Managing Dental Fear in Children: Emerging Psychological and Digital Approaches

Dental fear and anxiety in children remain significant barriers to effective oral healthcare. Traditional behavior management techniques, while effective, may be insufficient for certain pediatric patients.

📌 Recommended Article :

Webinar 🔽 Webinar: Behavior management in pediatric dentistry - Dr. Eyal Simchi ... Managing the behavior of the pediatric patient is a challenge for the pediatric dentist, since attending the office generates stress and uncertainty, causing some type of behavioral response.

Recent advances in psychological interventions and digital technologies have expanded the therapeutic toolkit available to pediatric dentists. This article reviews current evidence on emerging psychological and digital strategies for managing dental fear in children, emphasizing clinical applicability and patient-centered care.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Dental fear in children is a multifactorial condition influenced by age, temperament, previous medical experiences, parental anxiety, and sociocultural factors. If not properly managed, fear can lead to treatment avoidance, poor oral health outcomes, and long-term dental anxiety into adulthood. Modern pediatric dentistry increasingly integrates non-pharmacological approaches that prioritize emotional regulation, cognitive engagement, and technological support to enhance cooperation and reduce stress during dental visits.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Diclofenac, Ibuprofen, or Acetaminophen - Which Analgesic Should Be Used in Dentistry? ... Pain management is a fundamental component of dental practice. Among the most commonly prescribed analgesics are diclofenac, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen.

✅ Psychological Techniques for Managing Dental Fear

➤ Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-based strategies focus on identifying negative thoughts and replacing them with adaptive coping mechanisms. Techniques such as positive reinforcement, modeling, and guided imagery have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing anticipatory anxiety in pediatric dental patients.

➤ Tell-Show-Do and Enhanced Communication
The traditional Tell-Show-Do technique, when combined with age-appropriate language and emotional validation, remains a cornerstone of pediatric behavior management. Recent adaptations emphasize empathy, shared decision-making, and gradual exposure to dental procedures.

➤ Parental Involvement and Emotional Coaching
Parental behavior significantly influences a child’s emotional response to dental treatment. Emotion coaching strategies, where parents model calm behavior and reinforce coping skills, contribute to improved child cooperation and reduced fear.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Managing Dental Anxiety in Children: Techniques for Clinicians ... Dental anxiety in children remains a common barrier to successful treatment outcomes. It is characterized by excessive fear and avoidance behaviors that can compromise oral health.

✅ Digital Innovations in Pediatric Dental Anxiety Management

➤ Virtual Reality and Immersive Distraction
Virtual reality (VR) systems provide immersive audiovisual environments that divert attention away from dental stimuli. Clinical studies report significant reductions in perceived pain and anxiety during restorative and preventive procedures in children using VR distraction.

➤ Mobile Applications and Gamification
Interactive mobile health applications designed for pediatric dentistry use gamification, storytelling, and rewards to familiarize children with dental procedures. These tools enhance pre-visit preparation and improve treatment acceptance.

➤ Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Care
Emerging AI-driven behavioral assessment tools can help identify anxiety patterns and predict behavioral responses, allowing clinicians to tailor behavior management strategies to individual pediatric patients.

💬 Discussion
The integration of psychological and digital techniques represents a paradigm shift in pediatric dental anxiety management. While traditional methods remain effective, combining them with technology-enhanced interventions improves adaptability and patient engagement. However, accessibility, cost, and clinician training remain challenges that must be addressed before widespread implementation.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Non-Opioid Pain Management in Dentistry: ADA Recommendations ... Effective pain management in dentistry increasingly focuses on non-opioid medications, reflecting the ADA’s strong recommendation that NSAIDs and acetaminophen are the first-line therapy for acute dental pain.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Incorporate psychological behavior management techniques as first-line interventions.
▪️ Use digital tools, such as VR or mobile applications, selectively based on the child’s age and anxiety level.
▪️ Educate parents on their role in reducing dental fear.
▪️ Ensure ethical use of digital technologies, prioritizing patient comfort and safety.

✍️ Conclusion
Managing dental fear in children requires a comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach. The combination of psychological techniques and digital innovations offers promising opportunities to improve cooperation, reduce anxiety, and foster positive dental experiences. Continued research and clinical training are essential to optimize these strategies in pediatric dental practice.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. Pediatric Dentistry, 45(6), 292–310.
✔ Cianetti, S., Lombardo, G., Lupatelli, E., Rossi, G., Abraha, I., Pagano, S., & De Giorgio, R. (2017). Dental fear/anxiety among children and adolescents. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 18(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.02.07
✔ Gupta, A., Scott, K., & Dukewich, M. (2017). Innovative technology using virtual reality in pediatric dentistry. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, 41(2), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-41.2.124
✔ Klingberg, G., & Broberg, A. G. (2007). Dental fear/anxiety and dental behaviour management problems in children and adolescents. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 17(6), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00872.x
✔ Tanja-Dijkstra, K., et al. (2014). Can virtual reality reduce dental anxiety? PLoS ONE, 9(10), e109676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109676

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pharmacological Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: Drugs, Dosage, and Clinical Safety
► Pharmacological Management According to Post-Extraction Complications
► Dental pain in pediatric dentistry - Assessment tools

Mucocele vs. Ranula: Clinical Differences, Etiology, and Management

Mucocele and ranula are common benign lesions of the salivary glands that frequently present in dental and oral medicine practice. Although both result from salivary mucus extravasation or retention, they differ in anatomical location, clinical behavior, and therapeutic approach.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Oral Mucocele in Pediatric Patients: Clinical Features and Surgical Management ... Mucoceles are mucous-filled cystic lesions primarily resulting from trauma to minor salivary glands. They commonly appear in children and adolescents, particularly on the lower lip.

Accurate differentiation is essential to ensure proper diagnosis, treatment planning, and recurrence prevention.

Advertisement

✅ Definition and Clinical Characteristics

➤ Mucocele
A mucocele is a mucus-filled cystic lesion arising from minor salivary glands, typically due to mechanical trauma causing ductal rupture.

Key clinical features:
▪️ Soft, fluctuant, dome-shaped swelling
▪️ Bluish or translucent appearance
▪️ Commonly located on the lower lip, buccal mucosa, or ventral tongue
▪️ Usually painless and variable in size

➤ Ranula
A ranula is a larger mucous lesion originating from the sublingual gland, located in the floor of the mouth. It represents a specific type of mucocele with deeper anatomical involvement.

Key clinical features:
▪️ Unilateral, bluish swelling in the floor of the mouth
▪️ May elevate the tongue or interfere with speech and swallowing
▪️ Can extend into the neck (plunging ranula)

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Blandin–Nuhn Mucocele: Etiology, Clinical Features, and Effective Management ... These lesions represent a subtype of oral mucoceles and are caused by extravasation of mucus following trauma or ductal disruption.

✅ Etiology and Pathogenesis
Both lesions develop due to salivary flow disruption, but their mechanisms differ:

▪️ Mucocele: Most commonly caused by trauma or lip biting, leading to mucus extravasation into surrounding connective tissue.
▪️ Ranula: Typically results from ductal obstruction or rupture of the sublingual gland, with mucus accumulation in deeper anatomical planes.
The absence of an epithelial lining in most cases classifies them as pseudocysts.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Recurrent Oral Ulcers in Children: Etiology and Management (Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis) ... Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is the most common cause of recurrent oral ulcers in children, characterized by painful ulcerations affecting oral mucosa without systemic disease.

✅ Diagnosis
Diagnosis is primarily clinical, supported by imaging when necessary.

▪️ Mucocele: Clinical examination is usually sufficient.
▪️ Ranula: Ultrasound, CT, or MRI may be required to determine lesion extension, especially in suspected plunging ranula.
Histopathological analysis confirms diagnosis and excludes salivary gland neoplasms.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Mouth Sores or Canker Sores? How to Tell the Difference and Heal Faster ... Mouth sores are common lesions that can appear on the oral mucosa and often cause discomfort when eating, speaking, or brushing. Among these, canker sores (aphthous ulcers) are the most frequent.

✅ Treatment Options

Mucocele
▪️ Surgical excision of the lesion and associated minor salivary glands
▪️ Marsupialization in selected cases
▪️ Low recurrence when excision is complete

Ranula
▪️ Surgical removal of the sublingual gland is considered the gold standard
▪️ Simple drainage alone is associated with high recurrence rates
▪️ Plunging ranulas require combined intraoral and cervical approaches

📊 Comparative Table: Mucocele vs. Ranula – Key Clinical Differences

Clinical Feature	Mucocele	Ranula
Primary gland involved	Minor salivary glands	Sublingual gland
Common location	Lower lip and buccal mucosa	Floor of the mouth
Size	Small to moderate	Often large
Risk of recurrence	Low after proper excision	High if sublingual gland is not removed
Potential complications	Minimal	Airway or swallowing interference

💬 Discussion
Although mucocele and ranula share similar histopathological characteristics, their clinical behavior and management differ significantly. Ranulas require more aggressive treatment due to deeper glandular involvement and higher recurrence rates. Misdiagnosis or incomplete treatment may lead to repeated lesions and functional impairment.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Congenital Syphilis: Dental Manifestations – Hutchinson Incisors and Mulberry Molars ... Among the most characteristic features are Hutchinson incisors and mulberry (Moon) molars, which reflect systemic disruption during tooth development caused by Treponema pallidum infection.

🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Perform thorough clinical examination and imaging when indicated
▪️ Avoid simple drainage as definitive treatment for ranula
▪️ Submit all excised lesions for histopathological analysis
▪️ Educate patients on trauma-related risk factors

✍️ Conclusion
Mucocele and ranula are distinct salivary gland disorders that require accurate diagnosis and tailored management. Understanding their anatomical origin, clinical presentation, and evidence-based treatment options allows clinicians to reduce recurrence and optimize patient outcomes.

📚 References

✔ Neville, B. W., Damm, D. D., Allen, C. M., & Chi, A. C. (2016). Oral and maxillofacial pathology (4th ed.). Elsevier.
✔ Zhao, Y. F., Jia, Y., Chen, X. M., & Zhang, W. F. (2004). Clinical review of 580 ranulas. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 98(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.03.006
✔ Baurmash, H. D. (2003). Mucocele and ranula. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 61(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50074

📌 More Recommended Items

► What Are the Oral Manifestations in Oncology Patients? : Early and Advanced Manifestations
► What Are Fordyce Granules? Should You Be Concerned About Contagion?
► Traumatic White Lesions in the Pediatric Oral Cavity: Diagnosis, Prevention and Evidence-Based Treatment

Things You Should Know Before and After Third Molar Extraction

Third molar extraction, commonly known as wisdom tooth removal, is a frequent oral surgical procedure. Although often routine, it involves biological processes that patients should understand to reduce complications and improve healing.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 How to Prevent Dry Socket After Tooth Extraction: Signs, Prevention, and Treatment Guide ... Preventing dry socket is a key responsibility shared by both dental professionals and patients, involving proper surgical technique, patient education, and targeted pharmacological management.

Knowing what to expect before and after the extraction allows better decision-making and safer recovery.

Advertisement

✅ Why Third Molars Often Need Extraction
Third molars usually erupt between 17 and 25 years of age. Due to limited jaw space, they may remain impacted, partially erupted, or misaligned, increasing the risk of:

▪️ Pericoronitis (infection of surrounding gum tissue)
▪️ Dental caries in adjacent teeth
▪️ Periodontal disease
▪️ Cyst or tumor formation
▪️ Chronic pain or jaw discomfort
Early evaluation helps prevent these complications.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Wisdom Tooth Infection (Pericoronitis): Causes, Symptoms, and Evidence-Based Treatment ... The most frequent cause of infection is partial eruption of the third molar, which creates a gingival flap (operculum) that traps plaque and debris.

✅ Key Factors to Consider Before the Procedure

1. Position and Impaction Level
Wisdom teeth may be fully erupted, partially erupted, or completely impacted in bone. Deeper impaction increases surgical complexity, healing time, and postoperative discomfort.

2. Age of the Patient
Younger patients usually experience faster healing and fewer complications, as bone is less dense and roots are not fully developed.

