Ver todoCapacitación

Medicina Bucal

Endodoncia

ÚLTIMAS NOTICIAS

martes, 25 de noviembre de 2025

Dental Fistula in Children: Causes, Diagnosis, and Evidence-Based Treatment

Dental Fistula

A dental fistula in children—also known as a parulis or gum boil—is a pathological drainage pathway that forms as a result of a chronic dental infection, usually originating from pulp necrosis due to deep caries or trauma.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Facial Cellulitis vs. Angioedema in Dental Emergencies: Key Differences, Severity, and Management ... Facial cellulitis and angioedema are two potentially life-threatening conditions frequently encountered in dental emergencies. Although both present with facial swelling, they differ significantly in etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment approach.
Although often painless, a fistula indicates the presence of an active infectious process that requires immediate dental intervention. Understanding its etiology, clinical presentation, and management is essential for effective pediatric care.

Advertisement

Etiology of Dental Fistula in Pediatric Patients
The most frequent causes include:

1. Deep Dental Caries
The primary cause is untreated dental caries that lead to irreversible pulpitis and ultimately pulp necrosis. This allows bacterial proliferation and abscess development, culminating in fistula formation.

2. Dental Trauma
Trauma—particularly in anterior teeth—may cause pulpal ischemia and necrosis, increasing the risk of chronic periapical infection.

3. Developmental Anomalies
Anomalies such as dens invaginatus or enamel defects increase susceptibility to pulp exposure and infection.

4. Failed Dental Treatments
Incomplete pulpotomies, pulpectomies, or restorations can predispose the tooth to persistent infection.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 What Are the Symptoms of a Dental Infection? ... Dental infections typically arise from untreated dental caries, periodontal disease, or trauma that allows bacteria to invade the pulp or surrounding tissues.
Clinical Characteristics
A pediatric dental fistula typically presents as:

▪️ A small, raised white or yellowish lesion on the gingiva or mucosa
▪️ Intermittent pus drainage
▪️ Minimal pain (because pressure is released)
▪️ A necrotic primary or permanent tooth
▪️ Radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency

The fistula itself is not the disease, but a symptom of the underlying infection.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Dental Abscesses in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Management in 2025 ... This article reviews evidence-based approaches (2025) for diagnosis, management, and prevention, highlighting the importance of early intervention to preserve oral and general health.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is primarily clinical, supported by:

➤ Radiographic Evaluation
▪️ Periapical radiograph or CBCT to identify periapical pathology
▪️ Tracing the fistulous tract with a gutta-percha cone
➤ Pulp Vitality Testing
Useful for permanent teeth; typically unreliable in primary teeth.
➤ Caries and Trauma Assessment
Determining the original source of infection is essential for treatment.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Preventing Dental Emergencies in Primary Dentition: Caries, Abscesses and Early Intervention ... This article examines preventive strategies to reduce dental emergencies in primary dentition, focusing on early childhood caries, dental abscesses, and the role of early intervention in maintaining oral health.
Evidence-Based Treatment of Dental Fistula in Children
The goal is not to treat the fistula itself, but to eliminate the source of infection.

1. Pulp Therapy or Root Canal Treatment
▪️ Primary teeth: pulpectomy using resorbable materials
▪️ Permanent teeth: conventional root canal therapy
This eliminates bacterial load and restores periapical health.

2. Extraction of Non-Restorable Teeth
Indicated when:

▪️ The tooth has severe destruction
▪️ There is pathological mobility
▪️ Infection persists despite treatment

3. Systemic Antibiotics
Antibiotics are not first-line treatment but may be used when:

▪️ Facial cellulitis is present
▪️ The child has systemic symptoms (fever, malaise)
▪️ The infection is rapidly progressing

➤ Common pediatric antibiotic doses:
▪️ Amoxicillin: 40–50 mg/kg/day divided every 8–12 h
▪️ Amoxicillin + Clavulanate: 40–45 mg/kg/day (based on amoxicillin component) every 12 h
▪️ Clindamycin (penicillin allergy): 10–20 mg/kg/day divided every 6–8 h

These are evidence-based pediatric doses, but clinicians must consider weight, severity, and guidelines.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Managing Pediatric Odontogenic Infections: Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Treatment Guidelines ... Odontogenic infections in children are frequent emergencies in pediatric dentistry. They arise from bacterial invasion of dental pulp and surrounding tissues, commonly due to untreated caries or trauma.
Prevention Strategies

