Chewing Gum with Xylitol vs. Other Delivery Forms: Which Works Best to Prevent Dental Caries?

This article evaluates the effectiveness of xylitol chewing gum compared with other xylitol delivery forms—including syrups, lozenges, and wipes—for preventing dental caries in children. Current evidence highlights differences in mechanism, compliance, and clinical outcomes.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: Dosage, Frequency, and Current Controversies ... Key aspects include topical vs. systemic fluoride, caries-preventive effectiveness, and a special update on recent FDA considerations (2025) related to systemic fluoride supplements.

✅ Introduction
Xylitol is a well-established noncariogenic polyol with proven benefits in reducing Streptococcus mutans levels and caries incidence. Although chewing gum is the most widely studied delivery form, alternative methods such as xylitol syrup, lozenges, and oral wipes have expanded clinical use, especially in younger children who cannot chew gum. This article examines which delivery form offers the most effective caries-preventive benefit based on current scientific evidence.

Advertisement

✅ Mechanism of Action Across Delivery Forms
All delivery forms rely on the same primary mechanism: inhibition of Streptococcus mutans metabolism, reduced bacterial adhesion, and promotion of salivary flow. Chewing gum, however, provides an additional benefit by stimulating saliva, which enhances buffering capacity and mechanical clearance.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Xylitol and Dental Caries Prevention in Children: Mechanism, Benefits, and Clinical Use ... This review explores its mechanism of action, clinical indications, dosage in pediatric populations, and how it compares with other caries-preventive agents such as fluoride and sorbitol.

✅ Presentations
Below is a structured presentation of the main xylitol product formulations used in pediatric caries prevention. Each subsection summarizes evidence, practical advantages, and age-appropriate considerations.

➤ Xylitol Chewing Gum
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Multiple randomized trials and long-term studies show that xylitol chewing gum (used 3–5 times/day) reduces caries incidence in school-aged children.
▪️ Practical notes: Provides salivary stimulation and prolonged oral exposure; best suited for children able to safely chew gum (typically ≥5 years). Not recommended for toddlers due to choking risk and chewing ability.

➤ Xylitol Syrup
▪️ Evidence & rationale: RCTs in infants and toddlers demonstrate that xylitol syrup administered by caregivers (e.g., divided doses totaling ~8–10 g/day) reduces vertical transmission of S. mutans and lowers early childhood caries (ECC) incidence.
▪️ Practical notes: Ideal for children who cannot chew; dosing and caregiver compliance are critical.

➤ Xylitol Lozenges (or Pastilles)
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Lozenges prolong contact time in the oral cavity and have shown similar antimicrobial effects to gum when consistently used. Clinical effectiveness depends on adherence and correct use (slow dissolution).
▪️ Practical notes: Useful in settings where gum is restricted (e.g., schools) but require that children understand not to swallow or chew them prematurely.

➤ Xylitol Wipes and Topical Applications
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Primarily studied for their ability to reduce salivary/plaque levels of S. mutans in infants. Evidence for direct caries-preventive outcomes is limited but promising as an adjunct.
▪️ Practical notes: Best as part of a caregiver-administered routine for infants and very young children; not a standalone solution for high-risk cases.

➤ Combined or Programmatic Use (e.g., Maternal + Child Regimens)
▪️ Evidence & rationale: Studies combining maternal xylitol use with child interventions (e.g., syrup or wipes) show additive reductions in transmission and caries risk. Programmatic approaches used in public health initiatives often yield better population outcomes.
▪️ Practical notes: Consider combined strategies for high-risk populations; logistics and adherence must be planned.

📊 Comparative Table: Xylitol Delivery Forms for Caries Prevention

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Xylitol Chewing Gum	Strong evidence; high salivary stimulation; convenient for older children	Not suitable for toddlers; requires chewing ability; school restrictions
Xylitol Syrup	Ideal for infants; well-studied; easy caregiver administration	Higher sugar-like intake volume; requires multiple doses daily
Xylitol Lozenges	Prolonged oral exposure; gum alternative for older children	Dependent on compliance; choking risk for small children
Xylitol Wipes	Useful for infants; reduces S. mutans transmission	Less evidence for caries reduction; lower overall effectiveness

💬 Discussion
Among all delivery forms, xylitol chewing gum consistently demonstrates the strongest evidence for reducing dental caries in older children, largely due to its enhanced salivary stimulation and frequent dosing opportunities. Xylitol syrup, however, is the preferred form for toddlers and infants due to safety and ease of administration. Lozenges serve as a practical alternative for older children unable to chew gum during school hours, whereas wipes play a supportive role primarily in S. mutans reduction rather than direct caries prevention.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: A Review ... This review explores its mechanism of action, clinical indications, advantages, and limitations compared to other fluoride therapies used in pediatric dentistry.

✍️ Conclusion
Chewing gum with xylitol remains the most effective delivery form for preventing dental caries in school-aged children, supported by robust clinical evidence. For younger age groups, xylitol syrup is the preferred option, while lozenges and wipes offer supplementary or situational benefits. The optimal delivery form should consider age, safety, compliance, and clinical goals.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Use xylitol chewing gum (3–5 daily exposures) for children ≥5 years.
▪️ Prefer xylitol syrup for infants and toddlers.
▪️ Use lozenges where gum is not permitted.
▪️ Use wipes as an adjunct to reduce S. mutans in infants.
▪️ Select products containing at least 1 g of xylitol per dose.

📚 References

✔ Dodds, M. W. J. (2015). Xylitol and oral health. Journal of Dental Education, 79(10), 1169–1172. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26438299/
✔ Honkala, S., & Honkala, E. (2017). Chewing gum and caries prevention in children. International Journal of Dentistry, 2017, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8365651
✔ Hujoel, P. P., Lingström, P., & Bader, J. D. (2017). The effects of xylitol on dental caries and oral flora. Journal of the American Dental Association, 148(6), 455–463.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.03.013
✔ Milgrom, P., Ly, K. A., Roberts, M. C., Rothen, M., Mueller, G., & Yamaguchi, D. K. (2006). Xylitol pediatric syrup for caries prevention: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160(11), 1272–1276. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.160.11.1272
✔ Söderling, E. M. (2009). Xylitol, mutans streptococci, and dental plaque. Advances in Dental Research, 21(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895937409335620

📌 More Recommended Items

► Fluoride Varnish for Preventing and Treating White Spot Lesions: Clinical Evidence and Best Practices
► Silver Diamine Fluoride in Pediatric Dentistry: Clinical Guide 2025
► How to Apply: Clinpro Sealant - Step by step

Pulpotomy vs. Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth: A Contemporary Clinical Guide

Vital pulp therapy in primary teeth is a cornerstone of pediatric dental treatment. Among the most common procedures are pulpotomy, which conserves some of the radicular pulp, and pulpectomy, which removes all pulp tissue.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Manual of diagnosis and pulp treatment in non-vital primary teeth ... Non-vital teeth are those whose nerves lack vitality and there is no blood flow inside. This may be due to deep caries or dental trauma that irreversibly affects the dental pulp.

Understanding the clinical indications, long-term outcomes, advantages, and limitations of each technique is essential for optimizing patient care and maintaining primary teeth until exfoliation.

Advertisement

✅ Background and Rationale
Primary teeth differ significantly from permanent teeth in morphology and physiology, notably in their root anatomy, resorption patterns, and innervation. Current pediatric dentistry guidelines (e.g., AAPD) describe pulpotomy as indicated when coronal pulp is inflamed but radicular pulp remains vital. Meanwhile, pulpectomy is generally reserved for cases with necrosis, irreversible pulpitis, or radiographic pathology.

📌 Recommended Article :

Video 🔽 Pulpectomy. Step-by-Step Procedure - Access, Preparation, and Obturation ... We share the step-by-step procedure of a pulpectomy performed with rotary files. In this video we can observe the opening, chemomechanical preparation and obturation.

✅ Clinical Evidence: Success Rates & Comparative Outcomes

➤ Randomized & Controlled Trials
▪️ A multicenter RCT comparing cervical pulpotomy (with calcium-enriched mixture cement) versus pulpectomy (Metapex) in primary molars with irreversible pulpitis found no significant difference in clinical and radiographic success rates. PubMed
▪️ In a split-mouth randomized trial on primary incisors with vital pulp exposure, pulpotomy (formocresol) and pulpectomy (zinc-oxide-eugenol) showed similar 12-month success, with survival rates of ~82% vs ~74%, respectively (not statistically significant).

➤ Observational and Cohort Studies
A retrospective cohort study of 876 primary molars reported that iRoot BP Plus pulpotomy had a significantly better long-term prognosis (survival over 48 months) than Vitapex pulpectomy.
A survival analysis of pulpectomy under general anesthesia found that failures usually stemmed from incomplete tissue removal and complexity of root canal systems in primary molars.

➤ Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
▪️ A large Cochrane-type review concluded that MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate) is superior to formocresol and calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary teeth.
▪️ Another systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated high clinical and radiographic success for pulpotomy in primary teeth with irreversible pulpitis, suggesting that inflammation might be confined to the coronal pulp in many cases.

📊 Comparative Table: Pulpotomy vs Pulpectomy in Primary Teeth

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Tissue preservation	Maintains some vital radicular pulp, encouraging natural resorption	May leave inflamed tissue if diagnosis is incorrect
Procedure time & behavior	Generally faster and less technically demanding; better tolerated in uncooperative children	Hemostasis must be achieved; persistent bleeding may complicate treatment
Long-term survival	High survival rates over several years (e.g., > 70% at 48 months with bioceramic pulpotomy) :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}	Success depends on correct diagnosis and use of proven medicaments (e.g., MTA) :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}
Indications	Irreversible pulpitis with vital radicular tissue; minimal radiographic pathology	Not suitable if necrosis, internal/external resorption, or periapical infection present :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}
Risks & complications	Lower risk of overfilling; less risk to developing permanent tooth bud	Risk of failure if improper agent or poor seal; possible internal resorption
Restoration after treatment	Can be restored with stainless steel crowns or other durable restorations with good retention :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}	Coronal leakage or microleakage can compromise outcome if restoration fails

💬 Discussion
The body of evidence suggests that pulpotomy and pulpectomy both have clinically acceptable success in primary teeth when properly indicated. Notably:

▪️ Pulpotomy, especially when using modern materials like MTA or bioceramic cements (e.g., iRoot BP Plus), demonstrates excellent long-term survival.
▪️ Pulpectomy, while more invasive, remains critical in cases of necrosis or when radiographic signs of pathology are present. However, it is technically demanding, particularly due to the complex canal anatomy of primary molars.
▪️ Systematic reviews consistently favor MTA over traditional agents like formocresol or calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy, due to better clinical and radiographic outcomes.
▪️ Patient-centered outcomes also favor more conservative therapy: pulpectomy has been associated with improved quality of life and lower dental anxiety compared to extraction, making it preferable over tooth loss.

Additionally, a recently registered RCT protocol aims to provide more rigorous evidence by comparing pulpotomy vs pulpectomy in primary molars with irreversible pulpitis over two years. This trial could potentially shift paradigms if pulpotomy proves non-inferior, given its lower invasiveness and patient burden.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Among them, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has emerged as a gold standard for pulp therapy, especially for its regenerative properties and sealing capability.

✅ Recommendations for Clinical Practice

1. Case Selection Is Key
▪️ Use pulpotomy when the pulp is vital, bleeding is controlled, and no periapical pathology is evident.
▪️ Reserve pulpectomy for cases with necrosis, internal/external resorption, or evidence of interradicular/periapical disease.

2. Material Choice
▪️ Prefer MTA or bioceramic materials (e.g., iRoot BP Plus) for pulpotomy due to demonstrated higher success rates.
▪️ For pulpectomy, use resorbable filling materials compatible with primary tooth anatomy (e.g., Metapex, Vitapex), though evidence does not strongly favor one over another.

3. Behavior Management & Procedural Efficiency
▪️ Because pulpotomy is generally faster and less technique-sensitive, it may be better suited for younger or less cooperative children.
▪️ Ensure accurate diagnosis (clinical + radiographic) to minimize risk of failed treatment.

4. Follow-up Protocol
▪️ Schedule periodic clinical and radiographic reviews (e.g., 6 months, 12 months, annually) to monitor for signs of failure or resorption.
▪️ Optimize restorative sealing (e.g., stainless-steel crown) to reduce risk of microleakage.

5. Research and Continuous Learning
▪️ Stay updated with ongoing trials (e.g., the non-inferiority RCT of pulpotomy vs pulpectomy in primary molars) for evidence that may refine treatment guidelines.
▪️ Contribute to or audit long-term outcomes in your own practice to inform future decisions.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Partial Pulpotomy in Pediatric Dentistry: Technique, Benefits, and Key Differences ... Partial pulpotomy offers a biologically favorable approach in cases of limited pulp inflammation, especially in traumatic pulp exposures or shallow carious lesions, promoting healing and long-term tooth survival.

✍️ Conclusion
In modern pediatric dentistry, both pulpotomy and pulpectomy remain viable options for managing pulpally involved primary teeth. While pulpotomy offers a more conservative and less time-consuming approach with excellent long-term survival—especially when using materials like MTA or bioceramics—pulpectomy remains irreplaceable in cases of necrosis or advanced pathology. Clinicians should base their choice on careful diagnosis, patient behavior, material selection, and a commitment to follow-up. Together, these strategies help preserve primary teeth, maintain arch integrity, and support the well-being of pediatric patients.

📚 References

✔ Holan, G., & Fuks, A. B. (2015). The role of pulpectomy in the primary dentition. Pediatric Dentistry, 37(6), 559–566.
✔ Philip, N., Cherian, J. M., Mathew, M. G., et al. (2024). Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in vital primary molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health, 24, 626. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04411-6
✔ Li, J., Fan, W., Zhou, Y., Wu, L., Liu, W., & Huang, S. (2024). Pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Dentistry.
✔ Xu, X., Chen, X., Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Survival analysis of pulpotomy versus pulpectomy in primary molars with carious pulp exposure. International Endodontic Journal.
✔ Walsh, T., Clarke, M., Tsang, A., Marshman, Z., & Petrou, K. (2016). Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), CD003220.
✔ American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. (n.d.). Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. AAPD Policy.

📌 More Recommended Items

► Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025
► Calcium Hydroxide in Pediatric Dentistry: Benefits and Limitations
► Partial pulpotomy vs. Conventional (full) pulpotomy in primary teeth — a comparative, evidence-based review

Why Patients With Diabetes Develop Gingival Inflammation, Tooth Mobility, and Tooth Loss

This article examines why patients with diabetes commonly develop gingival inflammation, tooth mobility, and progressive tooth loss, emphasizing the interplay between hyperglycemia, immune dysfunction, periodontal pathogens, and tissue destruction.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Why Does Diabetes Cause Dry Mouth? Understanding the Link Between Xerostomia and Blood Sugar Levels ... Since saliva plays a critical role in maintaining oral and systemic health, understanding the mechanisms behind xerostomia in diabetes is essential for prevention and management of related complications.

✅ Introduction
Diabetes mellitus is recognized as one of the strongest systemic risk factors for periodontal disease. High blood glucose levels impair immune responses, alter the oral microbiome, and accelerate periodontal tissue breakdown. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for improving prevention and management strategies in diabetic populations.

Advertisement

✅ Pathophysiology of Gingival Inflammation in Diabetes
Diabetes promotes chronic inflammation through several mechanisms:

▪️ Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) accumulate in tissues, triggering exaggerated inflammatory responses.
▪️ Neutrophil dysfunction reduces the host’s ability to control oral pathogens.
▪️ Microvascular impairment decreases oxygenation and nutrient delivery to periodontal tissues.

As a result, patients frequently exhibit red, swollen, and bleeding gums even with moderate plaque levels.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Key Differences Between Gingivitis, Periodontitis, and Aggressive Periodontitis: Updated Clinical Review ... This academic article critically examines these distinctions based on current scientific evidence and emphasizes their clinical implications for dental professionals.

✅ Reasons for Tooth Mobility in Diabetic Patients
Tooth mobility arises because:

▪️ Chronic hyperglycemia accelerates alveolar bone resorption.
▪️ Altered collagen metabolism weakens periodontal ligament fibers.
▪️ Persistent inflammation destroys connective tissue attachment.

These factors collectively lead to progressive periodontal breakdown, manifesting as increased probing depths, attachment loss, and mobility.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Oral Manifestations of Systemic Diseases: Updated Clinical Review ... Due to its high vascularity and immune role, the oral cavity frequently reflects systemic conditions. In modern dentistry, recognizing these signs is key to preventive care and interdisciplinary treatment.

✅ Mechanisms Leading to Tooth Loss
If untreated, the combination of inflammation, bone loss, and connective tissue destruction ultimately results in tooth loss. Key contributors include:

▪️ Excessive inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β and TNF-α.
▪️ Reduced wound healing capacity due to microvascular complications.
▪️ Increased susceptibility to destructive periodontal pathogens like Porphyromonas gingivalis.

Studies consistently show that poorly controlled diabetes is associated with a significantly higher risk of edentulism.

📌 Recommended Article :

Video 🔽 Can a tooth be extracted in diabetic patients? ... The dentist must take all precautions when caring for a diabetic patient, especially when performing a tooth extraction. A complete interrogation on the health of the patient and a correct clinical evaluation must be carried out beforehand.

✅ Additional Factors that Worsen Periodontal Outcomes in Diabetes

▪️ Smoking
▪️ Poor glycemic control (HbA1c > 7%)
▪️ Hyposalivation
▪️ Altered oral microbiota
▪️ Delayed tissue repair

These factors explain why even well-motivated diabetic patients may experience rapid periodontal deterioration if systemic control is insufficient.

📊 Comparative Table: Clinical Indicators of Periodontal Damage in Diabetic Patients

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
Periodontal Probing Depth	Identifies early and advanced tissue breakdown	Technique-sensitive; inflammation may alter readings
Radiographic Bone Loss Assessment	Provides objective visualization of alveolar bone changes	Cannot detect soft-tissue inflammation or early lesions
Tooth Mobility Evaluation	Simple clinical indicator of disease progression	Influenced by trauma, occlusion, or temporary inflammation
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)	Useful marker for inflammatory activity	Not always present in severe chronic cases in diabetics

💬 Discussion
There is strong bidirectional evidence linking diabetes and periodontal disease. Periodontitis worsens glycemic control, while uncontrolled diabetes accelerates periodontal destruction. This relationship underscores the importance of integrated dental and medical management. Regular periodontal therapy significantly improves both oral health outcomes and metabolic parameters.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Prosecco Teeth: The Growing Dental Concern at Celebrations ... However, dental professionals are raising alarms about a condition termed "Prosecco teeth," highlighting the potential oral health risks associated with this sparkling beverage.

✍️ Conclusion
Patients with diabetes are more prone to gingival inflammation, tooth mobility, and tooth loss due to immune dysregulation, microvascular damage, elevated inflammatory mediators, and impaired wound healing. Early diagnosis, consistent periodontal therapy, and strict glycemic control are essential to prevent irreversible damage.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Conduct periodontal evaluations every 3–4 months for diabetic patients.
▪️ Emphasize glycemic control as part of periodontal therapy.
▪️ Encourage meticulous plaque control with interdental hygiene.
▪️ Provide tailored education on the oral-systemic health connection.
▪️ Collaborate closely with physicians to monitor metabolic status.

📚 References

✔ American Diabetes Association. (2023). Standards of medical care in diabetes–2023. Diabetes Care, 46(Supplement_1), S1–S291. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc23-SINT
✔ Mealey, B. L., & Ocampo, G. L. (2017). Diabetes mellitus and periodontal disease. Periodontology 2000, 44(1), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00193.x
✔ Preshaw, P. M., Alba, A. L., Herrera, D., Jepsen, S., Konstantinidis, A., Makrilakis, K., & Taylor, R. (2012). Periodontitis and diabetes: A two-way relationship. Diabetologia, 55, 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-011-2342-y
✔ Taylor, G. W., & Borgnakke, W. S. (2008). Periodontal disease: Associations with diabetes, glycemic control and complications. Oral Diseases, 14(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2008.01442.x

📌 More Recommended Items

► How to Treat Tonsil Stones
► Top Antibiotics and Mouthwashes for Periodontal Treatment: Updated Guide with Doses and Benefits
► Is Gingivitis or Periodontitis Contagious? A Scientific Overview of Transmission, Symptoms, and Microbiota

Bioactive Materials in Pulpotomies: MTA, Biodentine and Emerging Alternatives

Bioactive materials have transformed vital pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine remain the most reliable options due to their biocompatibility, sealing ability, and predictable dentin bridge formation.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Management of Pulpal Infections in Primary Teeth: Evidence-Based Protocols 2025 ... This 2025 update provides a concise, evidence-based overview of pulpal infection management in primary teeth, following the latest AAPD 2024 classification and clinical protocols.

Newer agents such as bioceramic putties continue to expand treatment possibilities. Understanding the clinical performance and limitations of each material is essential for evidence-based decision-making in pulpotomies.

Advertisement

✅ Introduction
Pulpotomy remains a widely used treatment for reversible pulp inflammation in primary teeth, aiming to maintain tooth vitality until exfoliation. Over the last two decades, bioactive materials have replaced traditional agents due to superior biological responses and reduced cytotoxicity. Current evidence strongly supports the use of MTA, Biodentine, and next-generation hydraulic calcium silicate cements as the materials of choice.
This article reviews the mechanisms, clinical performance, and limitations of the most relevant bioactive materials used in pediatric pulpotomies.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) in Pediatric Dentistry: Uses, Benefits, and Clinical Evidence ... Preserving primary teeth until their natural exfoliation is a key goal in pediatric dentistry. Advances in bioactive materials have made this more predictable.

✅ MTA: Mechanism and Clinical Behavior
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) is one of the most documented pulpotomy materials. Key properties include its strong biocompatibility, high sealing ability, and promotion of dentin bridge formation.

➤ Advantages:
▪️ Releases calcium hydroxide, stimulating hard tissue formation.
▪️ Excellent marginal seal, preventing microleakage.
▪️ Proven long-term success rates in primary teeth.

➤ Limitations:
▪️ Difficult handling.
▪️ Long setting time.
▪️ Potential dentin and enamel discoloration due to bismuth oxide.
Large-scale systematic reviews continue to position MTA as a gold standard in partial and full pulpotomies.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Pulpotec® in Pulpotomy: Composition, Indications, Protocol & Clinical Pros and Cons ... Pulpotec® is a radiopaque, non‑resorbable medicament widely used for pulpotomy/pulpitis treatment in vital primary and immature permanent molars, as well as for emergency root canal dressings.

✅ Biodentine: A Calcium Silicate with Enhanced Handling
Biodentine is a high-purity tricalcium silicate cement developed to overcome practical limitations of MTA. Its faster setting time, improved mechanical properties, and higher biocompatibility make it ideal for pediatric use.

➤ Advantages:
▪️ Sets within 12 minutes.
▪️ Superior mechanical strength.
▪️ Does not stain tooth structure.
▪️ Promotes predictable tertiary dentin deposition.

➤ Limitations:
▪️ Cost may be higher in some regions.
▪️ Requires strict moisture control during placement.
Clinical trials show success rates comparable—sometimes superior—to MTA for primary teeth pulpotomies.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Medications Used in Pulpotomies: Properties, Drawbacks, and Brand Names ... Pulpotomy is a conservative dental procedure aimed at preserving the vitality of the radicular pulp after removing the affected coronal pulp. This treatment is common in primary teeth and young permanent teeth.

✅ New Bioceramic Alternatives
Recently introduced premixed bioceramic putties (e.g., EndoSequence Root Repair Material, TotalFill) offer excellent handling and consistent composition.

➤ Advantages:
▪️ Ready-to-use format.
▪️ No discoloration.
▪️ High radiopacity.

➤ Limitations:
▪️ Less long-term evidence compared to MTA and Biodentine.
▪️ Higher price point.
Emerging literature supports their use in vital pulp therapy, but they should currently be considered adjunctive rather than primary options.

📊 Comparative Table: Bioactive Materials Used in Pulpotomy

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
MTA	Excellent sealing ability; high biocompatibility; strong evidence base	Long setting time; potential discoloration; difficult handling
Biodentine	Fast setting time; no discoloration; improved mechanical properties	Higher cost; requires moisture control
Bioceramic Putties	Ready-to-use; radiopaque; stable composition	Limited long-term data; higher cost

💬 Discussion
Bioactive materials demonstrate superior biological performance compared with traditional agents such as formocresol or ferric sulfate. Among all available options, MTA and Biodentine show the strongest evidence, high success rates, and favorable clinical outcomes.
Biodentine excels in handling and aesthetics, while MTA maintains unmatched historical and clinical validation. Next-generation bioceramics may eventually match these standards, but they still lack extensive longitudinal data in pediatric pulpotomies.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Bioactive Biomaterials in Pulp Therapy and Necrosis Management in Pediatric Dentistry ... The evolution of pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry has shifted from traditional medicaments to bioactive biomaterials that promote regeneration and tissue healing.

✍️ Conclusion
Bioactive materials have significantly improved the prognosis of pulpotomies in primary teeth. MTA and Biodentine remain the most reliable choices, offering excellent sealing ability and biocompatibility. Although new bioceramic materials show promise, further research is needed to confirm long-term performance. Selecting the appropriate material should be based on clinical indication, handling needs, and evidence-based guidelines.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Prefer MTA or Biodentine for routine pediatric pulpotomies.
▪️ Use bioceramic putties in cases requiring enhanced handling or when discoloration is a concern.
▪️ Maintain strict isolation and moisture control to optimize clinical outcomes.
▪️ Follow radiographic and clinical follow-ups at 6 and 12 months.
▪️ Avoid outdated pulpotomy agents with documented cytotoxicity.

📚 References

✔ Camilleri, J. (2014). Tricalcium silicate cements in endodontics. Dental Materials, 30(7), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.03.007
✔ Nowicka, A., Lipski, M., Parafiniuk, M., Sporniak-Tutak, K., Lichota, D., Kosierkiewicz, A., ... & Buczkowska-Radlińska, J. (2013). Response of human dental pulp capped with Biodentine and MTA. Journal of Endodontics, 39(6), 743–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.005
✔ Smaïl-Faugeron, V., Courson, F., Durieux, P., Muller-Bolla, M., Glenny, A. M., & Fron Chabouis, H. (2018). Mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide for pulpotomy in primary molars: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 28(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12361
✔ Taha, N. A., & Abdelkhader, S. Z. (2018). Outcome of full pulpotomy using Biodentine in adult patients with symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis. International Endodontic Journal, 51(8), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12902

📌 More Recommended Items

► Calcium Hydroxide/Iodoform Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpectomies: Benefits and Clinical Evidence
► Pulp Therapy in Pediatric Dentistry: Complete and Updated Guide
► Irrigants in Pediatric Pulpectomies: Key Benefits, Properties, and U.S. Commercial Brands

Pharmacological Management According to Post-Extraction Complications

Post-extraction complications require targeted pharmacological strategies to prevent pain, infection, and delayed healing. Understanding how to select appropriate medications based on the specific post-extraction complication is essential for safe and predictable outcomes.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 How to Prevent Dry Socket After Tooth Extraction: Signs, Prevention, and Treatment Guide ... Preventing dry socket is a key responsibility shared by both dental professionals and patients, involving proper surgical technique, patient education, and targeted pharmacological management.

This article reviews current evidence on the pharmacological management of post-extraction complications, including pain, alveolar osteitis, infection, and soft tissue inflammation.

Advertisement

✅ Common Post-Extraction Complications and Pharmacological Management

1. Pain and Inflammation
Acute pain following extraction is typically nociceptive and inflammatory. Evidence supports the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-line therapy due to their superior analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects compared with opioids.

➤ Recommended Pharmacological Management:
▪️ Ibuprofen: 400–600 mg every 6–8 h (max 2400 mg/day).
▪️ Acetaminophen: 500–1000 mg every 6 h (max 3000 mg/day).
Combination therapy (ibuprofen + acetaminophen) has been shown to offer superior analgesia compared with opioid-containing regimens.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Pediatric Dentistry: When and How to Use It Safely in 2025 ...Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric dentistry is a preventive measure used to avoid serious systemic infections, such as infective endocarditis, in children undergoing dental procedures.

2. Alveolar Osteitis (Dry Socket)
Dry socket results from premature clot loss and localized inflammation. While systemic antibiotics are not recommended, pharmacologic management focuses on local and systemic pain control.

➤ Recommended Pharmacological Management:
▪️ NSAIDs for pain control.
▪️ Topical anesthetic dressings containing eugenol for short-term symptomatic relief.
▪️ Avoid prolonged use of eugenol-based medicaments due to delayed healing risk.

📌 Recommended Article :

PDF 🔽 Manual of extraction techniques in pediatric dentistry - Step by step ... Tooth extraction is a routine treatment in the pediatric dentist's office. This procedure is performed when the tooth presents a deep caries and impossible reconstruction, fracture due to trauma, eruptive problems.

3. Post-Extraction Infection
When a surgical site exhibits suppuration, fever, and spreading erythema, infection is likely present. Antibiotics are indicated only when systemic signs or progressive infection occur, not as routine prophylaxis.

➤ Recommended Antibiotics:
▪️ Amoxicillin 500 mg every 8 h for 5–7 days.
▪️ Amoxicillin-clavulanate 875/125 mg every 12 h for more severe cases.
▪️ Clindamycin 300 mg every 8 h for penicillin-allergic patients.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Anatomical Landmarks in Dental Anesthetic Techniques: A Complete Clinical Review ... This article reviews the main anatomical references for each local anesthetic technique in both adult and pediatric patients, emphasizing clinical precision and anatomical variations.

4. Persistent Swelling or Soft Tissue Inflammation
Post-operative swelling may be associated with trauma or early infection.

➤ Recommended Pharmacological Management:
▪️ NSAIDs as baseline therapy.
▪️ Short course of corticosteroids (e.g., dexamethasone 4 mg single dose, or prednisone 10–20 mg for 1–2 days) may be beneficial in select cases to reduce severe inflammation.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Post-Extraction Complications in Pediatric Dentistry: Prevention and Management of Dry Socket ... This article reviews the etiology, clinical presentation, prevention, and management of dry socket in children, focusing on current pharmacologic and clinical strategies to ensure faster recovery and prevent recurrence.

5. Bleeding-Related Complications
Uncontrolled bleeding is not typically managed pharmacologically, but adjunct medications can help stabilize the site.

➤ Recommended Adjunct Therapies:
▪️ Tranexamic acid mouth rinse (4.8%), particularly in anticoagulated patients.
▪️ Topical hemostatic agents such as oxidized cellulose or gelatin sponges.

📊 Comparative Table: Pharmacological Options by Post-Extraction Complication

Aspect	Advantages	Limitations
NSAIDs for Pain Control	Effective for inflammation and nociceptive pain	Contraindicated in gastric disease or renal issues
Antibiotics for Infection	Effective for progressive or systemic infections	Not indicated for routine post-extraction use

💬 Discussion
Pharmacological management must be tailored to the specific post-extraction complication rather than applied universally. NSAIDs remain the cornerstone for controlling dental extraction pain, with substantial evidence supporting their superiority over opioid regimens. Antibiotics must be used judiciously to limit antimicrobial resistance and adverse effects. Topical medicaments for dry socket offer symptomatic relief but should be applied selectively. Corticosteroids may be useful for severe inflammation but are not routinely required.
Understanding the pathophysiology behind each complication guides medication selection, improving therapeutic outcomes and reducing patient morbidity.

📌 Recommended Article :

Dental Article 🔽 Preventive Measures Before and After Tooth Extraction: Clinical Guidelines for Safe Recovery ... This article presents evidence-based preventive measures before and after extraction to ensure optimal outcomes and patient comfort, highlighting the differences in management between pediatric and adult patients.

🔎 Recommendations
▪️ Use NSAIDs as first-line therapy for pain and inflammation unless contraindicated.
▪️ Reserve systemic antibiotics for cases with clear signs of infection.
▪️ Avoid unnecessary opioid prescriptions.
▪️ Use topical anesthetic dressings for dry socket only when clinically indicated.
▪️ Consider corticosteroids for severe inflammatory swelling on a case-by-case basis.
▪️ Educate patients on warning signs requiring immediate reassessment (fever, worsening pain, spreading swelling).

✍️ Conclusion
Pharmacological management following dental extraction should be individualized based on the complication presented. NSAIDs offer effective first-line analgesia, while systemic antibiotics must be reserved for true infections. Evidence-based selection of analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and adjunct therapies enhances healing and minimizes complications. Adhering to a targeted, complication-specific approach ensures safer and more predictable post-extraction outcomes.

📚 References

✔ American Dental Association. (2020). Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain. Journal of the American Dental Association, 151(11), 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2020.06.006
✔ Beaudoin, F. L., Banerjee, G. N., & Mello, M. J. (2019). State-level opioid prescribing for dental procedures. Journal of the American Dental Association, 150(7), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2019.02.018
✔ Blum, I. R. (2002). Contemporary views on dry socket (alveolar osteitis): A clinical appraisal of standardization, aetiopathogenesis and management. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 60(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.29825
✔ Halpern, L. R., Dodson, T. B., & Dodson, T. B. (2019). Do corticosteroids reduce postoperative morbidity? Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 128(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.04.002
✔ Rogers, S. N., & Patel, M. (2020). Management of post-operative infection in oral surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 58(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.11.016

📌 More Recommended Items

► Preventing Dental Emergencies in Primary Dentition: Caries, Abscesses and Early Intervention
► Analgesic and Antibiotic Recommendations in Pediatric Oral Surgery
► Differential Diagnosis of Post-Extraction Conditions: Clinical Guide for Dentists