3. Radiographic Evaluation
Panoramic radiographs or CBCT scans help assess root anatomy, nerve proximity, and surgical risk, especially in lower third molars near the inferior alveolar nerve.

4. Systemic Health
Conditions such as diabetes, smoking habits, or immune disorders can delay healing and increase infection risk, requiring tailored surgical planning.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bleeding After a Tooth Extraction: How to Stop It Safely ... Bleeding after a dental extraction is common and usually normal, especially during the first hours. However, knowing what is normal, how to control bleeding, and when to seek help is essential for proper healing.

✅ What to Expect After Third Molar Extraction
Postoperative symptoms are usually temporary and part of normal healing:

▪️ Swelling (peaks at 48–72 hours)
▪️ Mild to moderate pain
▪️ Limited mouth opening (trismus)
▪️ Minor bleeding during first 24 hours
Proper postoperative care significantly reduces discomfort and complications.

📊 Comparative Table: Postoperative Care After Third Molar Extraction

Care Measure	Purpose	Important Notes
Cold compress (first 24–48 h)	Reduces swelling and inflammation	Apply intermittently, not directly on skin
Soft diet	Prevents trauma to surgical site	Avoid hard, hot, or spicy foods
Oral hygiene with caution	Prevents infection	Do not rinse forcefully during first 24 h
Avoid smoking	Protects blood clot formation	Smoking increases dry socket risk
Prescribed medication	Controls pain and inflammation	Follow dosage exactly as indicated

✅ Common Complications and How to Prevent Them

Dry Socket (Alveolar Osteitis)
Occurs when the blood clot is lost prematurely.
▪️ More common in smokers and difficult extractions
▪️ Prevented by avoiding suction, smoking, and aggressive rinsing

Infection
Signs include increasing pain, swelling, or fever.
▪️ Proper hygiene and medication adherence are essential

📌 Recommended Article :

PDF 🔽 Manual of extraction techniques in pediatric dentistry - Step by step ... Tooth extraction is a routine treatment in the pediatric dentist's office. This procedure is performed when the tooth presents a deep caries and impossible reconstruction, fracture due to trauma, eruptive problems.

💬 Discussion
Third molar extraction is safe when proper diagnosis, surgical technique, and patient cooperation are present. Most complications arise from poor postoperative care or delayed intervention. Clear patient education significantly improves outcomes and satisfaction.

🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Follow all postoperative instructions strictly
▪️ Maintain gentle oral hygiene
▪️ Attend follow-up appointments
▪️ Seek professional care if pain worsens after day 3

✍️ Conclusion
Third molar extraction is a predictable and effective procedure when managed correctly. Understanding the process and applying appropriate postoperative care minimizes complications and ensures safe, comfortable healing.

📚 References

✔ Bui, C. H., Seldin, E. B., & Dodson, T. B. (2003). Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 61(12), 1379–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.001
✔ Renton, T., & Yilmaz, Z. (2012). Profiling of patients presenting with post-surgical neuropathy of the trigeminal nerve. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 70(11), 2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.195
✔ American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. (2016). Management of third molar teeth. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 74(12), 2222–2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.08.004

📌 More Recommended Items

► Surgical Techniques for Third Molar Extraction: Definitions, Indications, and Clinical Advantages
► Dental Abscess, Fistula, Cellulitis, and Ludwig's Angina: Differences, Symptoms & Treatment
► Risk Factors, Signs & Modern Management of Tongue Cancer: 2025 Review

Vital vs. Non-Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Dentistry: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Guide

Pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry aims to preserve the function and integrity of primary and young permanent teeth affected by caries or trauma. The selection between vital pulp therapies and non-vital pulp therapies depends on accurate diagnosis, pulp status, root development, and the strategic importance of the tooth.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... Understanding their clinical presentation, etiology, and management in both adults and children is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

Understanding these therapeutic approaches is essential for achieving long-term success while maintaining normal occlusal development and oral health.

Advertisement

✅ Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Dentistry
Vital pulp therapy (VPT) is indicated when the pulp remains partially or fully vital and capable of healing.

Common Vital Pulp Procedures
▪️ Indirect pulp treatment (IPT)
▪️ Direct pulp capping
▪️ Pulpotomy

Clinical Indications
▪️ Reversible pulp inflammation
▪️ Absence of spontaneous pain
▪️ No radiographic signs of periapical or furcal pathology

Advantages
▪️ Preserves pulp vitality and proprioception
▪️ Promotes continued root development
▪️ Minimally invasive and biologically conservative

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

✅ Non-Vital Pulp Therapies in Pediatric Dentistry
Non-vital pulp therapy is indicated when the pulp is irreversibly inflamed or necrotic.

Common Non-Vital Procedures
▪️ Pulpectomy in primary teeth
▪️ Root canal treatment in permanent teeth

Clinical Indications
▪️ Irreversible pulpitis
▪️ Pulp necrosis
▪️ Presence of fistula, abscess, or pathological mobility

Advantages
▪️ Eliminates infection
▪️ Maintains arch length
▪️ Prevents premature tooth loss

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... Its biological properties, high alkalinity, and ability to stimulate hard tissue formation have made it a cornerstone in pulp therapy procedures.

✅ Key Differences Between Vital and Non-Vital Pulp Therapies
The fundamental distinction lies in the biological status of the pulp and the therapeutic objective—preservation versus removal.

▪️ Vital therapies aim to maintain pulp health and physiological function
▪️ Non-vital therapies aim to control infection and prevent systemic spread

📊 Comparative Table: Pulp Therapy in Primary vs. Permanent Dentition

Clinical Aspect	Primary Dentition	Permanent Dentition
Main Therapeutic Goal	Maintain tooth until natural exfoliation	Preserve tooth for lifelong function
Pulpotomy Indication	Commonly indicated in vital pulp exposures	Limited to immature permanent teeth
Pulpectomy Considerations	Requires resorbable filling materials	Uses permanent obturation materials
Root Anatomy	Complex, thin, and physiologically resorbing	Stable anatomy without resorption
Impact on Success Rate	Highly dependent on diagnosis and case selection	Higher predictability with standardized protocols

💬 Discussion
Current evidence supports conservative pulp management whenever possible, particularly in primary teeth. Advances in bioactive materials such as MTA and calcium silicate-based cements have improved the success rates of vital pulp therapies. However, delayed diagnosis or inadequate case selection can compromise outcomes, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive clinical and radiographic assessment.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) has gained significant attention in pediatric endodontics, particularly in the management of necrotic primary teeth and immature permanent teeth.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Prioritize pulp vitality whenever diagnostic criteria allow
▪️ Use rubber dam isolation in all pulp therapy procedures
▪️ Select biocompatible, evidence-based materials
▪️ Schedule periodic clinical and radiographic follow-up

✍️ Conclusion
Vital and non-vital pulp therapies are complementary strategies in pediatric dentistry, each with clearly defined indications. Proper diagnosis, understanding of dentition-specific anatomy, and adherence to evidence-based protocols are essential to ensure long-term clinical success and optimal oral development in pediatric patients.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry, 405–414.
✔ Coll, J. A., Seale, N. S., Vargas, K., Marghalani, A. A., Al Shamali, S., & Graham, L. (2017). Primary tooth vital pulp therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(1), 16–123.
✔ Dhar, V., Marghalani, A. A., Crystal, Y. O., Kumar, A., Ritwik, P., Tulunoglu, O., & Graham, L. (2017). Use of vital pulp therapies in primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(5), 146–159.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Pain Management in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Best Anesthetics and Clinical Techniques
► Webinar: Vital Pulp Therapy: A Conservative Alternative in the Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions
► Pulp Therapy in Pediatric Dentistry: Complete and Updated Guide

Controversial Materials in Pediatric Dentistry: What Remains Safe Today?