▪️ Early and routine dental visits
▪️ Fluoride therapy for caries prevention
▪️ Restoration of early carious lesions
▪️ Traumatic injury prevention counseling
▪️ Sealants for high-risk occlusal surfaces

📊 Comparative Table: Management Approaches for Pediatric Dental Fistula

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Pulp Therapy (Pulpectomy) Preserves tooth structure; high success in primary teeth Requires child cooperation; not suitable for severely damaged teeth
Extraction Eliminates infection quickly; simple procedure May affect occlusion and arch space; requires space maintenance

💬 Discussion
A pediatric dental fistula is the result of a long-standing infectious process, most commonly linked to untreated caries, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and preventive dentistry. While fistulas may appear benign due to absence of pain, they reflect chronic periapical pathology that may compromise both primary and permanent dentition. Evidence indicates that definitive dental treatment, not antibiotics, is the most effective approach. When treated appropriately, prognosis is excellent and recurrence is rare.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Key Differences Between Pediatric and Adult Odontogenic Infections: Updated Clinical Guidelines ... This article outlines the major anatomical, clinical, and therapeutic distinctions between pediatric and adult odontogenic infections, highlighting the need for age-specific diagnosis and treatment approaches.
✍️ Conclusion
A dental fistula in children is a visible sign of an underlying infection requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. Elimination of the infectious source —whether through pulp therapy or extraction—is essential for complete healing. Preventive strategies remain key to avoiding severe complications and maintaining long-term pediatric oral health.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Evaluate any gingival lesion suspicious of a fistula with radiographs.
▪️ Treat the source of infection—not just the fistula.
▪️ Avoid unnecessary antibiotic use.
▪️ Emphasize prevention through caregiver education.
▪️ Monitor treated teeth until complete radiographic healing is confirmed.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2024). Guideline on antibiotic therapy for pediatric dental patients. AAPD Reference Manual. https://www.aapd.org
✔ Fuks, A. B., Papagiannoulis, L., & Duggal, M. S. (2021). Pulp therapy for primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 31(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12701
✔ Siqueira, J. F., & Rôças, I. N. (2023). The microbiology of apical periodontitis. Dental Clinics of North America, 67(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2022.08.001
✔ Robertson, A., & Andreasen, J. O. (2019). Traumatic dental injuries in children. Pediatric Dentistry, 41(3), 210–218.

📌 More Recommended Items

Surgical excision of mucocele with local anesthesia in an 8-month-old baby
Odontogenic facial cellulitis in a pediatric patient - Diagnosis, treatment and multidisciplinary management
Odontogenic infection in facial spaces - Pharmacological and surgical management in pediatric patients

Traumatic White Lesions in the Pediatric Oral Cavity: Diagnosis, Prevention and Evidence-Based Treatment

Traumatic White Lesions

Traumatic white lesions in the pediatric oral cavity are mucosal alterations caused by mechanical, thermal, or chemical trauma.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Aphthous Stomatitis vs Traumatic Ulcers: Clinical Differences, Symptoms, and Treatment Guidelines ... Despite their similar appearance, their etiology, pathophysiology, and management differ significantly. Accurate differentiation is essential for effective treatment and prevention of recurrence.
These lesions often present as white plaques, patches, or linear streaks resulting from epithelial damage and keratinization. Recognizing their etiology and distinguishing them from infectious, genetic, or premalignant disorders is essential for accurate pediatric dental management.

Advertisement

Introduction
White lesions in children may arise from physiological processes, benign injuries, or pathological conditions. Trauma-related white lesions are particularly common because children frequently bite, scrape, or irritate the oral mucosa during play, mastication, or parafunctional habits. Misdiagnosis may lead to unnecessary antimicrobial use or missed identification of systemic disease. This article presents an evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic approach focused specifically on traumatic etiologies.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis in Children: Differential Diagnosis and and Modern Management ... This article reviews its definition, etiology, clinical diagnosis, differential features, and evidence-based treatment approaches to guide pediatric dentists and clinicians in accurate management.
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

➤ Etiology of Traumatic White Lesions
Traumatic white lesions in children typically arise from:

▪️ Accidental cheek or lip biting
▪️ Frictional keratosis from orthodontic appliances or fractured teeth
▪️ Thermal burns from hot food or beverages
▪️ Chemical injuries, commonly from aspirin or acidic agents
▪️ Iatrogenic trauma (dental procedures, suction injuries)
▪️ Self-inflicted habits (nail biting, bruxism-related cheek trauma)

These insults cause epithelial hyperkeratosis, necrosis, or fibrin deposition, producing a white appearance.

➤ Key Diagnostic Features
Clinically, traumatic white lesions typically show:

▪️ Well-defined or irregular white patches, sometimes with erythematous borders
▪️ History of repeated trauma
▪️ Non-scrapable surface, distinguishing them from candidiasis
▪️ Rapid onset, often within hours
▪️ Pain or sensitivity, although frictional keratosis is often asymptomatic
▪️ Resolution in 7–14 days once the irritant is removed

Laboratory tests or biopsies are rarely required unless lesions persist or atypical features appear.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Early Diagnosis and Management of Childhood Cancer from the Pediatric Dentistry Consultation ... Early detection of childhood cancer in dental practice plays a critical role in improving survival rates and quality of life. Pediatric dentists are often the first professionals to observe oral manifestations that may indicate systemic malignancies.
Evidence-Based Treatment and Management

➤ First-line Management
▪️ Eliminate the source of trauma, such as sharp teeth, orthodontic appliances, or biting habits.
▪️ Advise soft diet and reduced irritants (acidic foods, strong spices).
▪️ Topical analgesics (benzocaine or lidocaine gel) for pain relief.
▪️ Barrier protectants, such as hyaluronic acid gels or Orabase.
▪️ Re-evaluation in 1–2 weeks to confirm healing.

➤ When to Consider Medications
▪️ Severe inflammation: short-term topical corticosteroids (e.g., 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide).
▪️ Secondary infection: antimicrobial mouth rinses (chlorhexidine 0.12%).
▪️ Persistent biting habits: behavioral therapy or orthodontic guards.

➤ When to Escalate
Lesions should be reassessed or referred if:
▪️ Persist beyond 3 weeks
▪️ Present with induration, ulceration, or unexplained bleeding
▪️ Mimic systemic pathologies (lichen planus, HSV, autoimmune disorders)

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Dental Management of Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease: Updated Clinical Guide for Dentists ... Dentists play a crucial role in early recognition, supportive management, and patient education. This article provides updated clinical guidelines for oral healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of HFMD.
Prevention Strategies
▪️ Proper smoothing of sharp dental edges
▪️ Protection during orthodontic treatment
▪️ Counseling caregivers about parafunctional habits
▪️ Avoidance of chemical irritants in the mouth
▪️ Guidance on safe temperature of food and drinks
▪️ Encourage wearing mouthguards during sports activities

📊 Comparative Table: Trauma-Induced vs Infectious White Lesions

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Trauma-Induced Lesions Clear history of injury; rapid healing once irritant removed May mimic other pathologies; recurrent in parafunctional habits
Infectious Lesions Responsive to targeted antimicrobial therapy; distinctive scrapable features Risk of misdiagnosis; may indicate systemic disease if recurrent

💬 Discussion
Traumatic white lesions are typically benign but can resemble more serious conditions. A careful history is the most critical diagnostic tool. Distinguishing traumatic keratosis from infectious or systemic etiologies prevents overtreatment with antifungals or unnecessary biopsies. Evidence supports environmental modification and habit correction as effective first-line management. Pediatric dentists must remain alert to lesions that deviate from typical healing patterns, as these may signal underlying systemic issues requiring medical evaluation.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Odontogenic Infections in Children: Updated Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention Guidelines (2025) ... This academic article presents an updated overview of their causes, clinical presentation, therapeutic approach, and prevention strategies, based on current evidence and international recommendations.
✍️ Conclusion
Traumatic white lesions in children are common, benign, and generally self-limiting. Through a structured diagnostic process, clinicians can differentiate them from infectious and systemic pathologies. Early identification, elimination of irritants, and follow-up are essential to successful management. Prevention strategies involving appliance adjustment, habit counseling, and environmental modifications significantly reduce recurrence.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Conduct a thorough history to identify traumatic etiology.
▪️ Prioritize removal of mechanical, chemical, or thermal irritants.
▪️ Use barrier and analgesic agents when needed.
▪️ Re-evaluate within 1–2 weeks to confirm resolution.
▪️ Refer if lesions persist beyond 3 weeks or show atypical features.
▪️ Educate caregivers and children to reduce risky habits and oral trauma.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2022). Policy on management of dental patients with oral lesions. AAPD Reference Manual. https://www.aapd.org
✔ Chiang, M. L., & Ng, S. K. (2021). Traumatic oral lesions in children: A clinical review. Pediatric Dentistry Journal, 31(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdj.2021.03.004
✔ Odell, E. W. (2020). Clinical problem solving in oral medicine. Elsevier.
✔ Regezi, J. A., Sciubba, J. J., & Jordan, R. C. (2022). Oral pathology: Clinical pathologic correlations (8th ed.). Elsevier.
✔ Villa, A., & Abati, S. (2019). Oral white lesions: An updated clinical diagnostic decision tree. Journal of Dentistry, 84, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.011

📌 More Recommended Items

How to Distinguish Aphthous Ulcers from Traumatic Lesions: Clinical Diagnosis and Management
Differential Diagnosis of Perioral Dermatitis: Clinical Insights and Management
Herpangina in Children: Causes, Symptoms, and Treatment of This Viral Infection

Antibiotics in Pediatric Dentistry: Safe Indications, Correct Dosing, and Common Prescribing Errors

Antibiotics

Antibiotic prescribing in children requires strict clinical criteria to prevent resistance, adverse effects, and therapeutic failure. This article provides updated guidance on indications, dosing, common mistakes, and safe alternatives in pediatric dental infections.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Analgesic and Antibiotic Recommendations in Pediatric Oral Surgery ... Pediatric oral surgery includes extractions, frenectomies, and management of odontogenic infections, which may lead to postoperative pain and inflammation. Selecting appropriate analgesic and antibiotic therapy is essential to ensure safety, comfort, and recovery while minimizing adverse reactions and resistance.
Introduction
Pediatric dental infections are primarily managed through local treatment, not antibiotics. Despite this, unnecessary prescriptions remain common. Understanding when antibiotics are essential and how to prescribe them safely and effectively is crucial for pediatric dentists.

Advertisement

Indications for Antibiotics in Pediatric Dentistry
Antibiotics are indicated only when an infection spreads beyond the tooth, shows systemic involvement, or cannot be controlled with local measures.

➤ Evidence-based indications
▪️ Facial swelling with extraoral cellulitis
▪️ Lymphadenitis associated with dental infection
▪️ Fever, malaise, or trismus indicating systemic spread
▪️ Acute dental abscess with spreading infection
▪️ Immunocompromised pediatric patients
▪️ Post-trauma infection when contamination is high

➤ Non-indications (Do NOT prescribe)
▪️ Localized pulpitis
▪️ Local dental abscess without systemic signs
▪️ Pain without infection
▪️ After routine extractions
▪️ Viral lesions (herpetic gingivostomatitis)

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Amoxicillin vs Clindamycin in Pediatric Dentistry: Updated Clinical Guide 2025 ... Choosing between amoxicillin and clindamycin in pediatric dentistry requires a clear understanding of their mechanisms of action, clinical indications, weight-based dosing formulas, and safety profiles.
Pediatric Dosage Recommendations (By Infection Type)

➤ First-line antibiotic: Amoxicillin
▪️ Dose: 20–40 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours
▪️ Indications: odontogenic cellulitis, abscess with systemic signs

➤ Severe infections or concern for resistance: Amoxicillin–Clavulanate
▪️ Dose: 25–45 mg/kg/day (amoxicillin component), divided every 12 hours
▪️ Indications: spreading cellulitis, failure of first-line therapy

➤ Penicillin allergy (non-anaphylactic): Cephalexin
▪️ Dose: 25–50 mg/kg/day divided every 6–12 hours
▪️ Indications: mild to moderate odontogenic infections

➤ Penicillin allergy (anaphylactic): Clindamycin
▪️ Dose: 10–25 mg/kg/day divided every 8 hours
▪️ Indications: severe infections, cellulitis, deep-space involvement

➤ Anaerobic dominance suspected: Metronidazole
▪️ Dose: 7.5 mg/kg every 8 hours
▪️ Always used in combination with amoxicillin

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Pediatric Dentistry: When and How to Use It Safely in 2025 ... Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric dentistry is a preventive measure used to avoid serious systemic infections, such as infective endocarditis, in children undergoing dental procedures.
Common Prescribing Errors in Pediatric Dentistry

➤ Overuse of antibiotics
One of the most recurrent issues. Local treatment (pulpotomy, drainage, extraction) is often sufficient.

➤ Incorrect dosing
Underdosing promotes resistance; overdosing increases toxicity. Weight-based calculation is essential.

➤ Wrong duration
For odontogenic infections: 5–7 days is typically enough; prolonged courses offer no benefit.

➤ Treating viral diseases with antibiotics
Herpetic gingivostomatitis or recurrent aphthae do not require antibiotics.

➤ Prescribing without drainage
Antibiotics do not replace surgical management.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Updated Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Dentistry: Evidence-Based Recommendations ... This article discusses updated, evidence-based guidelines for antibiotic use in pediatric dental care, focusing on clinical indications, dosage, and the importance of antimicrobial stewardship.
Safe Alternatives to Antibiotic Use

➤ Local interventions
▪️ Drainage
vPulp therapy
▪️ Extraction
▪️ Irrigation

➤ Analgesic management
▪️ Acetaminophen: 10–15 mg/kg/dose every 6 hours
▪️ Ibuprofen: 10 mg/kg every 6–8 hours

➤ Adjunctive measures
▪️ Warm compresses
▪️ Oral hygiene reinforcement
▪️ Monitoring within 24–48 hours

📊 Comparative Table: Safe Alternatives vs Antibiotic Therapy

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Local Treatment (Drainage, Pulp Therapy) Addresses the source of infection; avoids antibiotic exposure Requires cooperation and may not be feasible in severe cases
Systemic Antibiotics Useful when infection spreads or systemic signs are present Risk of resistance, adverse reactions, and misuse

💬 Discussion
The misuse of antibiotics in pediatric dentistry contributes to global antimicrobial resistance. Proper prescribing requires understanding infection pathways, pediatric physiology, and pharmacology. Local treatment remains the cornerstone of management, while antibiotics play a supportive role only when clinically necessary.

📌 Recommended Article :
PDF 🔽 Antibiotics in dental infections in children. Which one to use? ... We share a study that analyzes the characteristics and use of the most widely used antibiotics in pediatric dentistry during a dental infection.
✍️ Conclusion
Appropriate antibiotic use in pediatric dentistry demands strict adherence to indications, accurate weight-based dosing, and avoidance of unnecessary prescriptions. Implementing evidence-based practices ensures effective management while reducing risks of resistance and adverse effects.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Always confirm systemic involvement before prescribing.
▪️ Choose first-line agents based on current pediatric guidelines.
▪️ Calculate doses by body weight, not age.
▪️ Reassess within 48 hours for clinical improvement.
▪️ Educate parents on correct administration and adherence.

📚 References

✔ Brook, I. (2017). The role of antibiotics in pediatric dental infections. Pediatric Dentistry, 39(5), 325–331.
✔ Wright, J. T., Tampi, M. P., Graham, L., Estrich, C., et al. (2018). Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for antibiotic use in pediatric dental patients. Journal of the American Dental Association, 149(11), 906–921.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.08.020
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Use of antibiotic therapy for pediatric dental patients. AAPD Reference Manual.

📌 More Recommended Items

Pharmacologic management for pediatric dental patients
Guideline on use of antibiotic therapy for pediatric dental patients
Medications and Developing Teeth: Dental Risks, Mechanisms, and Prevention in Children

domingo, 23 de noviembre de 2025

Chewing Gum with Xylitol vs. Other Delivery Forms: Which Works Best to Prevent Dental Caries?

Xylitol-Dental Caries

This article evaluates the effectiveness of xylitol chewing gum compared with other xylitol delivery forms—including syrups, lozenges, and wipes—for preventing dental caries in children. Current evidence highlights differences in mechanism, compliance, and clinical outcomes.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: Dosage, Frequency, and Current Controversies ... Key aspects include topical vs. systemic fluoride, caries-preventive effectiveness, and a special update on recent FDA considerations (2025) related to systemic fluoride supplements.
Introduction
Xylitol is a well-established noncariogenic polyol with proven benefits in reducing Streptococcus mutans levels and caries incidence. Although chewing gum is the most widely studied delivery form, alternative methods such as xylitol syrup, lozenges, and oral wipes have expanded clinical use, especially in younger children who cannot chew gum. This article examines which delivery form offers the most effective caries-preventive benefit based on current scientific evidence.

Advertisement

Mechanism of Action Across Delivery Forms
All delivery forms rely on the same primary mechanism: inhibition of Streptococcus mutans metabolism, reduced bacterial adhesion, and promotion of salivary flow. Chewing gum, however, provides an additional benefit by stimulating saliva, which enhances buffering capacity and mechanical clearance.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Xylitol and Dental Caries Prevention in Children: Mechanism, Benefits, and Clinical Use ... This review explores its mechanism of action, clinical indications, dosage in pediatric populations, and how it compares with other caries-preventive agents such as fluoride and sorbitol.
Presentations
Below is a structured presentation of the main xylitol product formulations used in pediatric caries prevention. Each subsection summarizes evidence, practical advantages, and age-appropriate considerations.

➤ Xylitol Chewing Gum
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Multiple randomized trials and long-term studies show that xylitol chewing gum (used 3–5 times/day) reduces caries incidence in school-aged children.
▪️ Practical notes: Provides salivary stimulation and prolonged oral exposure; best suited for children able to safely chew gum (typically ≥5 years). Not recommended for toddlers due to choking risk and chewing ability.

➤ Xylitol Syrup
▪️ Evidence & rationale: RCTs in infants and toddlers demonstrate that xylitol syrup administered by caregivers (e.g., divided doses totaling ~8–10 g/day) reduces vertical transmission of S. mutans and lowers early childhood caries (ECC) incidence.
▪️ Practical notes: Ideal for children who cannot chew; dosing and caregiver compliance are critical.

➤ Xylitol Lozenges (or Pastilles)
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Lozenges prolong contact time in the oral cavity and have shown similar antimicrobial effects to gum when consistently used. Clinical effectiveness depends on adherence and correct use (slow dissolution).
▪️ Practical notes: Useful in settings where gum is restricted (e.g., schools) but require that children understand not to swallow or chew them prematurely.

➤ Xylitol Wipes and Topical Applications
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Primarily studied for their ability to reduce salivary/plaque levels of S. mutans in infants. Evidence for direct caries-preventive outcomes is limited but promising as an adjunct.
▪️ Practical notes: Best as part of a caregiver-administered routine for infants and very young children; not a standalone solution for high-risk cases.

➤ Combined or Programmatic Use (e.g., Maternal + Child Regimens)
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Studies combining maternal xylitol use with child interventions (e.g., syrup or wipes) show additive reductions in transmission and caries risk. Programmatic approaches used in public health initiatives often yield better population outcomes.
▪️ Practical notes: Consider combined strategies for high-risk populations; logistics and adherence must be planned.

📊 Comparative Table: Xylitol Delivery Forms for Caries Prevention

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Xylitol Chewing Gum Strong evidence; high salivary stimulation; convenient for older children Not suitable for toddlers; requires chewing ability; school restrictions
Xylitol Syrup Ideal for infants; well-studied; easy caregiver administration Higher sugar-like intake volume; requires multiple doses daily
Xylitol Lozenges Prolonged oral exposure; gum alternative for older children Dependent on compliance; choking risk for small children
Xylitol Wipes Useful for infants; reduces S. mutans transmission Less evidence for caries reduction; lower overall effectiveness

💬 Discussion
Among all delivery forms, xylitol chewing gum consistently demonstrates the strongest evidence for reducing dental caries in older children, largely due to its enhanced salivary stimulation and frequent dosing opportunities. Xylitol syrup, however, is the preferred form for toddlers and infants due to safety and ease of administration. Lozenges serve as a practical alternative for older children unable to chew gum during school hours, whereas wipes play a supportive role primarily in S. mutans reduction rather than direct caries prevention.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review ... This review explores its mechanism of action, clinical indications, advantages, and limitations compared to other fluoride therapies used in pediatric dentistry.
✍️ Conclusion
Chewing gum with xylitol remains the most effective delivery form for preventing dental caries in school-aged children, supported by robust clinical evidence. For younger age groups, xylitol syrup is the preferred option, while lozenges and wipes offer supplementary or situational benefits. The optimal delivery form should consider age, safety, compliance, and clinical goals.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Use xylitol chewing gum (3–5 daily exposures) for children ≥5 years.
▪️ Prefer xylitol syrup for infants and toddlers.
▪️ Use lozenges where gum is not permitted.
▪️ Use wipes as an adjunct to reduce S. mutans in infants.
▪️ Select products containing at least 1 g of xylitol per dose.

📚 References

✔ Dodds, M. W. J. (2015). Xylitol and oral health. Journal of Dental Education, 79(10), 1169–1172. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26438299/
✔ Honkala, S., & Honkala, E. (2017). Chewing gum and caries prevention in children. International Journal of Dentistry, 2017, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8365651
✔ Hujoel, P. P., Lingström, P., & Bader, J. D. (2017). The effects of xylitol on dental caries and oral flora. Journal of the American Dental Association, 148(6), 455–463.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.03.013
✔ Milgrom, P., Ly, K. A., Roberts, M. C., Rothen, M., Mueller, G., & Yamaguchi, D. K. (2006). Xylitol pediatric syrup for caries prevention: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(11), 1272–1276. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.11.1272
✔ Söderling, E. M. (2009). Xylitol, mutans streptococci, and dental plaque. Advances in Dental Research, 21(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895937409335620

📌 More Recommended Items

Fluoride Varnish for Preventing and Treating White Spot Lesions: Clinical Evidence and Best Practices
Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical Guide 2025
How to Apply: Clinpro Sealant - Step by step

sábado, 22 de noviembre de 2025

Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide

Pulpotomy - Pulpectomy

Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth is a cornerstone of pediatric dental treatment. Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Manual of diagnosis and pulp treatment in non-vital primary teeth ... Non-vital teeth are those whose nerves lack vitality and there is no blood flow inside. This may be due to deep caries or dental trauma that irreversibly affects the dental pulp.
Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

Advertisement

Background and Rationale
Primary teeth differ significantly from permanent teeth in morphology and physiology, notably in their root anatomy, resorption patterns, and innervation. Current pediatric dentistry guidelines (e.g., AAPD) describe pulpotomy as indicated when coronal pulp is inflamed but radicular pulp remains vital. Meanwhile, pulpectomy is generally reserved for cases with necrosis, irreversible pulpitis, or radiographic pathology.

📌 Recommended Article :
Video 🔽 Pulpectomy. Step-by-Step Procedure - Access, Preparation, and Obturation ... We share the step-by-step procedure of a pulpectomy performed with rotary files. In this video we can observe the opening, chemomechanical preparation and obturation.
Clinical Evidence: Success Rates & Comparative Outcomes

➤ Randomized & Controlled Trials
▪️ A multicenter RCT comparing cervical pulpotomy (with calcium-enriched mixture cement) versus pulpectomy (Metapex) in primary molars with irreversible pulpitis found no significant difference in clinical and radiographic success rates. PubMed
▪️ In a split-mouth randomized trial on primary incisors with vital pulp exposure, pulpotomy (formocresol) and pulpectomy (zinc-oxide-eugenol) showed similar 12-month success, with survival rates of ~82% vs ~74%, respectively (not statistically significant).

➤ Observational and Cohort Studies
A retrospective cohort study of 876 primary molars reported that iRoot BP Plus pulpotomy had a significantly better long-term prognosis (survival over 48 months) than Vitapex pulpectomy.
A survival analysis of pulpectomy under general anesthesia found that failures usually stemmed from incomplete tissue removal and complexity of root canal systems in primary molars.

➤ Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
▪️ A large Cochrane-type review concluded that MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) is superior to formocresol and calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary teeth.
▪️ Another systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated high clinical and radiographic success for pulpotomy in primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis, suggesting that inflammation might be confined to the coronal pulp in many cases.

📊 Comparative Table: Pulpotomy vs Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth

Aspect Advantages Limitations
Tissue preservation Maintains some vital radicular pulp, encouraging natural resorption May leave inflamed tissue if diagnosis is incorrect
Procedure time & behavior Generally faster and less technically demanding; better tolerated in uncooperative children Hemostasis must be achieved; persistent bleeding may complicate treatment
Long-term survival High survival rates over several years (e.g., > 70% at 48 months with bioceramic pulpotomy) :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9} Success depends on correct diagnosis and use of proven medicaments (e.g., MTA) :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}
Indications Irreversible pulpitis with vital radicular tissue; minimal radiographic pathology Not suitable if necrosis, internal/external resorption, or periapical infection present :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}
Risks & complications Lower risk of overfilling; less risk to developing permanent tooth bud Risk of failure if improper agent or poor seal; possible internal resorption
Restoration after treatment Can be restored with stainless steel crowns or other durable restorations with good retention :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12} Coronal leakage or microleakage can compromise outcome if restoration fails

💬 Discussion
The body of evidence suggests that pulpotomy and pulpectomy both have clinically acceptable success in primary teeth when properly indicated. Notably:

▪️ Pulpotomy, especially when using modern materials like MTA or bioceramic cements (e.g., iRoot BP Plus), demonstrates excellent long-term survival.
▪️ Pulpectomy, while more invasive, remains critical in cases of necrosis or when radiographic signs of pathology are present. However, it is technically demanding, particularly due to the complex canal anatomy of primary molars.
▪️ Systematic reviews consistently favor MTA over traditional agents like formocresol or calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy, due to better clinical and radiographic outcomes.
▪️ Patient-centered outcomes also favor more conservative therapy: pulpectomy has been associated with improved quality of life and lower dental anxiety compared to extraction, making it preferable over tooth loss.

Additionally, a recently registered RCT protocol aims to provide more rigorous evidence by comparing pulpotomy vs pulpectomy in primary molars with irreversible pulpitis over two years. This trial could potentially shift paradigms if pulpotomy proves non-inferior, given its lower invasiveness and patient burden.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Among them, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has emerged as a gold standard for pulp therapy, especially for its regenerative properties and sealing capability.
Recommendations for Clinical Practice

1. Case Selection Is Key
▪️ Use pulpotomy when the pulp is vital, bleeding is controlled, and no periapical pathology is evident.
▪️ Reserve pulpectomy for cases with necrosis, internal/external resorption, or evidence of interradicular/periapical disease.

2. Material Choice
▪️ Prefer MTA or bioceramic materials (e.g., iRoot BP Plus) for pulpotomy due to demonstrated higher success rates.
▪️ For pulpectomy, use resorbable filling materials compatible with primary tooth anatomy (e.g., Metapex, Vitapex), though evidence does not strongly favor one over another.

3. Behavior Management & Procedural Efficiency
▪️ Because pulpotomy is generally faster and less technique-sensitive, it may be better suited for younger or less cooperative children.
▪️ Ensure accurate diagnosis (clinical + radiographic) to minimize risk of failed treatment.

4. Follow-up Protocol
▪️ Schedule periodic clinical and radiographic reviews (e.g., 6 months, 12 months, annually) to monitor for signs of failure or resorption.
▪️ Optimize restorative sealing (e.g., stainless-steel crown) to reduce risk of microleakage.

5. Research and Continuous Learning
▪️ Stay updated with ongoing trials (e.g., the non-inferiority RCT of pulpotomy vs pulpectomy in primary molars) for evidence that may refine treatment guidelines.
▪️ Contribute to or audit long-term outcomes in your own practice to inform future decisions.

📌 Recommended Article :
Dental Article 🔽 Partial Pulpotomy in Pediatric Dentistry: Technique, Benefits, and Key Differences ... Partial pulpotomy offers a biologically favorable approach in cases of limited pulp inflammation, especially in traumatic pulp exposures or shallow carious lesions, promoting healing and long-term tooth survival.
✍️ Conclusion
In modern pediatric dentistry, both pulpotomy and pulpectomy remain viable options for managing pulpally involved primary teeth. While pulpotomy offers a more conservative and less time-consuming approach with excellent long-term survival—especially when using materials like MTA or bioceramics—pulpectomy remains irreplaceable in cases of necrosis or advanced pathology. Clinicians should base their choice on careful diagnosis, patient behavior, material selection, and a commitment to follow-up. Together, these strategies help preserve primary teeth, maintain arch integrity, and support the well-being of pediatric patients.

📚 References

✔ Holan, G., & Fuks, A. B. (2015). The role of pulpectomy in the primary dentition. Pediatric Dentistry, 37(6), 559–566.
✔ Philip, N., Cherian, J. M., Mathew, M. G., et al. (2024). Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health, 24, 626. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04411-6
✔ Li, J., Fan, W., Zhou, Y., Wu, L., Liu, W., & Huang, S. (2024). Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Dentistry.
✔ Xu, X., Chen, X., Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Survival analysis of pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in primary molars with carious pulp exposure. International Endodontic Journal.
✔ Walsh, T., Clarke, M., Tsang, A., Marshman, Z., & Petrou, K. (2016). Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), CD003220.
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (n.d.). Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. AAPD Policy.

📌 More Recommended Items

Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025
Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations
Partial pulpotomy vs. Conventional (full) pulpotomy in primary teeth — a comparative, evidence-based review