Vital vs. Non-Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Dentistry: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Guide

Pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry aims to preserve the function and integrity of primary and young permanent teeth affected by caries or trauma. The selection between vital pulp therapies and non-vital pulp therapies depends on accurate diagnosis, pulp status, root development, and the strategic importance of the tooth.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... Understanding their clinical presentation, etiology, and management in both adults and children is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

Understanding these therapeutic approaches is essential for achieving long-term success while maintaining normal occlusal development and oral health.

Advertisement

✅ Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Dentistry
Vital pulp therapy (VPT) is indicated when the pulp remains partially or fully vital and capable of healing.

Common Vital Pulp Procedures
▪️ Indirect pulp treatment (IPT)
▪️ Direct pulp capping
▪️ Pulpotomy

Clinical Indications
▪️ Reversible pulp inflammation
▪️ Absence of spontaneous pain
▪️ No radiographic signs of periapical or furcal pathology

Advantages
▪️ Preserves pulp vitality and proprioception
▪️ Promotes continued root development
▪️ Minimally invasive and biologically conservative

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

✅ Non-Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Dentistry
Non-vital pulp therapy is indicated when the pulp is irreversibly inflamed or necrotic.

Common Non-Vital Procedures
▪️ Pulpectomy in primary teeth
▪️ Root canal treatment in permanent teeth

Clinical Indications
▪️ Irreversible pulpitis
▪️ Pulp necrosis
▪️ Presence of fistula, abscess, or pathological mobility

Advantages
▪️ Eliminates infection
▪️ Maintains arch length
▪️ Prevents premature tooth loss

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Its biological properties, high alkalinity, and ability to stimulate hard tissue formation have made it a cornerstone in pulp therapy procedures.

✅ Key Differences Between Vital and Non-Vital Pulp Therapies
The fundamental distinction lies in the biological status of the pulp and the therapeutic objective—preservation versus removal.

▪️ Vital therapies aim to maintain pulp health and physiological function
▪️ Non-vital therapies aim to control infection and prevent systemic spread

📊 Comparative Table: Pulp Therapy in Primary vs. Permanent Dentition

Clinical Aspect	Primary Dentition	Permanent Dentition
Main Therapeutic Goal	Maintain tooth until natural exfoliation	Preserve tooth for lifelong function
Pulpotomy Indication	Commonly indicated in vital pulp exposures	Limited to immature permanent teeth
Pulpectomy Considerations	Requires resorbable filling materials	Uses permanent obturation materials
Root Anatomy	Complex, thin, and physiologically resorbing	Stable anatomy without resorption
Impact on Success Rate	Highly dependent on diagnosis and case selection	Higher predictability with standardized protocols

💬 Discussion
Current evidence supports conservative pulp management whenever possible, particularly in primary teeth. Advances in bioactive materials such as MTA and calcium silicate-based cements have improved the success rates of vital pulp therapies. However, delayed diagnosis or inadequate case selection can compromise outcomes, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive clinical and radiographic assessment.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Prioritize pulp vitality whenever diagnostic criteria allow
▪️ Use rubber dam isolation in all pulp therapy procedures
▪️ Select biocompatible, evidence-based materials
▪️ Schedule periodic clinical and radiographic follow-up

✍️ Conclusion
Vital and non-vital pulp therapies are complementary strategies in pediatric dentistry, each with clearly defined indications. Proper diagnosis, understanding of dentition-specific anatomy, and adherence to evidence-based protocols are essential to ensure long-term clinical success and optimal oral development in pediatric patients.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry, 405–414.
✔ Coll, J. A., Seale, N. S., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Al Shamali, S., & Graham, L. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–123.
✔ Dhar, V., Marghalani, A. A., Crystal, Y. O., Kumar, A., Ritwik, P., Tulunoglu, O., & Graham, L. (2017). Use of vital pulp therapies in primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(5), 146–159.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pain Management in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Best Anesthetics and Clinical Techniques
► Webinar: Vital Pulp Therapy: A Conservative Alternative in the Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions
► Pulp Therapy in Pediatric Dentistry: Complete and Updated Guide

Pain Management in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Best Anesthetics and Clinical Techniques

Pain control is a critical determinant of success in pediatric pulp therapy, directly influencing treatment outcomes, child cooperation, and future dental attitudes. Inadequate anesthesia may result in procedural discomfort, heightened anxiety, and long-term dental fear.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Anatomical Landmarks in Dental Anesthetic Techniques: A Complete Clinical Review ... This article reviews the main anatomical references for each local anesthetic technique in both adult and pediatric patients, emphasizing clinical precision and anatomical variations.

Therefore, effective pain management in children undergoing pulp therapy requires a comprehensive understanding of anesthetic agents, injection techniques, and child-specific anatomical and psychological considerations. This article reviews the best anesthetics and evidence-based techniques currently recommended for pediatric pulp treatments.

Advertisement

✅ Anesthetic Agents Commonly Used in Pediatric Dentistry

Lidocaine (2% with epinephrine 1:100,000)
Lidocaine remains the gold standard local anesthetic in pediatric dentistry due to its rapid onset, adequate depth of anesthesia, and well-documented safety profile.

Articaine (4% with epinephrine 1:100,000)
Articaine provides enhanced bone penetration, making it effective for infiltration anesthesia in mandibular primary molars. However, its use in young children must be carefully dosed.

Mepivacaine (3% plain)
Indicated when vasoconstrictors are contraindicated, mepivacaine offers moderate duration anesthesia but reduced hemostasis.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Diclofenac, Ibuprofen, or Acetaminophen - Which Analgesic Should Be Used in Dentistry? ... Understanding these differences is essential for selecting the most appropriate analgesic according to the clinical scenario, patient systemic conditions, and inflammatory involvement.

✅ Anesthetic Techniques for Pulp Therapy in Children

Infiltration Anesthesia
Preferred for maxillary teeth and increasingly effective in mandibular primary molars due to thinner cortical bone.

Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block
Indicated for extensive mandibular pulp therapy but associated with higher failure rates and postoperative soft tissue trauma.

Supplemental Techniques
▪️ Intraligamentary anesthesia
▪️ Intrapulpal anesthesia (used only when other techniques fail)
These approaches enhance pain control during inflamed pulpal procedures.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Common Local Anesthetics Used in Children — Dosage and Safety Limits (Clinical Guide) ... Understanding the dosage limits, pharmacology, and safety profiles of common local anesthetics used in children allows clinicians to minimize adverse events and achieve optimal operative conditions.

✅ Pain Modulation Strategies Beyond Anesthesia
Adjunctive methods such as behavior guidance techniques, topical anesthetics, slow injection rates, and age-appropriate communication significantly improve perceived pain control. The combination of pharmacological and psychological strategies is essential for optimal pediatric pain management.

💬 Discussion
Despite advances in anesthetic pharmacology, pain during pediatric pulp therapy remains a clinical challenge, particularly in teeth with irreversible pulp inflammation. Studies demonstrate that articaine infiltration may outperform traditional nerve blocks in primary mandibular molars, reducing discomfort and soft tissue injury. However, technique sensitivity, dosage accuracy, and patient behavior remain critical variables influencing anesthetic success.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pediatric Dental Pain Management: When to Use Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, or Combination Therapy ... Pediatric dental pain is one of the most common reasons for emergency dental visits in children, often associated with caries, pulpitis, dental trauma, or postoperative discomfort.

🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Select anesthetic agents based on patient age, medical history, and procedure type
▪️ Prefer infiltration techniques whenever clinically feasible
▪️ Use supplemental anesthesia when conventional methods are insufficient
▪️ Combine anesthesia with non-pharmacological behavior management

✍️ Conclusion
Effective pain management in pediatric pulp therapy relies on appropriate anesthetic selection, precise technique, and child-centered care. Evidence supports the use of modern local anesthetics and minimally invasive approaches to enhance comfort and cooperation. When applied correctly, these strategies improve clinical outcomes and foster positive long-term dental experiences in children.

📊 Comparative Table: Common Pulp Therapy Treatments in Pediatric Dentistry

Pulp Therapy Procedure	Clinical Indications	Key Considerations
Indirect pulp treatment	Deep caries without pulp exposure	Requires accurate caries removal and sealing
Direct pulp capping	Small mechanical or traumatic exposure	Limited indication in primary teeth
Pulpotomy	Vital pulp with coronal inflammation	Adequate anesthesia essential for success
Pulpectomy	Necrotic or irreversibly inflamed pulp	More complex and time-consuming procedure

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 343–351.
✔ Arrow, P. (2018). Pain management for pulp therapy in primary molar teeth. Australian Dental Journal, 63(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12594
✔ Malamed, S. F. (2020). Handbook of local anesthesia (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
✔ Wright, G. Z., Kupietzky, A., & Martinez Mier, E. A. (2014). Behavior management in dentistry for children (2nd ed.). Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Managing Dental Anxiety in Children: Techniques for Clinicians
► Non-Opioid Pain Management in Dentistry: ADA Recommendations
► Dental Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry: Safe Procedures, Clinical Tips, and Best Practices

One-Visit Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: Is It Safe and Effective?

Pulpectomy is a common endodontic procedure in pediatric dentistry aimed at preserving primary teeth affected by irreversible pulp pathology. Traditionally performed over multiple visits, the procedure has evolved with improved materials and techniques.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

One-visit pulpectomy in primary teeth has gained attention for its efficiency, child-friendly approach, and comparable success rates. However, questions remain regarding its safety and long-term effectiveness.

Advertisement

✅ What Is One-Visit Pulpectomy?
One-visit pulpectomy involves complete removal of necrotic or inflamed pulp tissue, canal disinfection, obturation, and coronal sealing in a single appointment. Advances in instrumentation, irrigation protocols, and obturating materials have made this approach increasingly feasible.
The primary objective is to eliminate infection while minimizing patient discomfort and treatment time.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

✅ Indications and Case Selection
Appropriate case selection is critical. One-visit pulpectomy is generally indicated when:

▪️ The child is cooperative or behavior management is limited
▪️ There is no acute swelling or systemic involvement
▪️ Canal anatomy is manageable
▪️ Adequate isolation can be achieved
Teeth with extensive periapical pathology or uncontrolled infection may still benefit from multi-visit treatment.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

✅ Safety Considerations
Current evidence suggests that one-visit pulpectomy is safe when proper disinfection and obturation protocols are followed. The use of resorbable filling materials compatible with physiological root resorption is essential.

Potential concerns include:
▪️ Incomplete microbial elimination
▪️ Risk of postoperative flare-ups
However, studies show no significant increase in postoperative complications compared to multi-visit approaches.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

✅ Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes
Clinical success is evaluated based on:

▪️ Absence of pain or swelling
▪️ Radiographic resolution or stability of periapical lesions
▪️ Normal exfoliation timing
Success rates of one-visit pulpectomy are comparable to multi-visit protocols, particularly when modern materials such as calcium hydroxide–iodoform pastes are used.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Clinical Pulpectomy Protocol: Updated Step-by-Step Guide ... Pulpectomy is a predictable and effective procedure when performed following a rigorous clinical protocol. The selection of obturation material plays a crucial role in the long-term success of the treatment.

💬 Discussion
The debate between one-visit and multi-visit pulpectomy mirrors broader discussions in endodontics. While multi-visit procedures allow for intracanal medicaments, evidence increasingly supports that effective mechanical and chemical disinfection in a single visit can achieve similar outcomes. In pediatric dentistry, reduced chair time and improved patient cooperation are significant advantages.

✍️ Conclusion
One-visit pulpectomy in primary teeth is a safe and effective treatment option when appropriate case selection and strict clinical protocols are followed. Its advantages in pediatric behavior management and treatment efficiency make it an attractive alternative to traditional multi-visit approaches.

📌 Recommended Article :

PDF 🔽 What is the best pulp dressing for pulpotomies in primary teeth? - Review ... Different pulp dressings have been used in pulpotomies, each with different characteristics and properties. The article we share compares all pulp dressings to determine which is the most effective.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Select cases carefully based on infection status and child cooperation
▪️ Use resorbable obturating materials compatible with primary teeth
▪️ Ensure adequate irrigation and canal disinfection
▪️ Reserve multi-visit pulpectomy for acute or complex cases

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 325–334.
✔ Mortazavi, M., & Mesbahi, M. (2004). Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 14(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00544.x
✔ Raslan, N., & Wetzel, W. E. (2006). Ex vivo evaluation of root canal obturation quality in primary incisors. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 16(5), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00750.x
✔ Coll, J. A., et al. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–27.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Manual of diagnosis and pulp treatment in non-vital primary teeth
► Pulp Therapy Procedures Manual for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth
► Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure

Modern Alternatives to Calcium Hydroxide Apexification

Management of immature permanent teeth with necrotic pulp has historically relied on calcium hydroxide apexification. However, advances in biomaterials and regenerative biology have significantly changed clinical decision-making.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Calcium hydroxide continues to be a valuable material in pediatric dentistry, particularly in regions where access to advanced biomaterials is limited. Its strong antimicrobial activity and ability to induce reparative dentinogenesis are undeniable strengths.

Today, regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apical barriers are increasingly preferred due to their predictable outcomes, reduced treatment time, and superior biological response.

Advertisement

✅ Traditional Calcium Hydroxide Apexification: Limitations
Calcium hydroxide apexification aims to induce the formation of a calcified apical barrier over several months. Despite its historical importance, multiple disadvantages have been documented:

▪️ Prolonged treatment time, often exceeding 6–18 months
▪️ Increased risk of root fracture due to long-term dentin exposure
▪️ Multiple patient visits, compromising compliance
▪️ Unpredictable apical closure morphology
Long-term calcium hydroxide use weakens radicular dentin, increasing susceptibility to cervical fractures.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Open Apex Management in Traumatized Teeth: Latest Evidence-Based Recommendations ... Open apex management in traumatized teeth aims to control infection, preserve tooth structure, and promote continued root development or apical closure using evidence-based techniques.

✅ MTA Apical Barriers: A More Predictable Alternative
The introduction of MTA revolutionized apexification by allowing immediate apical barrier formation in one or two visits.

Key advantages include:
▪️ Excellent biocompatibility and bioactivity
▪️ Superior sealing ability
▪️ Reduced treatment duration
▪️ High clinical success rates
MTA apical barriers provide a reliable artificial stop, enabling effective obturation without prolonged intracanal medication.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards ... Despite these advantages, their use as permanent sealers has increasingly been questioned as treatment goals shifted toward predictable, long-term apical sealing and structural integrity.

✅ Regenerative Endodontics: A Paradigm Shift
Regenerative endodontic procedures aim to restore pulp vitality and promote continued root development, rather than simply closing the apex.

Clinical benefits include:
▪️ Increase in root length and dentin thickness
▪️ Improved fracture resistance
▪️ Potential revascularization of the pulp space
Regenerative endodontics aligns with modern minimally invasive and biologically driven dentistry, especially in young patients.

📊 Comparative Table: Properties of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA)

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Biocompatibility	Excellent tissue tolerance and minimal inflammatory response	May cause mild initial inflammation during setting
Sealing ability	Superior marginal seal even in moist environments	Technique-sensitive placement
Bioactivity	Stimulates hard tissue formation and cementogenesis	Long setting time compared to newer bioceramics
Clinical longevity	High long-term success rates in apexification and perforation repair	Higher cost than traditional materials

💬 Discussion
While calcium hydroxide apexification remains a viable option in selected cases, current evidence strongly favors MTA apical barriers and regenerative techniques. MTA provides predictable outcomes when root development cannot be restored, whereas regenerative endodontics offers true tissue healing and maturation when biological conditions allow.
Case selection, clinician expertise, and patient age play critical roles in choosing the appropriate modality.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry ... The evolution of pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry has shifted from traditional medicaments to bioactive biomaterials that promote regeneration and tissue healing.

✍️ Conclusion
Traditional calcium hydroxide apexification is being replaced due to its biological limitations and mechanical risks. MTA apical barriers and regenerative endodontics represent evidence-based, modern alternatives that improve clinical outcomes, reduce treatment time, and preserve tooth structure.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Prefer regenerative endodontics in immature teeth with favorable apical anatomy
▪️ Use MTA apical barriers when regeneration is not feasible
▪️ Limit long-term calcium hydroxide use due to fracture risk
▪️ Base treatment decisions on radiographic findings, patient age, and compliance

📚 References

✔ American Association of Endodontists. (2016). Clinical considerations for a regenerative procedure. Journal of Endodontics, 42(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.017
✔ Banchs, F., & Trope, M. (2004). Revascularization of immature permanent teeth with apical periodontitis. Journal of Endodontics, 30(4), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200404000-00003
✔ Torabinejad, M., & Parirokh, M. (2010). Mineral trioxide aggregate: A comprehensive literature review—Part II. Journal of Endodontics, 36(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.010
✔ Andreasen, J. O., Farik, B., & Munksgaard, E. C. (2002). Long-term calcium hydroxide as a root canal dressing may increase risk of root fracture. Dental Traumatology, 18(3), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00097.x

📌 More Recommended Items

► Complete Guide to Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth: Materials, Techniques, and Success Rates
► Triple Antibiotic Paste in Dentistry: Benefits, Clinical Applications, and Evidence-Based Advantages
► Updated Antibiotic Therapy in Pediatric Dentistry: Evidence-Based Protocols for Acute Infections

Pulpotomy Failure in Primary Teeth: Causes, Early Warning Signs, and Evidence-Based Prevention

Pulpotomy is one of the most common vital pulp therapies in pediatric dentistry, aiming to preserve primary teeth affected by deep caries while maintaining function until natural exfoliation.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

Despite its high success rates when properly indicated, pulpotomy failure remains a clinically relevant concern, often leading to pain, infection, or premature tooth loss.

Advertisement

Understanding why pulpotomies fail, how to identify early warning signs, and how to prevent unfavorable outcomes is essential for long-term success and optimal pediatric oral health.

✅ What Is Pulpotomy Failure?
Pulpotomy failure occurs when inflammation or infection progresses beyond the coronal pulp, affecting the radicular pulp or surrounding tissues. This failure may be clinical, radiographic, or both, and can appear weeks or months after treatment.
Failure does not necessarily indicate poor technique alone—it is often the result of multifactorial biological and restorative factors.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Pulp Therapy Fails: Risk Factors, Clinical Errors, and Evidence-Based Solutions ... Pulp therapy is a cornerstone of both pediatric and adult restorative dentistry. However, despite advances in materials and techniques, treatment failure remains a relevant clinical challenge.

✅ Main Causes of Pulpotomy Failure

1. Incorrect Case Selection
Performing pulpotomy on teeth with irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp significantly increases failure risk.
➤ Common red flags include:
▪️ Spontaneous pain
▪️ Swelling or sinus tract
▪️ Pathologic mobility
▪️ Furcation radiolucency at baseline

2. Inadequate Hemostasis
Failure to achieve proper hemostasis after coronal pulp removal suggests radicular pulp inflammation, which compromises prognosis.

3. Bacterial Microleakage
Poor coronal seal allows salivary and bacterial contamination, leading to reinfection of the pulp tissue.

4. Suboptimal Restorative Coverage
Lack of full coronal coverage, especially in multi-surface lesions, increases the risk of restoration breakdown and microleakage.

5. Material-Related Factors
Although modern materials show improved outcomes, incorrect manipulation or improper placement can reduce their effectiveness.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth is a cornerstone of pediatric dental treatment. Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

✅ Early Clinical and Radiographic Signs of Failure
Early detection is critical to avoid more invasive treatment.

➤ Clinical Signs
▪️ Persistent or recurrent pain
▪️ Gingival swelling or abscess formation
▪️ Increased tooth mobility
▪️ Sensitivity to percussion

➤ Radiographic Signs
▪️ Furcation radiolucency
▪️ Internal or external root resorption
▪️ Widening of the periodontal ligament
▪️ Periapical pathology
Radiographic follow-up is essential, as some failures remain asymptomatic in early stages.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Calcium hydroxide has been one of the most widely used biomaterials in pediatric dentistry for several decades. Its biological properties, high alkalinity, and ability to stimulate hard tissue formation have made it a cornerstone in pulp therapy procedures.

💬 Discussion
Recent evidence confirms that pulpotomy success is highly dependent on accurate diagnosis, strict asepsis, and durable coronal restoration. Systematic reviews demonstrate that failures are more commonly linked to diagnostic errors and restorative leakage than to the pulpotomy medicament itself.
Modern bioactive materials have improved outcomes; however, they do not compensate for poor case selection or inadequate isolation. Therefore, pulpotomy should be considered a biologically sensitive procedure, not merely a mechanical intervention.

✅ How to Prevent Pulpotomy Failure

Evidence-Based Preventive Strategies
▪️ Strict adherence to case selection criteria
▪️ Achieve complete hemostasis within a few minutes
▪️ Use rubber dam isolation whenever possible
▪️ Ensure hermetic coronal sealing
▪️ Prefer full-coverage restorations in posterior primary teeth
▪️ Schedule regular clinical and radiographic follow-up
Prevention begins before the bur touches the tooth.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulp Polyps in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options in Pediatric Dentistry ... Chronic hyperplastic pulpitis, commonly referred to as a pulp polyp, is a non-neoplastic, benign proliferation of pulpal tissue. It is often observed in children and adolescents, attributed to their rich pulpal vascularity and strong immune response.

✍️ Conclusion
Pulpotomy failure in primary teeth is largely preventable when evidence-based protocols are followed. Proper diagnosis, meticulous technique, and durable restoration are far more influential than the choice of medicament alone. Early recognition of failure signs allows timely intervention, preserving function and preventing infection-related complications in pediatric patients.

📊 Comparative Table: Key Factors Influencing Pulpotomy Outcomes

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Proper case selection	Improves long-term success and pulp healing	Requires accurate clinical judgment
Effective coronal seal	Prevents bacterial microleakage	Dependent on restoration quality
Full-coverage restoration	Enhances durability and tooth survival	Higher cost and chair time
Regular follow-up	Allows early detection of failure	Relies on patient compliance

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 380–392.
✔ Coll, J. A., Seale, N. S., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Al Shamali, S., & Graham, L. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–23.
✔ Holan, G., & Fuks, A. B. (2013). A comparison of pulpotomy using ferric sulfate and mineral trioxide aggregate in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry, 35(1), 13–18.
✔ Peng, L., Ye, L., Tan, H., & Zhou, X. (2007). Evaluation of the formocresol versus mineral trioxide aggregate primary molar pulpotomy: A meta-analysis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 103(6), e40–e44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.008

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons
► Clinical Pulpectomy Protocol: Updated Step-by-Step Guide
► Irrigants in Pediatric Pulpectomies: Key Benefits, Properties, and U.S. Commercial Brands

Calcium Hydroxide as a Long-Term Endodontic Sealer: Why It No Longer Meets Modern Biomechanical Standards

For decades, calcium hydroxide–based materials played a central role in endodontics due to their antimicrobial properties and biological compatibility. However, advances in biomechanical preparation, three-dimensional obturation, and material science have redefined the requirements of an ideal endodontic sealer.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

Today, substantial evidence demonstrates that calcium hydroxide as a long-term endodontic sealer no longer satisfies modern biomechanical and clinical expectations, particularly regarding sealing ability, stability, and long-term outcomes.

Advertisement

✅ Calcium Hydroxide Sealers: Historical Perspective
Calcium hydroxide sealers were originally adopted because of their:

▪️ High alkalinity, promoting antibacterial effects
▪️ Ability to stimulate hard tissue formation
▪️ Relative ease of handling

Despite these advantages, their use as permanent sealers has increasingly been questioned as treatment goals shifted toward predictable, long-term apical sealing and structural integrity.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Calcium hydroxide has been one of the most widely used biomaterials in pediatric dentistry for several decades. Its biological properties, high alkalinity, and ability to stimulate hard tissue formation have made it a cornerstone in pulp therapy procedures.