In pediatric dentistry, the selection of restorative and pulpal materials must balance biocompatibility, effectiveness, and safety. Historical materials such as formocresol and dental amalgam have been debated for potential toxicity, while modern alternatives like bioactive cements (e.g., MTA, Biodentine) and adhesive restorative materials are widely accepted.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

This review synthesizes evidence on controversial dental materials and their current clinical safety status in pediatric care, providing evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Dentistry for children and adolescents involves unique biological and behavioral considerations, requiring materials that are safe, effective, and minimally invasive. Materials that were historically part of pediatric practice now face scrutiny due to evolving evidence around toxicity, biocompatibility, and environmental impact. Clinicians must understand both contested and recommended materials to optimize pediatric patient outcomes.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

✅ Controversial Dental Materials in Pediatric Practice

Formocresol
Formocresol has been used as a pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth due to its bactericidal and devitalizing properties. However, concerns about formaldehyde, a hazardous compound classified as potentially carcinogenic, have led to reevaluation of its routine use in children. Evidence suggests that under low exposure conditions, formaldehyde metabolism may not pose significant carcinogenic risk, yet modern practice favors biocompatible alternatives.

Dental Amalgam
Dental amalgam, an alloy containing mercury, remains controversial due to its mercury content and perceptions of toxicity. Although organizations such as the ADA and FDA acknowledge amalgam’s longstanding safety record, its use in pediatric patients has declined, with emphasis shifting toward resin-based and glass ionomer materials in many programs due to aesthetic and minimally invasive preferences.

Bisphenol A (BPA) Derivatives
Resin-based composites and sealants may contain BPA derivatives, raising concerns about endocrine-disrupting potential. Available evidence highlights transient BPA release after placement, but the clinical benefits of resin-based materials generally outweigh potential exposure when proper techniques are followed.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives ... Newer agents such as bioceramic putties continue to expand treatment possibilities. Understanding the clinical performance and limitations of each material is essential for evidence-based decision-making in pulpotomies.

✅ Current Safe and Recommended Materials

Bioactive Cements and Vital Pulp Therapy Agents
Materials such as mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine have demonstrated favorable outcomes in vital pulp therapy, promoting dentinogenesis and exhibiting high biocompatibility. These materials represent contemporary choices for maintaining pulp vitality in primary dentition.

Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Restoratives
Glass ionomer cements offer chemical adhesion and fluoride release, aligning with minimally invasive principles, though moisture sensitivity can limit performance. Resin composites provide improved aesthetics and adaptability, yet require optimal isolation for long-term success.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons ... Pulpotec® is a radiopaque, non‑resorbable medicament widely used for pulpotomy/pulpitis treatment in vital primary and immature permanent molars, as well as for emergency root canal dressings.

💬 Discussion
The transition away from controversial materials like formocresol and amalgam reflects a broader trend toward biocompatible and patient-centered care. While historical evidence attests to the effectiveness of certain legacy materials, modern pediatric dentistry prioritizes bioactivity, regenerative potential, and minimization of systemic exposure. Adoption of contemporary materials should be contextualized within evidence-based protocols and comprehensive risk assessment.

🎯 Clinical Recommendations
▪️ Use bioactive cements (MTA/Biodentine) for vital pulp therapy when indicated.
▪️ Prefer glass ionomer or resin-based restoratives in primary dentition, considering isolation quality and caries risk.
▪️ Avoid routine use of formocresol in pulpotomy unless alternatives are unavailable and benefits outweigh theoretical risks.
▪️ Reserve amalgam for limited situations where other materials are contraindicated, recognizing regulatory and educational trends.

✍️ Conclusion
Controversies surrounding materials in pediatric dentistry have prompted shifts toward safer, more biologically favorable options. Clinicians must remain informed by current evidence when selecting materials for restorative and pulpal procedures. While some traditional materials may still be used judiciously, modern bioactive and adhesive materials represent the safest and most effective choices for pediatric patients today.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2025–2026). Pediatric restorative dentistry: Pediatric restorative dentistry reference manual. AAPD.
✔ Fuks, A. B. (2015). The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry: New insights and reappraising the tradition. Pediatric Dentistry, 37(2), 125–132.
✔ Milnes, A. R. (2006). Persuasive evidence that formocresol use in pediatric dentistry is safe. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association, 72(3), 247–248.
✔ Peker, O. (2024). Contemporary dental materials used in pediatric dentistry. Dental and Medical Journal, 6(2), 70–85.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Chemical Caries Removal: Drill-Free Technique, Materials, and Clinical Application
► Is Dental Amalgam Being Phased Out Worldwide?
► Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Updated Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence