially affects oral health, craniofacial development, systemic physiology, and sleep quality. Early diagnosis and targeted intervention are essential to prevent irreversible complications. Both adults and children benefit from an individualized management plan addressing nasal obstruction, soft-tissue dysfunction, and skeletal discrepancies.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Evaluate nasal patency and adenoid/tonsil size in all mouth-breathing children.
▪️ Implement orthodontic expansion when indicated.
▪️ Consider ENT referral early when obstruction is suspected.
▪️ Educate parents about the impact of oral habits on breathing.
▪️ Incorporate myofunctional therapy as part of long-term rehabilitation.
▪️ For adults, screen for sleep-disordered breathing before starting treatment.

📚 References

✔ Villa, M. P., Evangelisti, M., Barreto, M., Cecili, M., & Kaditis, A. G. (2017). Nasal obstruction in children: A clinical review. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 99, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.05.029
✔ Zaghi, S., Patel, P., Barber, R., & Guilleminault, C. (2022). Sleep disordered breathing, mouth breathing, and craniofacial development: The role of myofunctional therapy. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 61, 101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101572
✔ Camacho, M., Certal, V., Abdullatif, J., et al. (2015). Myofunctional therapy to treat obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep, 38(5), 669–675. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.4652

📌 More Recommended Items

Clinical recognition of mouth breathing children
Early Diagnosis and Management of Impacted Canines: A Clinical Guide for Pediatric and Orthodontic Practitioners
Pacifier Use in Infants: Dental Risks and Recommendations

sábado, 29 de noviembre de 2025

When Should an Infected Tooth Be Extracted? Updated Criteria for Primary and Permanent Dentition

Tooth Extraction

The decision to extract an infected tooth requires a careful assessment of the severity of the infection, the prognosis of the tooth, and the systemic risks for the patient.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Analgesic and Antibiotic Recommendations in Pediatric Oral Surgery ... Selecting appropriate analgesic and antibiotic therapy is essential to ensure safety, comfort, and recovery while minimizing adverse reactions and resistance.
In both primary and permanent dentition, timely diagnosis prevents the progression of infection, reduces pain, and avoids complications such as cellulitis, osteomyelitis, or damage to successor teeth.

Advertisement

Understanding Dental Infections in Children and Adults
Dental infections originate from bacterial invasion into the pulp chamber, leading to pulpitis, necrosis, and eventually periapical pathology. Treatment options vary depending on whether the tooth can be restored, the extent of bone destruction, and the patient’s age.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Key Differences Between Pediatric and Adult Odontogenic Infections: Updated Clinical Guidelines ... This article outlines the major anatomical, clinical, and therapeutic distinctions between pediatric and adult odontogenic infections, highlighting the need for age-specific diagnosis and treatment approaches.
Signs and Symptoms That Indicate a Tooth May Need Extraction

➤ Primary Teeth
▪️ Persistent dental abscess or fistula despite prior treatment
▪️ Severe root resorption affecting tooth stability
▪️ Pathological mobility not due to normal exfoliation
▪️ Presence of a cystic lesion associated with the primary tooth
▪️ Infection compromising the permanent successor, causing hypoplasia or displacement
▪️ Extensive crown destruction preventing pulpotomy or pulpectomy
▪️ Non-restorable tooth due to decay or trauma

➤ Permanent Teeth
▪️ Irreversible pulpitis with poor restorative prognosis
▪️ Vertical root fracture confirmed clinically or radiographically
▪️ Advanced periodontal disease with mobility grade III
▪️ Non-restorable decay extending subgingivally
▪️ Recurrent infection after endodontic treatment with no predictable retreatment success
▪️ Extensive bone loss around the tooth due to chronic infection
▪️ Systemic involvement: fever, swelling, or cellulitis spreading to fascial spaces

📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Tooth Extraction Aftercare Tips ... Before extracting a tooth, the dental surgeon must instruct the patient on pre and post operative care. These recommendations are intended to protect the wound and the healing process.
Evidence-Based Treatment Options Before Considering Extraction

➤ Primary Dentition
▪️ Pulpotomy (for reversible pulp inflammation)
▪️ Pulpectomy (in select cases where canals are accessible and root structure remains)
▪️ Antibiotics only when systemic involvement is present; antibiotics do not replace definitive treatment

➤ Permanent Dentition
▪️ Root canal therapy
▪️ Periodontal therapy in cases of combined endo-perio lesions
▪️ Endodontic retreatment or apical surgery when feasible
If the prognosis remains unfavorable, extraction becomes the safest option.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Serial Extractions in Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical Phases, Benefits, and Updated Guidelines ... This article provides an evidence-based review of the clinical phases of serial extractions, their benefits, indications, and current recommendations.
Indications for Immediate Extraction

▪️ Rapidly spreading infection, facial swelling, difficulty swallowing, or systemic signs
▪️ Non-restorable tooth structure
▪️ Extensive periapical destruction
▪️ Tooth acting as a reservoir of infection in medically compromised patients
▪️ Teeth interfering with the eruption path of permanent successors (primary teeth)

📊 Comparative Table: Extraction Criteria in Primary vs. Permanent Teeth

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Primary Teeth: Early Extraction of Infected Teeth Prevents damage to permanent successors; reduces recurrence Risk of space loss; may require a space maintainer
Permanent Teeth: Conservative Treatment First Preserves natural dentition; avoids prosthetic replacement Not viable if tooth is non-restorable or infection persists

💬 Discussion
Determining when to extract an infected tooth requires integrating clinical findings, radiographic evidence, child development considerations, and patient history. Primary teeth demand careful evaluation due to the close relationship with permanent buds. For permanent teeth, the decision prioritizes long-term oral health, potential restoration success, and systemic risk.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 How to Prevent Dry Socket After Tooth Extraction: Signs, Prevention, and Treatment Guide ... Preventing dry socket is a key responsibility shared by both dental professionals and patients, involving proper surgical technique, patient education, and targeted pharmacological management.
✍️ Conclusion
An infected tooth requires extraction when restorative options are no longer viable, when infection threatens systemic health, or when the tooth compromises normal dental development. Evidence-based assessment ensures safe outcomes for both children and adults, reducing complications and supporting long-term oral health.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Evaluate both clinical and radiographic findings before extraction.
▪️ Prioritize conservative treatments when prognosis is acceptable.
▪️ In pediatric patients, assess potential harm to permanent successors.
▪️ In adults, consider systemic risk factors such as diabetes or immunosuppression.
▪️ Educate caregivers about early signs of infection to avoid severe complications.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2022). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. AAPD Clinical Guidelines. https://www.aapd.org
✔ American Dental Association. (2020). Management of dental infections. ADA Evidence-Based Guidelines. https://www.ada.org
✔ Gomes, B. P. F. A., Fernandes, A. M., Jacinto, R. C., Zaia, A. A., Ferraz, C. C. R., & Souza-Filho, F. J. (2022). Microbial profile of infected primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 32(1), 32–40.
✔ Segura-Egea, J. J., Gould, K., Şen, B. H., et al. (2017). Antibiotics in endodontics: A review. International Endodontic Journal, 50(12), 1169–1184.
✔ Trope, M., & Chivian, N. (2020). The role of endodontics after dental trauma. Dental Clinics of North America, 64(1), 197–210.

📌 More Recommended Items

Differential Diagnosis of Post-Extraction Conditions: Clinical Guide for Dentists
Post-Extraction Dental Care: How to Prevent Infections Effectively
Manual of Local Anesthesia - Anesthetic techniques and anatomical references

jueves, 27 de noviembre de 2025

Forceps Selection and Techniques by Tooth Type: Updated Clinical Guidelines

Oral Surgery

Forceps selection directly influences the efficiency, safety, and predictability of dental extractions. Evidence shows that matching the correct instrument to the tooth anatomy, root morphology, and bone density significantly reduces complications such as root fracture, alveolar bone damage, and postoperative pain.

📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Tooth Extraction Aftercare Tips ... Before extracting a tooth, the dental surgeon must instruct the patient on pre and post operative care. These recommendations are intended to protect the wound and the healing process.
This article presents an updated, SEO-optimized and evidence-based review of forceps selection and extraction techniques according to tooth type.

Advertisement

Introduction
Tooth extraction remains a core procedure in clinical dentistry. The choice of forceps must consider crown morphology, root curvature, bone density, and the periodontal condition of each tooth. A correct forceps selection enhances mechanical advantage, minimizes alveolar trauma, and improves overall procedure efficiency and patient outcomes.

📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 What is a dry socket? All you need to know ... We share a video that explains everything you need to know about dry socket: signs, symptoms, causes, and the importance of the surgeon's post-operative recommendations.
Forceps Selection by Tooth Type

1. Maxillary Teeth (Upper Teeth)

➤ Maxillary Incisors
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 1 or No. 99C
▪️ Key features: Straight beaks adapted to conical roots.
▪️ Technique notes: Labial-lingual rocking with minimal rotation.

➤ Maxillary Canines
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 150
▪️ Key features: Stronger root requiring controlled luxation.
▪️ Technique notes: Avoid excessive rotation because of long root length.

➤ Maxillary Premolars
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 150A
▪️ Key features: Thin beaks fit narrow neck morphology.
▪️ Technique notes: Buccal forces are preferred due to thin cortical bone.

➤ Maxillary Molars
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 53R/53L or No. 210S (third molars)
▪️ Key features: Curved beaks designed to engage diverging roots.
▪️ Technique notes: Buccal traction with controlled figure-eight motion.

📌 Recommended Article :
PDF 🔽 Surgical excision of mucocele with local anesthesia in an 8-month-old baby ... The mucocele has a bluish or translucent color, and its size can be from millimeters to centimeters in diameter. It is rare to find a mucocele in a newborn baby.
2. Mandibular Teeth (Lower Teeth)

➤ Mandibular Incisors
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 151
▪️ Key features: Narrow beaks for compressed cervical area.
▪️ Technique notes: Labial traction, minimal rotation.

➤ Mandibular Canines
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 151 or No. 13
▪️ Key features: Strong root anchorage.
▪️ Technique notes: Luxation must be slow to avoid root fracture.

➤ Mandibular Premolars
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 151A
▪️ Key features: Versatile angulation for narrow necks.
▪️ Technique notes: Gentle rotation is possible due to single-root anatomy.

➤ Mandibular Molars
▪️ Recommended forceps: No. 17 or No. 23 ("cowhorn")
▪️ Key features: Deep beaks fit furcations in multirooted molars.
▪️ Technique notes: For No. 23, use pumping motion to elevate tooth coronally.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Post-Extraction Complications in Pediatric Dentistry: Prevention and Management of Dry Socket ... This article reviews the etiology, clinical presentation, prevention, and management of dry socket in children, focusing on current pharmacologic and clinical strategies to ensure faster recovery and prevent recurrence.
Principles of Atraumatic Extraction

▪️ Adequate luxation before applying traction.
▪️ Stabilizing the alveolus with counter-pressure.
▪️ Avoiding excessive rotational forces in multi-rooted teeth.
▪️ Ensuring correct fulcrum position to avoid cortical plate fracture.

📊 Comparative Table: Differences Between Adult and Pediatric Forceps

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Size & Dimensions Pediatric forceps are smaller and designed to fit limited oral openings; reduce soft-tissue interference. Smaller size provides less mechanical advantage and may limit grip on large or multi-rooted teeth.
Beak Design & Adaptation Pediatric beaks are shaped to match primary tooth crowns and slender roots, minimizing accidental damage to developing permanent teeth. Adult beaks offer broader purchase on permanent tooth anatomy; pediatric beaks may not engage adequately on malformed or erupted permanent teeth.
Handle Length & Leverage Shorter handles improve control in small mouths and reduce operator hand fatigue during pediatric procedures. Reduced leverage can make difficult extractions more challenging and may necessitate adjunctive techniques (e.g., elevators).
Trauma Risk & Clinical Use Pediatric forceps tend to be less traumatic to alveolar bone and adjacent tissues when used correctly; suited for atraumatic extractions in children. Adult forceps provide greater force and may cause collateral damage in small jaws; pediatric instruments may be unavailable in some settings.
💬 Discussion
Current literature emphasizes that extraction success depends not only on clinician skill but also on matching forceps geometry to tooth anatomy. Forceps with anatomical beaks distribute forces more efficiently, reducing risk of alveolar bone damage. However, universal forceps remain valuable in pediatric and general practice settings due to their adaptability.
Newer ergonomic designs and improved steel alloys have increased precision and tactile feedback, but biomechanical principles remain unchanged: controlled force, correct fulcrum, and proper luxation are essential.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block: Risks, Complications, and Prevention ...However, due to its proximity to vital neurovascular structures, improper technique or anatomical variations can lead to neurological, vascular, and muscular complications, which may be transient or, in rare cases, permanent.
✍️ Conclusion
Correct forceps selection according to tooth type enhances procedural predictability, minimizes trauma, and improves postoperative healing. Universal forceps are practical, but anatomy-specific instruments provide superior biomechanical efficiency in complex extractions. Mastery of both instrument selection and atraumatic technique remains essential for safe and successful practice.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Use universal forceps for routine anterior extractions but switch to anatomy-specific instruments for molars.
▪️ Apply controlled luxation before traction to minimize fractures.
▪️ Incorporate clinical radiographic evaluation to anticipate root divergence, curvature, or anomalies.
▪️ Consider specialized forceps (#23 cowhorn) for mandibular molars with advanced interradicular bone loss.

📚 References

✔ Bouloux, G. F., Steed, M. B., & Perciaccante, V. J. (2007). Complications of third molar surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 19(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.009
✔ Hupp, J. R., Ellis, E., & Tucker, M. R. (2018). Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (7th ed.). Elsevier.
✔ Peterson, L. J., Ellis, E., Hupp, J. R., & Tucker, M. R. (2012). Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (3rd ed.). PMPH-USA.
✔ Tsichlaki, A., & Jones, K. (2019). Mechanical considerations in dental extractions. British Dental Journal, 226, 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-019-0077-8

📌 More Recommended Items

Anatomical Landmarks in Dental Anesthetic Techniques: A Complete Clinical Review
Marsupialization of a large mandibular cyst in a pediatric patient - Clinical Case
Manual of Local Anesthesia - Anesthetic techniques and anatomical references

How Much Fluoride Is Too Much? Updated Guidelines for Children (Including 2025 FDA Recommendations)

Fluoride

The use of fluoride in pediatric dentistry remains a cornerstone for preventing dental caries. However, updated safety concerns and new regulatory actions by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 2025) have shifted recommendations regarding systemic fluoride supplementation.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: Dosage, Frequency, and Current Controversies ... This article provides an updated academic review of fluoride use in pediatric dentistry, focusing on dosage, frequency, and current controversies.
Understanding how much fluoride is safe is essential for preventing dental fluorosis, optimizing caries prevention, and ensuring evidence-based care.

Advertisement

Overview of Fluoride and Its Clinical Relevance
Fluoride enhances enamel resistance, promotes remineralization, and reduces cariogenic bacterial activity. Despite these benefits, excessive systemic fluoride exposure during tooth development can lead to varying degrees of fluorosis. Determining the appropriate dosage depends on age, exposure sources, and caries risk.

📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 How to Apply: Clinpro Sealant - Step by step ... There are several benefits of dental sealants, for example: it contributes to good brushing, prevents the accumulation of plaque in pits and fissures, avoids the presence of cavities on the occlusal surfaces, etc.
Updated FDA Position (2025): Key Points
The FDA’s 2025 update drastically changes how systemic fluoride supplements should be prescribed in children.

➤ Key regulatory updates include:
▪️ Restriction of oral fluoride supplements (drops/tablets) to children ≥3 years old, and only when they are at high caries risk.
▪️ Identification that many systemic fluoride products were never FDA-approved, prompting regulatory action to remove them from circulation.
▪️ Emphasis on topical fluoride products as the primary preventive strategy, which remain unaffected and are considered safe.
▪️ Recognition that routine systemic supplementation provides limited benefit in primary dentition, raising concerns about unnecessary exposure.
▪️ Consideration of potential systemic effects (e.g., gut microbiome alterations), though evidence remains inconclusive.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review ... This review explores its mechanism of action, clinical indications, advantages, and limitations compared to other fluoride therapies used in pediatric dentistry.
Important note:
These updated recommendations override traditional supplementation tables commonly used in pediatric dentistry. Any systemic fluoride dosing must now be limited to older children (≥3 years), justified by documented high caries risk, and based on approved products available in the clinician’s region.

Evidence-Based Fluoride Recommendations for Children

1. Topical Fluoride (Safe and Preferred)

➤ Fluoride toothpaste (1000–1500 ppm):
▪️ Smear for less than 03 years; pea-sized for ≥3 years.
➤ Fluoride varnish (5% NaF):
▪️ Twice yearly for low risk; 3–4 times yearly for high risk.
➤ Rinses (0.05% NaF daily):
▪️ For children ≥6 years with moderate/high caries risk.

2. Systemic Fluoride (Now Highly Restricted)
Following the FDA 2025 guidance, systemic supplements should:

▪️ Be considered only for children ≥3 years.
▪️ Be prescribed only in high-risk cases.
▪️ Avoid use in areas with optimally fluoridated water.
▪️ Use the minimal effective dose if supplementation is deemed necessary.

Classic dosing tables remain referenced in literature but may not align with FDA restrictions.

📊 Comparative Table: Topical vs. Systemic Fluoride in Children (2025 Update)

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Topical Fluoride High caries prevention; minimal systemic absorption; FDA-safe Requires parental supervision to avoid ingestion
Systemic Fluoride (2025 restricted) Useful only in high-risk children without fluoridated water FDA restrictions; risk of fluorosis; limited benefit in primary dentition

💬 Discussion
The evolution of fluoride guidelines reflects a broader shift toward individualized, risk-based caries prevention. The 2025 FDA regulatory action emphasizes the importance of safety, approval status, and actual clinical benefit, particularly regarding systemic fluoride products. Meanwhile, topical fluoride modalities remain the most effective and safest strategies for preventing caries without increasing fluorosis risk.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Latest FDA Guidelines (2025) on Fluoride Use in Children: What Dentists Need to Know ... It also reviews the role of topical fluoride, professional responses, and best-practice recommendations for pediatric dentists.
🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Prioritize topical fluoride as the primary preventive approach.
▪️ Use systemic fluoride only when strictly indicated, following updated FDA criteria.
▪️ Evaluate each child’s total fluoride exposure, including water, toothpaste ingestion, and diet.
▪️ Educate parents on safe brushing practices to minimize swallowing.
▪️ Monitor for early signs of dental fluorosis in high-risk communities.

✍️ Conclusion
Determining how much fluoride is “too much” requires balancing preventive benefits with safety, especially in developing dentition. The 2025 FDA restrictions reinforce a conservative approach to systemic fluoride use and highlight topical fluoride as the mainstay of pediatric caries prevention. Clinicians must remain updated and tailor fluoride exposure to each child’s unique risk factors.

📚 References

✔ American Dental Association. (2023). Fluoride: Topical and Systemic Benefits. https://www.ada.org
✔ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Community water fluoridation: Recommendations and guidelines. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/
✔ Contemporary Pediatrics. (2025). FDA restricts sale of unapproved ingestible fluoride drugs for children. https://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/view/fda-restricts-sale-of-unapproved-ingestible-fluoride-drugs-for-children
✔ U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025a). Ingestible Fluoride Drug Products: Public Health Advisory. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/public-health-focus/ingestible-fluoride-drug-products
✔ U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025b). FDA acts to remove unapproved systemic fluoride drug products for children. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/

📌 More Recommended Items

Fluoride Recommendations for Children in the US: What Parents Should Know
Fluoride Varnish in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits, Indications, Mechanism, and Application Protocol
Fluoride Varnish in the Prevention of Dental Caries in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

martes, 25 de noviembre de 2025

Dental Fistula in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Evidence-Based Treatment

Dental Fistula

A dental fistula in children—also known as a parulis or gum boil—is a pathological drainage pathway that forms as a result of a chronic dental infection, usually originating from pulp necrosis due to deep caries or trauma.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Facial Cellulitis vs. Angioedema in Dental Emergencies: Key Differences, Severity, and Management ... Facial cellulitis and angioedema are two potentially life-threatening conditions frequently encountered in dental emergencies. Although both present with facial swelling, they differ significantly in etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment approach.
Although often painless, a fistula indicates the presence of an active infectious process that requires immediate dental intervention. Understanding its etiology, clinical presentation, and management is essential for effective pediatric care.

Advertisement

Etiology of Dental Fistula in Pediatric Patients
The most frequent causes include:

1. Deep Dental Caries
The primary cause is untreated dental caries that lead to irreversible pulpitis and ultimately pulp necrosis. This allows bacterial proliferation and abscess development, culminating in fistula formation.

2. Dental Trauma
Trauma—particularly in anterior teeth—may cause pulpal ischemia and necrosis, increasing the risk of chronic periapical infection.

3. Developmental Anomalies
Anomalies such as dens invaginatus or enamel defects increase susceptibility to pulp exposure and infection.

4. Failed Dental Treatments
Incomplete pulpotomies, pulpectomies, or restorations can predispose the tooth to persistent infection.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 What Are the Symptoms of a Dental Infection? ... Dental infections typically arise from untreated dental caries, periodontal disease, or trauma that allows bacteria to invade the pulp or surrounding tissues.
Clinical Characteristics
A pediatric dental fistula typically presents as:

▪️ A small, raised white or yellowish lesion on the gingiva or mucosa
▪️ Intermittent pus drainage
▪️ Minimal pain (because pressure is released)
▪️ A necrotic primary or permanent tooth
▪️ Radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency

The fistula itself is not the disease, but a symptom of the underlying infection.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Dental Abscesses in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Management in 2025 ... This article reviews evidence-based approaches (2025) for diagnosis, management, and prevention, highlighting the importance of early intervention to preserve oral and general health.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is primarily clinical, supported by:

➤ Radiographic Evaluation
▪️ Periapical radiograph or CBCT to identify periapical pathology
▪️ Tracing the fistulous tract with a gutta-percha cone
➤ Pulp Vitality Testing
Useful for permanent teeth; typically unreliable in primary teeth.
➤ Caries and Trauma Assessment
Determining the original source of infection is essential for treatment.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Preventing Dental Emergencies in Primary Dentition: Caries, Abscesses and Early Intervention ... This article examines preventive strategies to reduce dental emergencies in primary dentition, focusing on early childhood caries, dental abscesses, and the role of early intervention in maintaining oral health.
Evidence-Based Treatment of Dental Fistula in Children
The goal is not to treat the fistula itself, but to eliminate the source of infection.

1. Pulp Therapy or Root Canal Treatment
▪️ Primary teeth: pulpectomy using resorbable materials
▪️ Permanent teeth: conventional root canal therapy
This eliminates bacterial load and restores periapical health.

2. Extraction of Non-Restorable Teeth
Indicated when:

▪️ The tooth has severe destruction
▪️ There is pathological mobility
▪️ Infection persists despite treatment

3. Systemic Antibiotics
Antibiotics are not first-line treatment but may be used when:

▪️ Facial cellulitis is present
▪️ The child has systemic symptoms (fever, malaise)
▪️ The infection is rapidly progressing

➤ Common pediatric antibiotic doses:
▪️ Amoxicillin: 40–50 mg/kg/day divided every 8–12 h
▪️ Amoxicillin + Clavulanate: 40–45 mg/kg/day (based on amoxicillin component) every 12 h
▪️ Clindamycin (penicillin allergy): 10–20 mg/kg/day divided every 6–8 h

These are evidence-based pediatric doses, but clinicians must consider weight, severity, and guidelines.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Managing Pediatric Odontogenic Infections: Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Treatment Guidelines ... Odontogenic infections in children are frequent emergencies in pediatric dentistry. They arise from bacterial invasion of dental pulp and surrounding tissues, commonly due to untreated caries or trauma.
Prevention Strategies

▪️ Early and routine dental visits
▪️ Fluoride therapy for caries prevention
▪️ Restoration of early carious lesions
▪️ Traumatic injury prevention counseling
▪️ Sealants for high-risk occlusal surfaces

📊 Comparative Table: Management Approaches for Pediatric Dental Fistula

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Pulp Therapy (Pulpectomy) Preserves tooth structure; high success in primary teeth Requires child cooperation; not suitable for severely damaged teeth
Extraction Eliminates infection quickly; simple procedure May affect occlusion and arch space; requires space maintenance

💬 Discussion
A pediatric dental fistula is the result of a long-standing infectious process, most commonly linked to untreated caries, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and preventive dentistry. While fistulas may appear benign due to absence of pain, they reflect chronic periapical pathology that may compromise both primary and permanent dentition. Evidence indicates that definitive dental treatment, not antibiotics, is the most effective approach. When treated appropriately, prognosis is excellent and recurrence is rare.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Key Differences Between Pediatric and Adult Odontogenic Infections: Updated Clinical Guidelines ... This article outlines the major anatomical, clinical, and therapeutic distinctions between pediatric and adult odontogenic infections, highlighting the need for age-specific diagnosis and treatment approaches.
✍️ Conclusion
A dental fistula in children is a visible sign of an underlying infection requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Elimination of the infectious source —whether through pulp therapy or extraction—is essential for complete healing. Preventive strategies remain key to avoiding severe complications and maintaining long-term pediatric oral health.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Evaluate any gingival lesion suspicious of a fistula with radiographs.
▪️ Treat the source of infection—not just the fistula.
▪️ Avoid unnecessary antibiotic use.
▪️ Emphasize prevention through caregiver education.
▪️ Monitor treated teeth until complete radiographic healing is confirmed.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2024). Guideline on antibiotic therapy for pediatric dental patients. AAPD Reference Manual. https://www.aapd.org
✔ Fuks, A. B., Papagiannoulis, L., & Duggal, M. S. (2021). Pulp therapy for primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 31(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12701
✔ Siqueira, J. F., & Rôças, I. N. (2023). The microbiology of apical periodontitis. Dental Clinics of North America, 67(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2022.08.001
✔ Robertson, A., & Andreasen, J. O. (2019). Traumatic dental injuries in children. Pediatric Dentistry, 41(3), 210–218.

📌 More Recommended Items

Surgical excision of mucocele with local anesthesia in an 8-month-old baby
Odontogenic facial cellulitis in a pediatric patient - Diagnosis, treatment and multidisciplinary management
Odontogenic infection in facial spaces - Pharmacological and surgical management in pediatric patients

Antibiotics in Pediatric Dentistry: Safe Indications, Correct Dosing, and Common Prescribing Errors

Antibiotics

Antibiotic prescribing in children requires strict clinical criteria to prevent resistance, adverse effects, and therapeutic failure. This article provides updated guidance on indications, dosing, common mistakes, and safe alternatives in pediatric dental infections.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Analgesic and Antibiotic Recommendations in Pediatric Oral Surgery ... Pediatric oral surgery includes extractions, frenectomies, and management of odontogenic infections, which may lead to postoperative pain and inflammation. Selecting appropriate analgesic and antibiotic therapy is essential to ensure safety, comfort, and recovery while minimizing adverse reactions and resistance.
Introduction
Pediatric dental infections are primarily managed through local treatment, not antibiotics. Despite this, unnecessary prescriptions remain common. Understanding when antibiotics are essential and how to prescribe them safely and effectively is crucial for pediatric dentists.

Advertisement

Indications for Antibiotics in Pediatric Dentistry
Antibiotics are indicated only when an infection spreads beyond the tooth, shows systemic involvement, or cannot be controlled with local measures.

➤ Evidence-based indications
▪️ Facial swelling with extraoral cellulitis
▪️ Lymphadenitis associated with dental infection
▪️ Fever, malaise, or trismus indicating systemic spread
▪️ Acute dental abscess with spreading infection
▪️ Immunocompromised pediatric patients
▪️ Post-trauma infection when contamination is high

➤ Non-indications (Do NOT prescribe)
▪️ Localized pulpitis
▪️ Local dental abscess without systemic signs
▪️ Pain without infection
▪️ After routine extractions
▪️ Viral lesions (herpetic gingivostomatitis)

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Amoxicillin vs Clindamycin in Pediatric Dentistry: Updated Clinical Guide 2025 ... Choosing between amoxicillin and clindamycin in pediatric dentistry requires a clear understanding of their mechanisms of action, clinical indications, weight-based dosing formulas, and safety profiles.
Pediatric Dosage Recommendations (By Infection Type)

➤ First-line antibiotic: Amoxicillin
▪️ Dose: 20–40 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours
▪️ Indications: odontogenic cellulitis, abscess with systemic signs

➤ Severe infections or concern for resistance: Amoxicillin–Clavulanate
▪️ Dose: 25–45 mg/kg/day (amoxicillin component), divided every 12 hours
▪️ Indications: spreading cellulitis, failure of first-line therapy

➤ Penicillin allergy (non-anaphylactic): Cephalexin
▪️ Dose: 25–50 mg/kg/day divided every 6–12 hours
▪️ Indications: mild to moderate odontogenic infections

➤ Penicillin allergy (anaphylactic): Clindamycin
▪️ Dose: 10–25 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours
▪️ Indications: severe infections, cellulitis, deep-space involvement

➤ Anaerobic dominance suspected: Metronidazole
▪️ Dose: 7.5 mg/kg every 8 hours
▪️ Always used in combination with amoxicillin

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Pediatric Dentistry: When and How to Use It Safely in 2025 ... Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric dentistry is a preventive measure used to avoid serious systemic infections, such as infective endocarditis, in children undergoing dental procedures.
Common Prescribing Errors in Pediatric Dentistry

➤ Overuse of antibiotics
One of the most recurrent issues. Local treatment (pulpotomy, drainage, extraction) is often sufficient.

➤ Incorrect dosing
Underdosing promotes resistance; overdosing increases toxicity. Weight-based calculation is essential.

➤ Wrong duration
For odontogenic infections: 5–7 days is typically enough; prolonged courses offer no benefit.

➤ Treating viral diseases with antibiotics
Herpetic gingivostomatitis or recurrent aphthae do not require antibiotics.

➤ Prescribing without drainage
Antibiotics do not replace surgical management.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Updated Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Dentistry: Evidence-Based Recommendations ... This article discusses updated, evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic use in pediatric dental care, focusing on clinical indications, dosage, and the importance of antimicrobial stewardship.
Safe Alternatives to Antibiotic Use

➤ Local interventions
▪️ Drainage
vPulp therapy
▪️ Extraction
▪️ Irrigation

➤ Analgesic management
▪️ Acetaminophen: 10–15 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours
▪️ Ibuprofen: 10 mg/kg every 6–8 hours

➤ Adjunctive measures
▪️ Warm compresses
▪️ Oral hygiene reinforcement
▪️ Monitoring within 24–48 hours

📊 Comparative Table: Safe Alternatives vs Antibiotic Therapy

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Local Treatment (Drainage, Pulp Therapy) Addresses the source of infection; avoids antibiotic exposure Requires cooperation and may not be feasible in severe cases
Systemic Antibiotics Useful when infection spreads or systemic signs are present Risk of resistance, adverse reactions, and misuse

💬 Discussion
The misuse of antibiotics in pediatric dentistry contributes to global antimicrobial resistance. Proper prescribing requires understanding infection pathways, pediatric physiology, and pharmacology. Local treatment remains the cornerstone of management, while antibiotics play a supportive role only when clinically necessary.

📌 Recommended Article :
PDF 🔽 Antibiotics in dental infections in children. Which one to use? ... We share a study that analyzes the characteristics and use of the most widely used antibiotics in pediatric dentistry during a dental infection.
✍️ Conclusion
Appropriate antibiotic use in pediatric dentistry demands strict adherence to indications, accurate weight-based dosing, and avoidance of unnecessary prescriptions. Implementing evidence-based practices ensures effective management while reducing risks of resistance and adverse effects.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Always confirm systemic involvement before prescribing.
▪️ Choose first-line agents based on current pediatric guidelines.
▪️ Calculate doses by body weight, not age.
▪️ Reassess within 48 hours for clinical improvement.
▪️ Educate parents on correct administration and adherence.

📚 References

✔ Brook, I. (2017). The role of antibiotics in pediatric dental infections. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(5), 325–331.
✔ Wright, J. T., Tampi, M. P., Graham, L., Estrich, C., et al. (2018). Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for antibiotic use in pediatric dental patients. Journal of the American Dental Association, 149(11), 906–921.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.08.020
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Use of antibiotic therapy for pediatric dental patients. AAPD Reference Manual.

📌 More Recommended Items

Pharmacologic management for pediatric dental patients
Guideline on use of antibiotic therapy for pediatric dental patients
Medications and Developing Teeth: Dental Risks, Mechanisms, and Prevention in Children