✅ Why Calcium Hydroxide Fails Modern Biomechanical Standards
Modern endodontics demands materials that maintain dimensional stability, resist dissolution, and provide a fluid-tight seal under functional stresses. Evidence shows that calcium hydroxide sealers exhibit:

▪️ High solubility over time, leading to leakage
▪️ Poor adhesion to dentin and gutta-percha
▪️ Inability to support monoblock concepts
▪️ Reduced performance in warm vertical compaction techniques

These deficiencies directly compromise the biomechanical integrity of the root canal system.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

✅ Sealing Ability and Microleakage
Multiple in vitro and clinical studies confirm that calcium hydroxide sealers demonstrate inferior sealing ability compared with epoxy resin–based and bioceramic sealers. Progressive dissolution allows bacterial penetration, undermining long-term endodontic success.
Importantly, antibacterial activity does not compensate for inadequate sealing, as persistent microleakage remains the primary cause of post-treatment disease.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

✅ Comparison with Modern Endodontic Sealers
Contemporary sealers—such as epoxy resin, calcium silicate–based (bioceramic), and MTA-derived materials—offer:

▪️ Low solubility
▪️ Superior dentinal adaptation
▪️ Chemical bonding or bioactivity
▪️ Compatibility with modern obturation techniques

These properties align with current biomechanical and biological principles of root canal therapy.

📊 Comparative Table: Calcium Hydroxide Sealers vs Modern Endodontic Sealers

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Antibacterial activity	High initial pH with antimicrobial effect	Effect decreases over time and does not prevent leakage
Sealing ability	Easy placement in the canal	Inferior apical and coronal seal compared to resin and bioceramic sealers
Solubility	Gradual release of calcium ions	High long-term solubility leading to voids and microleakage
Biomechanical compatibility	Biocompatible with periapical tissues	Fails to reinforce root structure or support monoblock obturation

💬 Discussion
While calcium hydroxide remains valuable as an intracanal medicament, its role as a definitive endodontic sealer is scientifically outdated. Current evidence underscores that long-term success depends more on durable sealing and biomechanical stability than on transient antimicrobial effects. The persistence of calcium hydroxide sealers in some clinical settings reflects habit rather than evidence-based practice.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence ... The combination of calcium hydroxide and iodoform paste has become a cornerstone in pediatric endodontics, especially in the pulpectomy of primary teeth.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Avoid the use of calcium hydroxide–based sealers as permanent obturation materials
▪️ Prefer epoxy resin or bioceramic sealers for long-term sealing
▪️ Reserve calcium hydroxide for short-term intracanal medication
▪️ Align material selection with modern obturation techniques and biomechanical principles
▪️ Update clinical protocols according to current endodontic evidence

✍️ Conclusion
Calcium hydroxide as a long-term endodontic sealer no longer meets modern biomechanical standards due to its high solubility, inadequate sealing ability, and incompatibility with contemporary obturation concepts. Advances in material science have produced superior alternatives that ensure predictable, durable, and biologically sound outcomes, making the routine use of calcium hydroxide sealers as definitive materials unjustifiable in modern endodontic practice.

📚 References

✔ Ørstavik, D., Kerekes, K., & Eriksen, H. M. (2001). The quality of root canal fillings and the incidence of apical periodontitis. International Endodontic Journal, 34(7), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00415.x
✔ Siqueira, J. F., & Rôças, I. N. (2008). Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. Journal of Endodontics, 34(11), 1291–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028
✔ Viapiana, R., Guerreiro-Tanomaru, J. M., Tanomaru-Filho, M., Camilleri, J. (2014). Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers. International Endodontic Journal, 47(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12154
✔ Zhang, W., Li, Z., & Peng, B. (2009). Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 107(6), e79–e82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.024

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pulp Polyps in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options in Pediatric Dentistry
► Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence
► Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical Applications and Therapeutic Benefits

Why Pulp Therapy Fails: Risk Factors, Clinical Errors, and Evidence-Based Solutions

Pulp therapy is a cornerstone of both pediatric and adult restorative dentistry. However, despite advances in materials and techniques, treatment failure remains a relevant clinical challenge.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... The use of bioactive materials, accurate diagnosis, and periodic follow-up are essential to maintain oral health and prevent premature tooth loss in pediatric patients.

Understanding why pulp therapy fails is essential to improve prognosis, reduce retreatment, and preserve tooth structure. This article reviews the main biological, technical, and restorative factors associated with failure and presents evidence-based solutions supported by current literature.

Advertisement

✅ Biological Risk Factors for Pulp Therapy Failure
Biological factors often determine the baseline prognosis before treatment begins.Key contributors include:

▪️ Incorrect pulp diagnosis (reversible vs. irreversible pulpitis)
▪️ Advanced bacterial contamination
▪️ Undetected pulpal necrosis
▪️ Compromised immune response

Accurate case selection is one of the most critical determinants of pulp therapy success.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

✅ Clinical and Technical Errors
Many failures are directly related to operator-dependent factors.
Common errors include:

▪️ Inadequate isolation, leading to salivary and bacterial contamination
▪️ Incomplete caries removal, leaving infected dentin
▪️ Over-instrumentation or pulp tissue trauma
▪️ Improper placement of pulp capping or pulpotomy materials

Studies consistently show that lack of rubber dam isolation significantly increases failure rates.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Antibiotics Contraindicated During Pregnancy: Risks and Safer Alternatives in Dental Practice ... In dental practice, infections may require systemic antibiotic therapy; however, not all antibiotics are safe during pregnancy.

✅ Material-Related Factors
The choice and handling of materials play a decisive role.
Frequent issues include:

▪️ Incorrect manipulation of calcium-based materials
▪️ Use of outdated or low-biocompatibility agents
▪️ Poor sealing ability of restorative materials

Modern bioactive materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium silicate cements demonstrate superior outcomes due to their biocompatibility, sealing ability, and bioinductive properties.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... Understanding their clinical presentation, etiology, and management in both adults and children is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

✅ Restorative and Post-Treatment Factors
Even a technically correct pulp therapy can fail if the final restoration is inadequate.
Critical aspects:

▪️ Coronal microleakage
▪️ Delayed placement of definitive restoration
▪️ Poor marginal adaptation
▪️ Occlusal overload

A hermetic coronal seal is as important as the pulpal procedure itself.

📊 Comparative Table: Factors Influencing Pulp Therapy Outcomes

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Accurate Pulp Diagnosis	Improves case selection and prognosis	Requires clinical experience and diagnostic tools
Use of Bioactive Materials	Promotes dentin bridge formation and healing	Higher cost and technique sensitivity
Rubber Dam Isolation	Reduces bacterial contamination	May be challenging in uncooperative patients
Definitive Coronal Seal	Prevents microleakage and reinfection	Failure if restoration is delayed or poorly adapted

💬 Discussion
Current evidence confirms that pulp therapy failure is rarely due to a single factor. Instead, it is the result of an interaction between biological status, clinical technique, material selection, and restorative quality. Advances in bioactive materials have improved success rates, but they cannot compensate for poor diagnosis or inadequate isolation. Long-term success depends on strict adherence to evidence-based protocols.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Apexogenesis: Step by step procedure ... Apexogenesis is performed on immature teeth with open apices that are affected by caries, trauma, or fractures with pulp exposure. Follow-up and clinical controls are recommended.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Perform thorough pulp vitality and radiographic assessment
▪️ Always use rubber dam isolation
▪️ Select bioactive materials with proven clinical evidence
▪️ Ensure immediate and well-sealed definitive restorations
▪️ Schedule follow-up evaluations to detect early signs of failure

✍️ Conclusion
Pulp therapy fails primarily due to diagnostic errors, inadequate isolation, material misuse, and poor coronal sealing. When evidence-based principles are respected, pulp therapy remains a highly predictable and conservative treatment option. Continuous education and protocol standardization are key to improving clinical outcomes.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry, 384–392.
✔ Aguilar, P., & Linsuwanont, P. (2011). Vital pulp therapy in vital permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp: A systematic review. Journal of Endodontics, 37(5), 581–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.004
✔ Bogen, G., Kim, J. S., & Bakland, L. K. (2008). Direct pulp capping with mineral trioxide aggregate: An observational study. Journal of the American Dental Association, 139(3), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0150
✔ Hilton, T. J. (2009). Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: A review of the literature. Operative Dentistry, 34(5), 615–625.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Complete Guide to Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth: Materials, Techniques, and Success Rates
► Pulp Capping in Dentistry: How the Dental Pulp Is Protected (Updated Clinical Guide)
► CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol