CTZ vs. Guedes-Pinto Paste in Necrotic Teeth: Which Endodontic Material Performs Better?

The management of necrotic teeth, particularly in pediatric and mixed dentition, remains a clinical challenge due to the presence of polymicrobial infection, periapical inflammation, and complex root canal anatomy. Intracanal medicaments and obturation pastes play a critical role in controlling infection and promoting periapical healing.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol ... The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

Among the materials most frequently discussed in Latin American pediatric dentistry are CTZ paste and Guedes-Pinto paste, both widely used as alternatives to conventional endodontic protocols. This article provides an evidence-based comparison of their composition, mechanisms of action, clinical performance, and limitations in the treatment of necrotic teeth.

Advertisement

✅ Composition of CTZ Paste
CTZ paste is composed of:

▪️ Chloramphenicol
▪️ Tetracycline
▪️ Zinc oxide–eugenol
This combination offers broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, targeting aerobic and anaerobic bacteria commonly associated with endodontic necrosis. Zinc oxide–eugenol serves as a vehicle and obturation medium, providing sealing ability and mild anti-inflammatory effects.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Formocresol Is No Longer Recommended in Pediatric Pulp Therapy: Evidence-Based Risks and Modern Alternatives ... Current evidence raises serious concerns regarding systemic toxicity, mutagenicity, and potential carcinogenic effects, prompting professional organizations to reconsider its use.

✅ Composition of Guedes-Pinto Paste
Guedes-Pinto paste consists of:

▪️ Rifampicin
▪️ Prednisolone
▪️ Camphorated paramonochlorophenol (CMCP)
This formulation combines antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and analgesic properties, making it particularly suitable for infected primary teeth. The corticosteroid component helps reduce periapical inflammation, while CMCP enhances antibacterial efficacy.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Triple Antibiotic Paste (TAP) in Pediatric Endodontics: Current Clinical Evidence ... Despite its effectiveness, concerns regarding tooth discoloration, cytotoxicity, and antibiotic resistance have prompted ongoing research and clinical debate.

✅ Mechanisms of Action

CTZ Paste
▪️ Inhibits bacterial protein synthesis via tetracycline and chloramphenicol
▪️ Provides chemical disinfection without mechanical instrumentation
▪️ Acts as a long-term antimicrobial obturating material

Guedes-Pinto Paste
▪️ Disrupts bacterial cell metabolism through rifampicin and CMCP
▪️ Reduces inflammatory response via prednisolone
▪️ Promotes symptom relief and periapical tissue recovery

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Hydrogen Peroxide Should Not Be Used in Modern Endodontic Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Justification ... Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) was widely used for decades in root canal therapy due to its effervescence and perceived cleaning capability. However, current endodontic literature strongly discourages its use.

✅ Clinical Performance in Necrotic Teeth
Clinical studies indicate that both materials demonstrate high success rates in necrotic primary teeth when properly indicated. CTZ paste is often associated with simplified single-visit protocols, while Guedes-Pinto paste shows favorable outcomes in cases with acute inflammation and pain. However, neither material should be considered a substitute for adequate diagnosis and case selection.

💬 Discussion
The choice between CTZ and Guedes-Pinto paste should be guided by clinical presentation, patient age, systemic considerations, and operator experience. CTZ paste offers prolonged antimicrobial action but raises concerns regarding antibiotic resistance and tooth discoloration. Guedes-Pinto paste provides strong anti-inflammatory effects but may present higher cytotoxic potential due to CMCP. Current evidence supports their use mainly in primary teeth, with limited indication in permanent dentition.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations ... In pediatric dentistry, calcium hydroxide is used primarily for vital pulp therapy procedures such as direct pulp capping, pulpotomy, and apexogenesis. It is also employed in endodontics for apexification of immature permanent teeth.

🎯 Recommendations
▪️ Use CTZ paste in necrotic primary teeth requiring simplified endodontic protocols
▪️ Consider Guedes-Pinto paste in cases with acute inflammation or symptomatic necrosis
▪️ Avoid indiscriminate use due to antibiotic stewardship concerns
▪️ Always perform radiographic and clinical follow-up

✍️ Conclusion
Both CTZ and Guedes-Pinto pastes are effective materials for managing necrotic teeth, particularly in pediatric dentistry. Their success depends on appropriate case selection, understanding of their pharmacological properties, and adherence to evidence-based protocols. Neither material replaces conventional endodontic principles, but both remain valuable tools when used judiciously.

📊 Comparative Table: Clinical Characteristics of a Necrotic Tooth

Clinical Feature	Diagnostic Indicators	Clinical Implications
Loss of pulp vitality	Negative thermal and electric pulp tests	Indicates irreversible pulp damage
Periapical radiolucency	Radiographic evidence of bone loss	Suggests chronic periapical infection
Tooth discoloration	Gray or dark crown appearance	Common in long-standing necrosis
Possible fistula or abscess	Clinical drainage or swelling	Requires immediate infection control

📚 References

✔ Guedes-Pinto, A. C., Paiva, J. G., & Bozzola, J. R. (1981). Endodontic treatment of primary teeth with a paste containing antibiotics and corticosteroids. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 48(2), 144–147.
✔ Rifkin, A. (1980). A simple, effective endodontic technique for primary teeth. Journal of Dentistry for Children, 47(6), 435–441.
✔ Santos, P. S., & de Araujo, F. B. (2009). Antimicrobial activity of CTZ paste in primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 19(6), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01007.x
✔ Leonardo, M. R., & Silva, L. A. B. (2008). Endodontia: Tratamento de canais radiculares. São Paulo: Artes Médicas.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence
► Chemical Caries Removal: Drill-Free Technique, Materials, and Clinical Application
► Calcium Hydroxide: How It Helps Save Children’s Teeth

CTZ Paste in Primary Teeth Pulp Therapy: Indications, Benefits and Clinical Protocol

The use of CTZ paste (Chloramphenicol–Tetracycline–Zinc Oxide) in primary teeth remains a topic of interest, especially in cases of infected primary molars where traditional pulpectomy is not feasible.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

This article presents an updated, evidence-based analysis of its indications, clinical technique, advantages, limitations, and safety considerations.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
The CTZ technique, also known as Lesion Sterilization and Tissue Repair (LSTR), aims to disinfect infected primary teeth by using a topical antibiotic mixture sealed within the pulp chamber. Unlike full pulpectomy, this approach promotes infection control without extensive instrumentation, making it useful in pediatric patients with limited cooperation.
However, concerns regarding antibiotic resistance, systemic absorption, and use of chloramphenicol and tetracycline in children have prompted ongoing debate. Updated guidelines emphasize strict case selection and avoidance of CTZ when safer alternatives (e.g., Vitapex, Ca(OH)₂–iodoform pastes) are available.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide ... Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

✅ Composition of CTZ Paste
CTZ paste typically contains:

▪️ Chloramphenicol (250 mg)
▪️ Tetracycline (250 mg)
▪️ Zinc oxide
▪️ Eugenol or propylene glycol as vehicle

Some variations replace tetracycline with metronidazole or eliminate eugenol.

✅ Mechanism of Action

▪️ Broad-spectrum antibacterial effect against anaerobic and facultative bacteria involved in primary tooth infections.
▪️ Promotes partial tissue repair through reduction of bacterial load.
▪️ Works without canal instrumentation, relying on diffusion through dentinal tubules.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry ... This article explores their mechanisms, techniques, clinical protocols, and compares them to traditional materials such as formocresol and zinc oxide-eugenol.

✅ Clinical Indications
CTZ paste is indicated when:

▪️ The child cannot tolerate conventional pulpectomy.
▪️ Canals are severely obstructed, resorbed, or inaccessible.
▪️ There is chronic infection, fistula, or abscess associated with a restorable tooth.
▪️ Treatment aims to maintain the primary tooth short-term until natural exfoliation or eruption of the successor.

✅ Contraindications

▪️ Children with allergy to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, or eugenol.
▪️ When the tooth is non-restorable.
▪️ Presence of advanced pathological resorption or mobile tooth near exfoliation.
▪️ Patients with systemic conditions requiring antibiotic stewardship.
▪️ When the tooth can receive conventional pulpectomy.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Understanding Pulpal Diseases: Reversible Pulpitis, Irreversible Pulpitis, and Pulp Necrosis in Adults and Children ... Pulpal diseases represent a continuum of inflammatory conditions that range from reversible pulpitis to irreversible pulpitis and finally to pulp necrosis.

✅ Clinical Procedure

1. Local anesthesia and isolation.
2. Removal of coronal pulp and carious tissue.
3. Irrigation with saline or chlorhexidine (no instrumentation of canals).
4. Placement of a thin layer of CTZ paste on chamber floor.
5. Seal with reinforced glass ionomer cement.
6. Final restoration with stainless steel crown, whenever possible.

✅ Benefits

▪️ Requires minimal cooperation, ideal for uncooperative children.
▪️ Effective in reducing clinical signs of infection.
▪️ Faster than pulpectomy.
▪️ Useful in public health settings or emergency care.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Among them, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has emerged as a gold standard for pulp therapy, especially for its regenerative properties and sealing capability.

✅ Limitations and Safety Concerns

▪️ Potential risk of antibiotic resistance.
▪️ Chloramphenicol carries risk of systemic absorption (rare but serious).
▪️ Tetracycline may cause tooth discoloration when absorbed systemically.
▪️ Lower long-term success compared with proper pulpectomy techniques.

📊 Comparative Table: CTZ Paste vs Conventional Pulpectomy

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
CTZ Paste	Minimal instrumentation; fast; good for uncooperative children	Antibiotic exposure; lower long-term success; limited indications
Conventional Pulpectomy	Biocompatible materials; higher long-term success; well-documented evidence	Longer procedure; requires cooperation; technically demanding

💬 Discussion
Although CTZ paste can be effective in selected cases, its use must be ethical and evidence-based. Current pediatric dentistry guidelines favor biocompatible materials (e.g., MTA, Biodentine, Vitapex, Ca(OH)₂) due to better long-term outcomes and absence of systemic antibiotic risks.
Nevertheless, CTZ paste remains a valuable alternative in:

▪️ Remote or resource-limited environments
▪️ Patients with behavioral management challenges
▪️ Complex anatomy preventing conventional therapy

The decision should always consider risk–benefit, parental counseling, and tooth prognosis.

📌 Recommended Article :

PDF 🔽 Manual of diagnosis and pulp treatment in non-vital primary teeth ... Non-vital teeth are those whose nerves lack vitality and there is no blood flow inside. This may be due to deep caries or dental trauma that irreversibly affects the dental pulp.

✍️ Conclusion
CTZ paste is an alternative pulp therapy for infected primary teeth when conventional treatment is not feasible. Its effectiveness relies on infection control, but concerns about antibiotic exposure and resistance require strict clinical judgment. When used appropriately, CTZ can help maintain primary teeth temporarily, supporting occlusal development until natural exfoliation.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Prefer standard pulpectomy when feasible.
▪️ Reserve CTZ for special circumstances and always inform parents about risks.
▪️ Follow-up radiographs every 3–6 months.
▪️ Always restore with full-coverage restoration.
▪️ Consider newer biocompatible pastes as first choice.

📚 References

✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (2023). Pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth. AAPD Clinical Guidelines.
✔ Bimstein, E., & Rotstein, I. (2019). Root canal treatment for children and adolescents. Springer Nature.
✔ Nakornchai, S., Banditsing, P., & Visetratana, N. (2020). Clinical evaluation of LSTR/CTZ therapy in primary teeth. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 30(4), 500–507.
✔ Primosch, R., & Glomb, T. (2018). Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth: Current concepts. Pediatric Dentistry, 40(5), 315–322.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives
► Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence
► Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons